Новости фразы на немецком гитлера

Главная» Новости» Выступление гитлера на немецком кричит.

"Why We Are Antisemites" - Text of Adolf Hitler's 1920 speech at the Hofbräuhaus

1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,900 Ob du meine Arbeit für richtig hältst, 2 00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:08,990 ob du glaubst, dass ich fleißig gewesen bin, dass ich gearbeitet habe. 3 00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:11,900 dass ich mich in diesen Jahren für dich eingesetzt habe, 4 00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:16,990 dass ich. Heil Hitler! — «да здравствует Гитлер, слава Гитлеру» (обычно передаётся по-русски как Хайль Гитлер) или просто нем. Главная» Новости» Выступление гитлера про евреев. I would like to find all Hitler speeches in original German, but the more I look, the less I find. Sure there are a few here and there, but his complete speeches in German are nowhere to find. I did find a full text on , (linked to also in this answer) but sadly that is only in English. Also the search. Вождь Рейха Адольф Гитлер имеет полную единодушную поддержку всего немецкого народа: какая еще демократия нужна демагогам Запада?».

Хайль Гитлер

Therefore it is my unalterable determination so to organize German lab our that it will guarantee the maintenance of my people. Eden may rest assured that we shall utilize every possibility offered us of strengthening our economic relations with other nations, but also that we shall avail ourselves of every possibility to improve and enrich the circulation of our own internal trade. I must ask also whether the grounds for assuming that Germany is pursuing a policy of isolation are to be found in the fact that we have left he League of Nations. If such be the grounds, then I would point out that the Geneva League has never been a real League of peoples. A number of great nations do not belong to it or have left it. And nobody has on this account asserted that they were following a policy of isolation. I think therefore that on this point Mr.

Eden misunderstands our intentions and views. For nothing is farther from our wishes than to break off or weaken our political or economic relations with other nations. I have already tried to contribute towards bringing about a good understanding in Europe and I have often given, especially to the British people and their Government, assurance of how ardently we wish for a sincere and cordial cooperation with them. I admit that on one point there is a wide difference between the views of the British Foreign Secretary and our views; and here it seems to me that this is a gap which cannot be filled up. Eden declares that under no circumstances does the British Government wish to see Europe torn into two halves. Unfortunately, this desire for unity has not hitherto been declared or listened to.

And now the desire is an illusion. For the fact is that the division into two halves, not only of Europe but also of the whole world, is an accomplished fact. It is to be regretted that the British Government did not adopt its present attitude at an earlier date, that under all circumstances a division of Europe must be avoided; for then the Treaty of Versailles would not have been entered into. This Treaty brought in the first division of Europe, namely a division of the nations into victors on the one side and vanquished on the other, the latter nations being outlawed. Through this division of Europe nobody suffered more than the German people. That this division was wiped out, so far as concerns Germany, is essentially due to the National Socialist Revolution and this brings some credit to myself.

The second division has been brought about by the proclamation of the Bolshevic doctrine, an integral feature of which is that they do not confine it to one nation but try to impose it on all the nations. Here it is not a question of a special form of national life in Russia but of the Bolshevic demand for a world revolution. If Mr. Eden does not look at Bolshevism as we look at it, that may have something to do with the position of Great Britain and also with some happenings that are unknown to us. But I believe that nobody will question the sincerity of our opinions on this matter, for they are not based merely on abstract theory. For Mr.

Eden Bolshevism is perhaps a thing which has its seat in Moscow, but for us in Germany this Bolshevism is a pestilence against which we have had to struggle at the cost of much bloodshed. It is a pestilence which tried to turn our country into the same kind of desert as is now the case in Spain; for the habit of murdering hostages began here, in the form in which we now see it in Spain. National Socialism did not try to come to grips with Bolshevism in Russia, but the Jewish international Bolshevics in Moscow have tried to introduce their system into Germany and are still trying to do so. Against this attempt we have waged a bitter struggle, not only in defence of our own civilization but in defence of European civilization as a whole. In January and February of the year 1933, when the last decisive struggle against this barbarism was being fought out in Germany, had Germany been defeated in that struggle and had the Bolshevic field of destruction and death extended over Central Europe, then perhaps a different opinion would have arisen on the banks of the Thames as to the nature of this terrible menace to humanity. For since it is said that England must be defended on the frontier of the Rhine she would then have found herself in close contact with that harmless democratic world of Moscow, whose innocence they are always trying to impress upon us.

Here I should like to state the following once again: — The teaching of Bolshevism is that there must be a world revolution, which would mean world-destruction. If such a doctrine were accepted and given equal rights with other teachings in Europe, this would mean that Europe would be delivered over to it. As far as Germany itself is concerned, let there be no doubts on the following points: — 1 We look on Bolshevism as a world peril for which there must be no toleration. It is in accordance with this attitude of ours that we should avoid close contact with the carriers of these poisonous bacilli. And that is also the reason why we do not want to have any closer relations with them beyond the necessary political and commercial relations; for if we went beyond these we might thereby run the risk of closing the eyes of our people to the danger itself. I consider Bolshevism the most malignant poison that can be given to a people.

And therefore I do not want my own people to come into contact with this teaching. As a citizen of this nation I myself shall not do what I should have to condemn my fellow-citizens for doing. I demand from every German workman that he shall not have any relations with these international mischief-makers and he shall never see me clinking glasses or rubbing shoulders with them. Moreover, any further treaty connections with the present Bolshevic Russia would be completely worthless for us. It is out of the question to think that National Socialist Germany should ever be bound to protect Bolshevism or that we, on our side, should ever agree to accept the assistance of a Bolshevic State. For I fear that the moment any nation should agree to accept such assistance, it would thereby seal its own doom.

I must also say here that I do not accept the opinion which holds that in the moment of peril the League of nations could come to the rescue of the member States and hold them up by the arms, as it were. Eden stated in his last address that deeds and not speeches are what matters. On that point I should like to call attention to the fact that up to now the outstanding feature of the League of Nations has been talk rather than action. There was one exception and in that case it would probably have been better to have been content with talk. In this one case, as might have been foreseen, action was fruitless. Hence, just as I have been forced by economic circumstances to depend on our own resources principally for the maintenance of my people, so also I have been forced in the political sphere.

And we ourselves are not to blame for that. Three times I have made concrete offers for armament restriction or at least armament limitation. These offers were rejected. In this connection I may recall the fact that the greatest offer which I then made was that Germany and France together should reduce their standing armies to 300,000 men; that Germany, Great Britain and France, should bring down their air force to parity and that Germany and Great Britain should conclude a naval agreement. Only the last offer was accepted and it was the only contribution in the world to a real limitation of armaments. The other German proposals were either flatly refused or were answered by the conclusion of those alliances which gave Central Europe to Soviet Russia as the field of play for its gigantic forces.

Eden speaks of German armaments and expects a limitation of these armaments. We ourselves proposed this limitation long ago. But it had no effect because, instead of accepting our proposal, treaties were made whereby the greatest military power in the world was, according to the terms of the treaties and in fact, introduced into Central Europe. In speaking of armaments it would be well to mention in the first instance the armaments possessed by that Power which sets the standard for the armaments of all others. Eden believes that in the future all States should possess only the armament which is necessary for their de fence. I do not know whether and how far Mr.

Eden has sounded Moscow on the question of carrying that excellent idea into effect, and I do not know what assurances they have given from that quarter. I think however that I ought to put forward one point in this connection. Each nation has the right to judge this for itself, and it alone has the right. If therefore Great Britain today decides for herself on the extent of her armaments everybody in Germany will understand her action; for we can only think of London alone as being competent to decide on what is necessary for the protection of the British Empire. On the other hand I should like to insist that the estimate of our protective needs, and thus of the armament that is necessary for the de fence of our people, is within our own competency and can be decided only in Berlin. I believe that the general recognition of these principles will not render conditions more difficult but will help to release tension.

Anyhow Germany is pleased at having found friends in Italy and Japan who hold the same views as ourselves and we should be still more pleased if these convictions were widespread in Europe. Therefore nobody welcomed more cordially than we did the manifest lessening of tension in the Mediterranean, brought about by the Anglo-Italian agreement. We believe that this will first of all lead to an understanding which may put a stop to, or at least limit, the catastrophe from which poor Spain is suffering. Germany has no interests in that country except the care of those commercial relations which Mr. Eden himself declares to be so important and useful. Our sympathies with General Franco and his Government are in the first place of a general nature and, secondly, they arise from a hope that the consolidation of a real National Spain may lead to a strengthening of economic possibilities in Europe.

We are ready to do everything which in any way may contribute towards the restoration of order in Spain. But I think that the following considerations should not be left out of account: — During the last hundred years a number of new nations have been created in Europe which formerly, because of their disunion and weakness, were of only small economic importance and of no political importance at all. Through the establishment of these new States new tensions have naturally arisen. True statesmanship however must face realities and not shirk them. The Italian nation and the new Italian State are realities. The German nation and the German Reich are likewise realities.

And for my my own fellow citizens I should like to state that the Polish nation and the Polish State have also become realities. Also in the Balkans nations have reawakened and have built their own States. The people who belong to those States want to live and they will live. The unreasonable division of the world into nations that have and nations that have not will not remove or solve that problem, no more than the internal social problems of the nations can be simply solved through more or less clever phrases. For thousands of years the nations asserted their vital claims by the use of power. If in our time some other institution is to take the place of this power for the purpose or regulating relations between the peoples, then it must take account of natural vital claims and decide accordingly.

It is the task of the League of Nations only to guarantee the existing state of the world and to safeguard it for all time, then we might just as well entrust it with the task of regulating the ebb and flow of the tides or directing the Gulf Stream into a definite course for the future. But the League of Nations will not be able to do the one or the other. The continuance of its existence will in the long run depend on the extent to which it realize that the necessary reforms which concern international relations must be carefully considered and put into practice. The German people once built up a colonial Empire without robbing anyone and without violating any treaty. And they did so without any war. That colonial Empire was taken away from us.

And the grounds on which it was sought to excuse this act are not tenable. First: It was said that the natives did not want to belong to Germany. Who asked them if they wished to belong to some other Power? And when were these natives ever asked if they had been contented with the Power that formerly ruled them? Second: It is stated that the colonies were not administered properly by the Germans. Now, Germany had these colonies only for a few decades.

Great sacrifices were made in building them up and they were in a process of development which would have led to quite different results than in 1914. But anyhow the colonies had been so developed by us that other people considered it worth while to engage in a sanguinary struggle for the purpose of taking them from us. Third: It is said that they are of no real value. If that is the case then they can be of no value to other States also. And so it is difficult to see why they keep them. Moreover, Germany has never demanded colonies for military purposes, but exclusively for economic purposes.

It is obvious that in times of general prosperity the value of certain territories may decrease, but it is just as evident that in times of distress such value increases. Today Germany lives in a time of difficult struggle for foodstuffs and raw materials. Sufficient imports are conceivable only if there be a continued and lasting increase in our exports. Therefore, as a matter of course, our demand for colonies for our densely populated country will be put forward again and again. In concluding my remarks on this subject I should like to note a few points concerning the possible ways which may lead to a general pacification of Europe, which might also be extended outside Europe. They are the most important conditions for lasting and solid economic and political relations between the peoples.

A few weeks ago we saw how an organized band of international war mongers spread a mass of lies which almost succeeded in raising mistrust between two nations and might easily have led to worse consequences than actually followed. I greatly regret that the British Foreign Secretary did not categorically state that there was not one word of truth in those calumnies about Morocco which had been spread by these international war mongers. Thanks to the loyalty of a foreign diplomat and his Government, it was possible to clear up this extraordinary situation immediately. Supposing another case arose in which it turned out impossible to establish the truth so readily, what then would happen? Germany is hoping to have close and friendly relations with Italy. May we succeed in paving the way for such relations with other European countries.

The German Reich will watch over its security and honor with its strong army. On the other hand, convinced that there can be no greater treasure for Europe than peace, it will always be a reasonable supporter of those European ideals of peace and will be always conscious of its responsibilities. This would lead to a decisive lessening of tension between the nations who are forced to live side by side, and whose State frontiers are not identical with the ethnical frontiers. In concluding these remarks I should like to deal with the document which the British Government addressed to the German Government on the occasion of the occupation of the Rhineland. I should like first to state that we believe and are convinced that the British Government at that time did everything to avoid an increase of tension in the European crisis, and that the document in question owes its origin entirely to the desire to make a contribution towards disentangling the situation of those days. Nevertheless, it was not possible for the German Government, for reasons which the Government of Great Britain will appreciate, to reply to those questions.

We preferred to settle some of those questions in the most natural way by the practical building up of our relations with our neighbors. I believe that this statement will be understood by all. Moreover, with all my heart I hope that the intelligence and goodwill of responsible European Governments will succeed, despite all opposition, in preserving peace for Europe. Peace is our dearest treasure. Whatever contributions Germany can make towards preserving it, these she will make. Before concluding my address today I should like to give a short sketch of the tasks that lie ahead of us.

In the carrying out of the Four Years Plan lies our first task. It will call for gigantic efforts but eventually it will turn out a great blessing for our people. Its purpose is to strengthen our national economic system in all its branches. The execution of it is guaranteed. All those great works which have been started apart from this plan will be continued. Their purpose is to promote the health of the nation and make life more pleasant.

Building extensions will be systematically carried out in some of our large cities, as an externalization of the spirit that actuates this great plan. And that order will be based on such spacious plans as will be worthy of the National Socialist Movement and also of the German metropolis. We have allotted a period of twenty years for the carrying out of this plan.

In Poland there ruled no democracy, but a man; and with him I succeeded, in precisely twelve months, in coming to an agreement which, for ten years in the first instance, entirely removed the danger of a conflict. We are all convinced that this agreement will bring lasting pacification. We realise that here are two peoples which must live together and neither of which can do away with the other. A people of 33 millions will always strive for an outlet to the sea. A way for understanding, then, had to be found; it has been found; and it will be ever further extended. Certainly things were hard in this area. The nationalities and small national groups frequently quarrelled among themselves. But the main fact is that the two Governments, and all reasonable and clear-sighted persons among the two peoples and in the two countries, possess the firm will and determination to improve their relations. It was a real work of peace, of more worth than all the chattering in the League of Nations Palace at Geneva. There can scarcely be any difference of opinion to-day among the true friends of peace with regard to the value of this agreement. One only needs to ask oneself what might have happened to Europe if this agreement, which brought such relief, had not been entered into five years ago. In signing it, this great Polish marshal and patriot rendered his people just as great a service as the leaders of the National Socialist State rendered the German people. During the troubled months of the past year the friendship between Germany and Poland was one of the reassuring factors in the political life of Europe. The German and Polish statements regarding these negotiations are to be found in the annexed documents. Here, too, the Peace Treaty of Versailles-of course intentionally-inflicted a most severe wound on Germany. The strange way in which the Corridor giving Poland access to the sea was marked out was meant, above all, to prevent for all time the establishment of an understanding between Poland and Germany. This problem is-as I have already stressed-perhaps the most painful of all problems for Germany. Nevertheless, I have never ceased to uphold the view that the necessity of a free access to the sea for the Polish State cannot be ignored, and that as a general principle, valid for this case, too, nations which Providence has destined or, if you like, condemned to live side by side would be well advised not to make life still harder for each other artificially and unnecessarily.

Я не удивлюсь, если в XXI веке национал-социализм победит в России. За годы этой войны я вынужден был пересмотреть свое расовое мировоззрение. Вот что я Вам скажу, никто здесь, в Европе, не знает Россию и никогда ее не знал. Я вовсе не идеализирую русских, отнюдь, в русских все-таки слишком много азиатского. Но факт остается фактом, русская нация оказалась сильнее и выносливее в этой безумной войне, и я не удивлюсь, если спасение для белой расы придет с Востока. Это будет логично. Гитлер «Когда мы создадим Великую Германию, о нас могут думать все что угодно. У нас нет никакой необходимости цепляться за буржуазные понятия чести и морального облика. То, что они делают, виновато скрывая от других, мы делаем с чистой совестью», — заявил однажды Гитлер. Нет более тупых людей, чем американцы. Они никогда не смогут сражаться как герои. Чем грандиознее ложь, тем легче ей готовы поверить. Говоря о завоевании мира, мы не можем не обращать внимания на шестую часть суши. Только фанатичная толпа легко управляема. Кто разрушает дело Божие, тот ополчается против воли Божьей. Удар молота судьбы, опрокидывающий одного, натыкается вдруг на сталь у другого. Даже если вы тысячу раз признаете нас виновными, вечный суд истории оправдает нас и со смехом выбросит вердикт вашего суда. Если какая-нибудь страна, подобно России, отгораживается от всего мира,то лишь с целью лишить своих граждан возможностей для сравнения. Никогда ещё в истории ни одно государство не было создано мирной хозяйственной деятельностью. Победителя никто не спросит, правду он говорил или нет. Перед лицом великой цели никакие жертвы не покажутся слишком большими. Только безыдейные и слабоумные люди могут считать, что те или иныегосударственные границы на нашей земле являются чем-то навекинезыблемым и не подлежащим изменениям. Я пришёл в этот мир не для того, чтобы сделать людей лучше, а для того, чтобы использовать их слабости. Воспитать широкие массы народа в национальном духе можно только на путях поднятия их социального уровня. Люди бывают склонны приносить жертвы лишь тогда, когда они могутдействительно ждать успеха, а не тогда, когда бесцельность этих жертвочевидна. Светские школы недопустимы, так как в таких школах нет религиозногообучения, а общее нравственное обучение без религиозного основаниязиждится на пустоте; следовательно, воспитание личности и религиядолжны основываться на Вере. Нам нужные верующие люди. Сила христианства состояла например вовсе не в попытках соглашения ипримирения, скажем, с близкими ему философскими мнениями древних. Она состояла в непреклонной фанатической защите только одного своегособственного учения. Каждый художник, который изображает небо зелёным, а траву голубой, должен быть подвергнут стерилизации. Чтобы излечить какую-либо болезнь, надо сначала понять, каковы её возбудители. То же самое относится и к лечению политических болезней. Никогда нельзя встретить лисы, которая обнаруживала бы какие-нибудь гуманные намерения по отношению к гусю, как никогда мы не встретим кошки, склонной к дружбе с мышами. Пока я руковожу партией, она не будет дискуссионным клубом для безродных литераторов и салонных большевиков. В последнем счете всегда побеждает только инстинкт самосохранения. Поддавлением этого инстинкта вся так называемая человечность, являющаясятолько выражением чего-то среднего между глупостью, трусостью исамомнением, тает как снег на весеннем солнце. Высшей целью человечества является ни в коем случае не сохранениеданной государственной формы или тем более данного правительства, асохранение народного начала. Грехи против крови и расы являються самыми страшными грехами на этом свете. Нация, которая предаётся этим грехам, обречена. Будь то Ветхий Завет или Новый, нет никакой разницы: всё то же старое еврейское надувательство.

К 1921 году Гитлер стал лидером партии, переименовав ее в Национал-социалистическую немецкую рабочую партию, или НСДАП часто сокращенно называемую нацистской партией. В 1933 году Гитлер был назначен канцлером Германии, и в течение нескольких лет установил авторитарное правление, известное как Третий Райх. Гитлер был известен своей агрессивной внешней политикой и убеждением в расовой превосходственности арийцев.

Адольф Гитлер цитаты и высказывания.

Hitler im Reichstag am 1. September 1939 Quelle: Bundesarchiv Koblenz. Звук с фразой "Гитлер капут" на немецком языке (мужской голос). В первую очередь из-за знаменитой фразы Гитлера в 1936 году, когда он наперекор всем приказал войти в демилитаризованную Рейнскую о6ласть. Фразы Гитлера на немецком языке имеют большое значение, потому что они отражают его идеологию и политические убеждения. Reichstag Speech, May 21, 1935. "We recognize, with the understanding and the heartfelt friendship of true Nationalists, the Polish State as the home of a great, nationally-conscious people." "The German Reich and, in particular, the present German Government, have no other wish than to live on friendly. Представляю вам подборку цитат лидера нацистской Германии Адольфа Гитлера (1889 — 1945).

Adolf Hitler Speeches

Скажите какая из фраз вам больше всего понравилась? Оставьте свое мнение в комментарии под роликом. Подписывайтесь на канал, и не забудьте поставить колокольчик. Впереди вас ждет много чего интересного и полезного.

Речь 10. Также и народом являются только те, кто способен, если потребуется, выступить как единый народ навстречу любым испытаниям. Я создал … совершенно новое движение. Движение, которое с самого своего зарождения и вопреки всем явлениям распада в окружавшей его действительности вновь созидало народную общность.

Лишь в этом случае государство способно полноценно выполнять свои социальные обязательства. Истинную ценность любому движению придают только люди. Люди, которые, руководствуясь смыслом этого движения, воплощают его идеи в жизнь. Речь 07.

Речь 05. В структурах, которым принадлежит реальная власть, под «свободой» подразумевается их возможность грабить широкие массы населения, без каких-либо ограничений, и не встречая хоть сколько-нибудь серьезного сопротивления. Речь 28. Инструменты финансового еврейства.

Речь 21. Герой стал презираем, трус — почитаем; добросовестность оказалась наказуема, нерадивость — вознаграждаема. Приличного человека уже не ждало ничего, кроме насмешек; опустившийся же, наоборот, стал образцом для подражания. Сила стала вызывать осуждение, слабость — восхищение.

Полноценность человеческой личности перестала что-либо значить. Ее место заняло количество, численность, то есть восторжествовала неполноценность, ущербность. Степень бессовестности в обливании грязью исторического прошлого стала сравнима разве что со степенью беззаботности в отречении от исторического будущего для своего народа. Речь 30.

Путин умалчивает о том, что бегство польского правительства произошло после того, как в ночь на 17 сентября на территорию Польши вторглись советские войска. Утром в этот день послу Польши в СССР вручили ноту за подписью наркома иностранных дел Вячеслава Молотова: «Польское правительство распалось и не проявляет признаков жизни. Это значит, что Польское государство и его правительство фактически перестали существовать. Предоставленная самой себе и оставленная без руководства, Польша превратилась в удобное поле для всяких случайностей и неожиданностей, могущих создать угрозу для СССР.

Поэтому, будучи доселе нейтральным, советское правительство не может более нейтрально относиться к этим фактам, а также к беззащитному положению украинского и белорусского населения. Ввиду такой обстановки советское правительство отдало распоряжение Главному командованию Красной Армии дать приказ войскам перейти границу и взять под свою защиту жизнь и имущество населения Западной Белоруссии, Западной Украины». В этот момент польское правительство еще находилось в стране, но после получения ноты сочло ситуацию безнадежной и к вечеру бежало в Румынию. Это краеугольный камень нацистской партии, который в итоге неизбежно привёл нацистскую Германию на путь массовых убийств.

Ведь уже само существование евреев построено на той большой лжи, будто евреи представляют собою не расу, а только религиозную общину. Не стоит также забывать, что Mein Kampf, как и все манифесты, был написан для широкого распространения, это не дневниковая запись сокровенных мыслей Гитлера. Фразы на немецком языке О необходимости учить не просто слова иностранного языка, а целые фразы — вы уже слышали много раз и , наверняка, не сомневаетесь в пользе этого. Например, вам нужно сказать на немецком самую обыкновенную фразу: «наша очередь подходит».

Вроде бы и слово «очередь» знаете, и «подходит» — вполне знакомое.

He who opposed such encroachment is an enemy of the State and according to democratic conceptions of the State, an outlaw. The so-called nation of the Czechs has thus been selected by Providence, which in this case made use of those who once designed Versailles, to see that no one rose against this purpose of the State. Should, however, some one belonging to the majority of the oppressed people of this nation protest against this, the nation may knock him down with force and kill him if it is necessary or desired.

But it is something most natural that compels us Germans to take an interest in this problem. Among the majority of nationalities that are being suppressed in this State there are 3,500,000 Germans. These Germans, too, are creatures of God. The Almighty did not create them that they should be surrendered by a State construction made at Versailles to a foreign power that is hateful to them, and He has not created 7,000,000 Czechs in order that they should supervise 3,500,000 Germans or act as guardians for them and still less to do them violence and torture.

The conditions in this nation are unbearable, as is generally known. Politically more than 3,500,000 people were robbed in the name of the right of self-determination of a certain Mr. Wilson of their self-determination and of their right to self-determination. Economically these people were deliberately ruined and afterward handed over to a slow process of extermination.

These truths cannot be abolished by phrases. They are testified to by deeds. The misery of the Sudeten Germans is without end. They want to annihilate them.

They are being oppressed in an inhuman and intolerable manner and treated in an undignified way. When 3,500,000 who belong to a people of almost 80,000,000 are not allowed to sing any song that the Czechs do not like because it does not please the Czechs or are brutally struck for wearing white stockings because the Czechs do not like it, and do not want to see them, and are terrorized or maltreated because they greet with a form of salutation that is not agreeable to them, although they are greeting not Czechs but one another, and when they are pursued like wild beasts for every expression of their national life. This may be a matter of indifference to several representatives of our democracies or they may possibly even be sympathetic because it concerns only 3,500,000 Germans. I can only say to representatives of the democracies that this is not a matter of indifference to us.

And I say that if these tortured creatures cannot obtain rights and assistance by themselves, they can obtain both from us. An end must be made of depriving these people of their rights. I have already said this quite clearly in my speech of February 22. It was a short-sighted piece of work when the statesmen at Versailles brought the abnormal structure of Czechoslovakia into being.

It was possible to violate the demands of millions of another nationality only so long as the brother nation itself was suffering from the consequences of general maltreatment by the world. To believe that such a regime could go on sinning without hindrance forever was possible only through a scarcely credible degree of blindness. I declared in my speech of February 22 before the Reichstag that the Reich would not tolerate any further continued oppression of 3,500,000 Germans, and I hope that the foreign statesmen will be convinced that these were no mere words. The National Socialist State has consented to very great sacrifices indeed, very great national sacrifices for the sake of European peace; not only has it not cherished so-called thoughts of revenge, but on the contrary it has banished them from all its public and private life.

As always, I attempted to bring about, by the peaceful method of making proposals for revision, an alteration of this intolerable position. It is a lie when the outside world says that we only tried to carry through our revisions by pressure. For twenty years there was the opportunity for the Czechoslovak government of carrying out these revisions by peaceful settlements and understanding. All these proposals, as you know, have been rejected by the Czechs - proposals of giving the Sudeten German minority a humane treatment and the respect they deserve.

Мир - это книга. Кто никогда не путешествует, видит только одну её страницу. Billy Graham Самый опасный из всех наркотиков - это успех. Ничего в мире так не заразительно, как смех и хорошее настроение. Тяжелее разрушить предвзятое мнение, чем расщепить атом. Sitzt man jedoch eine Minute auf einem heissen Ofen, meint man, es waren zwei Stunden. Das ist Relativitat. Если сидеть два часа рядом с , кажется, это прошла минута. Если же посидеть минуту на горячей плите, покажется, что прошло два часа.

Это и есть относительность. Лучшие вещи в - это не те, которые можно получить за. Paul Thomas Mann Религия — это благоговение — в первую очередь перед тайной, которую представляет собой человек. В тот момент, когда человек сомневается в и ценности , он болен. Sie konnen schwimmen. Heinz Ruhmann Проблемы не тонут в алкоголе. Они умеют плавать. Хайнц Рюман Wer immer tut, was er schon kann, bleibt immer das, was er schon ist. Henry Ford Кто всегда делает то, что он уже умеет, остаётся всегда тем, кем он уже является.

Генри Форд Habe Mut, dich deines eigenen Verstandes zu bedienen. Автомобили и транспорт. Дом и дача.

Фразы на немецком Гитлера — история и значения

Франц Ксавер фон Баадер Для качественного перевода текстов широкой тематики рекомендую обращаться в компанию «Е-Перевод» Begeisterung ist ein guter Treibstoff, doch leider verbrennt er zu schnell. Albert Schweitzer Вдохновение - хорошее топливо, но, к сожалению, оно слишком быстро сгорает. Albert Schweitzer Единственно важное в жизни - это следы , которые мы оставляем, когда идём. Ambrose Bierce Циник - это человек, который видит вещи такими, какие они есть, и не видит, какими они должны быть. Liebe ist vor allem geistigseelisch. Для многих людей именуется. Не может быть без духовного влечения, но это еще не значит, что она превращается в бледное, бестелесное, платоническое влечение. Телесная близость должна быть воплощением духовной близости и духовного влечения.

Wer es zuerst tut, ist verloren. Alles was du im Leben brauchst ist Ignoranz und Uberzeugung, und der Erfolg wird dir sicher sein. У каждого, как у луны, есть темная сторона , которую он никому не показывает. Man vergisst vielleicht, wo man die Friedenspfeife vergraben hat. Aber man vergisst niemals, wo das Beil liegt. Вероятно, можно забыть, где закопана трубка мира. Но никогда не забывают, где лежит топор.

Тот, кто много знает, стремиться к ясности; тот, кто хочет показать, что много знает, стремиться во тьму. То, что делается из , всегда находится по ту сторону и. Надежда — это радуга над падающим вниз ручейком. Wer nie reist, sieht nur eine Seite davon. Мир - это книга. Кто никогда не путешествует, видит только одну её страницу.

Unfortunately, this desire for unity has not hitherto been declared or listened to. And now the desire is an illusion. For the fact is that the division into two halves, not only of Europe but also of the whole world, is an accomplished fact. It is to be regretted that the British Government did not adopt its present attitude at an earlier date, that under all circumstances a division of Europe must be avoided; for then the Treaty of Versailles would not have been entered into. This Treaty brought in the first division of Europe, namely a division of the nations into victors on the one side and vanquished on the other, the latter nations being outlawed. Through this division of Europe nobody suffered more than the German people. That this division was wiped out, so far as concerns Germany, is essentially due to the National Socialist Revolution and this brings some credit to myself. The second division has been brought about by the proclamation of the Bolshevic doctrine, an integral feature of which is that they do not confine it to one nation but try to impose it on all the nations. Here it is not a question of a special form of national life in Russia but of the Bolshevic demand for a world revolution. If Mr. Eden does not look at Bolshevism as we look at it, that may have something to do with the position of Great Britain and also with some happenings that are unknown to us. But I believe that nobody will question the sincerity of our opinions on this matter, for they are not based merely on abstract theory. For Mr. Eden Bolshevism is perhaps a thing which has its seat in Moscow, but for us in Germany this Bolshevism is a pestilence against which we have had to struggle at the cost of much bloodshed. It is a pestilence which tried to turn our country into the same kind of desert as is now the case in Spain; for the habit of murdering hostages began here, in the form in which we now see it in Spain. National Socialism did not try to come to grips with Bolshevism in Russia, but the Jewish international Bolshevics in Moscow have tried to introduce their system into Germany and are still trying to do so. Against this attempt we have waged a bitter struggle, not only in defence of our own civilization but in defence of European civilization as a whole. In January and February of the year 1933, when the last decisive struggle against this barbarism was being fought out in Germany, had Germany been defeated in that struggle and had the Bolshevic field of destruction and death extended over Central Europe, then perhaps a different opinion would have arisen on the banks of the Thames as to the nature of this terrible menace to humanity. For since it is said that England must be defended on the frontier of the Rhine she would then have found herself in close contact with that harmless democratic world of Moscow, whose innocence they are always trying to impress upon us. Here I should like to state the following once again: — The teaching of Bolshevism is that there must be a world revolution, which would mean world-destruction. If such a doctrine were accepted and given equal rights with other teachings in Europe, this would mean that Europe would be delivered over to it. As far as Germany itself is concerned, let there be no doubts on the following points: — 1 We look on Bolshevism as a world peril for which there must be no toleration. It is in accordance with this attitude of ours that we should avoid close contact with the carriers of these poisonous bacilli. And that is also the reason why we do not want to have any closer relations with them beyond the necessary political and commercial relations; for if we went beyond these we might thereby run the risk of closing the eyes of our people to the danger itself. I consider Bolshevism the most malignant poison that can be given to a people. And therefore I do not want my own people to come into contact with this teaching. As a citizen of this nation I myself shall not do what I should have to condemn my fellow-citizens for doing. I demand from every German workman that he shall not have any relations with these international mischief-makers and he shall never see me clinking glasses or rubbing shoulders with them. Moreover, any further treaty connections with the present Bolshevic Russia would be completely worthless for us. It is out of the question to think that National Socialist Germany should ever be bound to protect Bolshevism or that we, on our side, should ever agree to accept the assistance of a Bolshevic State. For I fear that the moment any nation should agree to accept such assistance, it would thereby seal its own doom. I must also say here that I do not accept the opinion which holds that in the moment of peril the League of nations could come to the rescue of the member States and hold them up by the arms, as it were. Eden stated in his last address that deeds and not speeches are what matters. On that point I should like to call attention to the fact that up to now the outstanding feature of the League of Nations has been talk rather than action. There was one exception and in that case it would probably have been better to have been content with talk. In this one case, as might have been foreseen, action was fruitless. Hence, just as I have been forced by economic circumstances to depend on our own resources principally for the maintenance of my people, so also I have been forced in the political sphere. And we ourselves are not to blame for that. Three times I have made concrete offers for armament restriction or at least armament limitation. These offers were rejected. In this connection I may recall the fact that the greatest offer which I then made was that Germany and France together should reduce their standing armies to 300,000 men; that Germany, Great Britain and France, should bring down their air force to parity and that Germany and Great Britain should conclude a naval agreement. Only the last offer was accepted and it was the only contribution in the world to a real limitation of armaments. The other German proposals were either flatly refused or were answered by the conclusion of those alliances which gave Central Europe to Soviet Russia as the field of play for its gigantic forces. Eden speaks of German armaments and expects a limitation of these armaments. We ourselves proposed this limitation long ago. But it had no effect because, instead of accepting our proposal, treaties were made whereby the greatest military power in the world was, according to the terms of the treaties and in fact, introduced into Central Europe. In speaking of armaments it would be well to mention in the first instance the armaments possessed by that Power which sets the standard for the armaments of all others. Eden believes that in the future all States should possess only the armament which is necessary for their de fence. I do not know whether and how far Mr. Eden has sounded Moscow on the question of carrying that excellent idea into effect, and I do not know what assurances they have given from that quarter. I think however that I ought to put forward one point in this connection. Each nation has the right to judge this for itself, and it alone has the right. If therefore Great Britain today decides for herself on the extent of her armaments everybody in Germany will understand her action; for we can only think of London alone as being competent to decide on what is necessary for the protection of the British Empire. On the other hand I should like to insist that the estimate of our protective needs, and thus of the armament that is necessary for the de fence of our people, is within our own competency and can be decided only in Berlin. I believe that the general recognition of these principles will not render conditions more difficult but will help to release tension. Anyhow Germany is pleased at having found friends in Italy and Japan who hold the same views as ourselves and we should be still more pleased if these convictions were widespread in Europe. Therefore nobody welcomed more cordially than we did the manifest lessening of tension in the Mediterranean, brought about by the Anglo-Italian agreement. We believe that this will first of all lead to an understanding which may put a stop to, or at least limit, the catastrophe from which poor Spain is suffering. Germany has no interests in that country except the care of those commercial relations which Mr. Eden himself declares to be so important and useful. Our sympathies with General Franco and his Government are in the first place of a general nature and, secondly, they arise from a hope that the consolidation of a real National Spain may lead to a strengthening of economic possibilities in Europe. We are ready to do everything which in any way may contribute towards the restoration of order in Spain. But I think that the following considerations should not be left out of account: — During the last hundred years a number of new nations have been created in Europe which formerly, because of their disunion and weakness, were of only small economic importance and of no political importance at all. Through the establishment of these new States new tensions have naturally arisen. True statesmanship however must face realities and not shirk them. The Italian nation and the new Italian State are realities. The German nation and the German Reich are likewise realities. And for my my own fellow citizens I should like to state that the Polish nation and the Polish State have also become realities. Also in the Balkans nations have reawakened and have built their own States. The people who belong to those States want to live and they will live. The unreasonable division of the world into nations that have and nations that have not will not remove or solve that problem, no more than the internal social problems of the nations can be simply solved through more or less clever phrases. For thousands of years the nations asserted their vital claims by the use of power. If in our time some other institution is to take the place of this power for the purpose or regulating relations between the peoples, then it must take account of natural vital claims and decide accordingly. It is the task of the League of Nations only to guarantee the existing state of the world and to safeguard it for all time, then we might just as well entrust it with the task of regulating the ebb and flow of the tides or directing the Gulf Stream into a definite course for the future. But the League of Nations will not be able to do the one or the other. The continuance of its existence will in the long run depend on the extent to which it realize that the necessary reforms which concern international relations must be carefully considered and put into practice. The German people once built up a colonial Empire without robbing anyone and without violating any treaty. And they did so without any war. That colonial Empire was taken away from us. And the grounds on which it was sought to excuse this act are not tenable. First: It was said that the natives did not want to belong to Germany. Who asked them if they wished to belong to some other Power? And when were these natives ever asked if they had been contented with the Power that formerly ruled them? Second: It is stated that the colonies were not administered properly by the Germans. Now, Germany had these colonies only for a few decades. Great sacrifices were made in building them up and they were in a process of development which would have led to quite different results than in 1914. But anyhow the colonies had been so developed by us that other people considered it worth while to engage in a sanguinary struggle for the purpose of taking them from us. Third: It is said that they are of no real value. If that is the case then they can be of no value to other States also. And so it is difficult to see why they keep them. Moreover, Germany has never demanded colonies for military purposes, but exclusively for economic purposes. It is obvious that in times of general prosperity the value of certain territories may decrease, but it is just as evident that in times of distress such value increases. Today Germany lives in a time of difficult struggle for foodstuffs and raw materials. Sufficient imports are conceivable only if there be a continued and lasting increase in our exports. Therefore, as a matter of course, our demand for colonies for our densely populated country will be put forward again and again. In concluding my remarks on this subject I should like to note a few points concerning the possible ways which may lead to a general pacification of Europe, which might also be extended outside Europe. They are the most important conditions for lasting and solid economic and political relations between the peoples. A few weeks ago we saw how an organized band of international war mongers spread a mass of lies which almost succeeded in raising mistrust between two nations and might easily have led to worse consequences than actually followed. I greatly regret that the British Foreign Secretary did not categorically state that there was not one word of truth in those calumnies about Morocco which had been spread by these international war mongers. Thanks to the loyalty of a foreign diplomat and his Government, it was possible to clear up this extraordinary situation immediately. Supposing another case arose in which it turned out impossible to establish the truth so readily, what then would happen? Germany is hoping to have close and friendly relations with Italy. May we succeed in paving the way for such relations with other European countries. The German Reich will watch over its security and honor with its strong army. On the other hand, convinced that there can be no greater treasure for Europe than peace, it will always be a reasonable supporter of those European ideals of peace and will be always conscious of its responsibilities. This would lead to a decisive lessening of tension between the nations who are forced to live side by side, and whose State frontiers are not identical with the ethnical frontiers. In concluding these remarks I should like to deal with the document which the British Government addressed to the German Government on the occasion of the occupation of the Rhineland. I should like first to state that we believe and are convinced that the British Government at that time did everything to avoid an increase of tension in the European crisis, and that the document in question owes its origin entirely to the desire to make a contribution towards disentangling the situation of those days. Nevertheless, it was not possible for the German Government, for reasons which the Government of Great Britain will appreciate, to reply to those questions. We preferred to settle some of those questions in the most natural way by the practical building up of our relations with our neighbors. I believe that this statement will be understood by all. Moreover, with all my heart I hope that the intelligence and goodwill of responsible European Governments will succeed, despite all opposition, in preserving peace for Europe. Peace is our dearest treasure. Whatever contributions Germany can make towards preserving it, these she will make. Before concluding my address today I should like to give a short sketch of the tasks that lie ahead of us. In the carrying out of the Four Years Plan lies our first task. It will call for gigantic efforts but eventually it will turn out a great blessing for our people. Its purpose is to strengthen our national economic system in all its branches. The execution of it is guaranteed. All those great works which have been started apart from this plan will be continued. Their purpose is to promote the health of the nation and make life more pleasant. Building extensions will be systematically carried out in some of our large cities, as an externalization of the spirit that actuates this great plan. And that order will be based on such spacious plans as will be worthy of the National Socialist Movement and also of the German metropolis. We have allotted a period of twenty years for the carrying out of this plan. May the Almighty God grant us a time of peace in which to bring this gigantic work to completion. But this work will only be the counterpart of a general cultural development which we wish to see taking place in Germany, as the crowning achievement to the restoration of our internal and external freedom. And, finally, it will be one of our future tasks to give the German people a Constitution which will be in harmony with the real life of our people, as that life has developed politically. This Constitution will place its seal on this life for all time to come and will be an imperishable and fundamental law for all Germans. As I look back on the great work that has been done during the past four years you will understand quite well that my first feeling is simply one of thankfulness to our Almighty God for having allowed me to bring this work to success. He has blessed our lab ours and has enabled our people to come through all the obstacles which encompassed them on their way. I have had three extraordinary friends in my life. In my youth it was Poverty, which was my companion for many years. When the Great War came to a close it was the profound anguish that I felt over the downfall of our people. This anguish seized me and determined the path I had to follow. Since January 30th. From that time this anxiety has never left my side and will probably remain a faithful companion until the end of my days.

Часть государств дала себя провести этим, приняла обещанные гарантии, предложенные попутно с этим утверждением, и таким образом перекинулась на новый фронт окружения, направленный против Германии. При таких обстоятельствах я счел долгом перед своей совестью и перед историей германского народа не только уверить эти страны и их правительства в ложности сделанных Англией заявлений, но, сверх того, успокоить сильнейшую Восточную Державу путем специальных и торжественных заявлений относительно пределов наших интересов. Вы все чувствовали в свое время, что этот шаг был для меня горьким и тяжелым. Германский народ никогда не питал враждебных чувств по отношению к народностям России. Однако свыше двух десятков лет еврейско-большевистская власть в Москве старается разжечь пожар не только в Германии, но и во всей Европе. Не Германия пыталась перенести свое национал-социалистическое мировоззрение в Россию, а еврейско-большевистские власти в Москве беспрестанно пытались навязать свое господство нашему и другим европейским народам и делали это не только в моральном смысле, но, прежде всего, также и в смысле военной мощи. Однако последствиями деятельности этого режима были лишь хаос, бедствия и голод. В противовес этому, я старался в течение двух десятков лет с минимумом вмешательства и без всякого нарушения нашей продукции1 добиться нового социалистического порядка в Германии, который бы не только устранил безработицу, но также предоставлял прибыль труда в возрастающей мере трудящимся людям. Достижения этой политики создания нового экономического и социального порядка в нашем народе, который, планомерно преодолевая сословные и классовые контрасты, стремится к конечной цели — создать истинную народную общность, являются единственными в мире. Поэтому в августе 1939 г. Я сделал это исключительно в сознании своей ответственности по отношению к германскому народу, но, прежде всего, в надежде на возможность все же в конце достигнуть длительного примирения и уменьшения жертв, которые иначе могли быть от нас потребованы. Наряду с торжественными заверениями Германии в Москве относительно упомянутых областей и стран — за исключением Литвы — как лежащих за пределами германских политических интересов, было достигнуто особое соглашение на случай, если Англии действительно удастся втравить Польшу в войну против Германии. Но также и здесь имело место ограничение германских требований, которое было не пропорционально достижениям германского оружия. В немецком оригинале: «безо всякого нарушения нашего производства» — «ohne jene Zerstoerung unserer Produktion» S. Результаты этого договора, желаемого мной и заключенного в интересах германского народа, были особенно тяжелы для немцев, живущих в затронутых им странах. Более полумиллиона германских соотечественников -мелкие крестьяне, ремесленники и рабочие — были принуждены почти в течение одной ночи покинуть свою прежнюю родину, чтобы избежать нового режима, угрожающего им непосредственно беспредельными бедствиями, а раньше или позже полным уничтожением. Несмотря на это, тысячи немцев исчезли! Было невозможно даже установить постигшую их судьбу или же хотя бы их местопребывание. В их числе находятся свыше 160 человек германских подданных. Я молчал в ответ на все это, так как я должен был молчать! Моим желанием было достигнуть окончательного примирения и, если возможно, длительного согласия с этим государством. Однако, уже во время нашего похода в Польшу, советские власть имущие вдруг потребовали — противно договору — также и Литву. Германия никогда не имела намерения занимать Литву и не только не ставила таких ультиматумов литовскому правительству, но, напротив, отклонила просьбу тогдашнего литовского правительства — прислать с этой целью германские войска как образ действия, не соответствующий целям германской политики. Несмотря на это, я покорился и этому новому русскому требованию. Однако это было лишь началом новых шантажирований1, которые постоянно повторялись с тех пор. В немецком оригинале «новых случаев давления» — «neuer Erpressungen» S. Победа в Польше, достигнутая исключительно благодаря германским войскам, побудила меня вновь обратиться к западным державам с предложением мира. Оно было отклонено благодаря интернациональным и еврейским подстрекателям к войне. Однако причина этого отказа уже тогда заключалась в том, что Англия все еще надеялась быть в состоянии создать европейскую коалицию против Германии, включая в нее Балканы и Советскую Россию. Так, в Лондоне было решено послать г. Криппса1 послом в Москву. Ему было поручено определенное задание вновь заняться англо-советскими отношениями и развивать их в английском духе. Английская пресса сообщала об успехах этого задания, поскольку ее не заставляли молчать тактические причины. Осенью 1939 г. Приступая к военному порабощению не только Финляндии, но также и балтийских государств, Россия вдруг мотивировала эти действия в такой же мере ложным, как и смешным заявлением, что она принуждена защищать эти страны от чужой угрозы, которую она должна предупредить. Под этим могла подразумеваться только Германия. Ибо никакая другая держава не могла ни вторгнуться, ни вести войну в прибалтийских областях. И все же я должен был молчать. Однако власть имущие в Кремле сейчас же пошли дальше. В то время, как Германия весной 1940 г.

The National Socialist State has consented to very great sacrifices indeed, very great national sacrifices for the sake of European peace; not only has it not cherished so-called thoughts of revenge, but on the contrary it has banished them from all its public and private life. As always, I attempted to bring about, by the peaceful method of making proposals for revision, an alteration of this intolerable position. It is a lie when the outside world says that we only tried to carry through our revisions by pressure. For twenty years there was the opportunity for the Czechoslovak government of carrying out these revisions by peaceful settlements and understanding. All these proposals, as you know, have been rejected by the Czechs - proposals of giving the Sudeten German minority a humane treatment and the respect they deserve. You know the proposals that I have made to fulfill the necessity of restoring German sovereignty over German territories. You know the endless attempts I made for a peaceful clarification and understanding of the problem of Austria. It was all in vain. I must here state something definitely; German has kept these obligations; the minorities who live in Germany are not persecuted. No Frenchman can stand up and say that any Frenchman living in the Saar territory is oppressed, tortured, or deprived of his rights. Nobody can say this. For six months I have calmly watched developments, although I never ceased to give warnings. In the last few days I have increased these warnings. I left no doubt that people who wanted to compare the Germany of to-day with the former Germany would be deceiving themselves. An attempt was made to justify the oppression of the Germans by claiming that they had committed acts of provocation. I do not know in what these provocations on the part of women and children consist, if they themselves are maltreated, in some cases killed. One thing I do know - that no great Power can with honour long stand by passively and watch such events. I made one more final effort to accept a proposal for mediation on the part of the Italian Government. Mussolini proposed a conference of the major powers in Munich. Mussolini agreed on the cession to Germany of the Sudeten German territory and the measures consequent thereon, and by this agreement the Czechoslovak government was to be hold responsible for the steps necessary to secure its fulfilment. For a whole day I sat in my Government and waited to see whether the Czech government would abide to the agreement the major powers of Europe had concluded in order to prevent a major war in Europe. Deputies, if the German Government and its Leader patiently endured such treatment Germany would deserve only to disappear from the political stage. But I am wrongly judged if my love of peace and my patience are mistaken for weakness or even cowardice. I, therefore, decided last night and informed the British Government that in these circumstances I can no longer find any willingness on the part of the Czechoslovak Government to conduct serious negotiations with us. These proposals for mediation have failed because in the meanwhile there, first of all, came as an answer the sudden Czechoslovak general mobilization, followed by more Czech atrocities. These were again repeated last night. Recently there have been as many as twenty-one incidents in which Czech military formations have killed innocent Sudeten Germans without provocations. Last night there were fourteen, of which one was quite serious. I have, therefore, resolved to speak to Czechoslovakia in the same language that Czechoslovakia for months past has used toward us and the Sudeten German minority. This attitude on the part of the Reich will not change. The other European States understand in part our attitude.

Цитаты Адольфа Гитлера

Rome became the city of art after the end of the Punic Wars, and Germany built her cathedrals, as in Worms, Speyer and Limburg, when the German Empire under Salians had achieved its greatest triumphs. We can follow this connection to our time. We know that art, for example the beauty of German towns, always depended on political development of these towns; that it was political considerations which moved Napoleon III to regulating of the Boulevards and Friedrich the Great to establishing Unter den Linden. Similarly in Munich where it was obvious that the city could not become an industrial center and so art was chosen to elevate the rank of the city, which now everyone who wants to get to know Germany must visit. The case was similar with other arts. The moment the small, powerless statelets began to unite into one state, then also one German art, proud of itself, began to grow. The works of Richard Wagner appeared in the period when shame and powerlessness were replaced by a unified, great German Reich.

And so, not just art is dependent on the state, on the politics of the state; the same is the case with work itself because only a sound state is in the position to give the opportunity of working to its citizens and let them use their talents. The opposite is the case with the race in relation to everything else. A state with a rotten, sick and unsound race will never produce great works of art or make great politics, or at least bask in abundance. Each of these factors depends on the others. And only when all of them complement each other, can we say: There is harmony in the state, the way we Germanics understand it. Can the Jew build a state?

Now we have to ask ourselves the question: How about the Jew as a state builder? Does the Jew possess the power to create a state? First we must examine his attitude to work, find out how he perceives the principle of work, and excuse me if I now take a book called The Bible. I am not claiming that all its contents are necessarily true, as we know that Jewry was very liberal in writing it. One thing, however, is certain: it has not been written by an antisemite. Laughter It is very important because no antisemite would have been able to write a more terrible indictment against the Jewish race than the Bible, the Old Testament.

Ladies and Gentlemen! Already here we see that the whole world lies between us; we could never conceive of work as a punishment — otherwise we would all have been convicts. We do not want to conceive of work as punishment. I must confess: I would not have been able to exist without work, and hundreds of thousands and millions would have been able to withstand perhaps 3 or 5 days, maybe even 10, but not 90 or 100 days without any activity. If Paradise really existed, the Land of Plenty, then our people would have been unhappy in it. Calls: Hear, hear We Germans seek constantly a possibility to do something and if we cannot find anything, at least from time to time we hit one another in the face.

Laughter We are unable to bear absolute rest. Thus we see, already here, a big difference. Because a Jew has written this, true or not is unimportant because it still reflects the opinion which Jewry has about work. For them work is not an obvious ethical duty but at most a means to sustenance. In our eyes, this is not work because in this case any activity serving self-preservation, without regard to fellow men, might be called work. And we know that this work, in the past, consisted of plundering of caravans, and today in planned plundering of indebted farmers, industrialists and workers.

The form has changed but the principle is the same. We do not call it work, but robbery. Calls: Hear, hear When already such a basic notion separates us, here comes another. I have already explained that in the long period in the North the races became purified. This means that all the inferior and weak gradually died out and only the soundest remained. Also, here the Jew differs from us because he has not become purified but instead practiced inbreeding; he multiplied greatly but only in narrow circles, and without selection.

And therefore we see a generation which is plagued by defects caused by inbreeding. Finally, the Jew does not possess the third factor: The inner spiritual life. I do not need to explain here what a Jew generally looks like. You all know him. Laughter You know his constant restlessness that never gives him a possibility to concentrate and have a spiritual experience. In the most solemn moments he flickers his eyes and one can see that even during the most beautiful opera he is calculating dividends.

Laughter The Jew has never had his own art. Hear, hear His own temple has been built by foreign builders: The first was the Assyrians, and for the building of the second — the Roman artists. He has not left anything which might be called art, no buildings, nothing. We shall not conceal that today he has many famous conductors whose fame he can thank the well-organized Jewish Press for. Laughter When a nation does not possess these three traits, it is not able to create states. And that is true because throughout centuries the Jew was always a nomad.

He has never had what we might call a state. On the one side, there was always a great chasm between the tribes of Judah and Caleb and the northern Israeli tribes, and only David, for the first time, succeeded in gradually bridging the chasm through the unitary cult of Yahweh. We know precisely that this cult has at a very late time chosen for itself Jerusalem as its sole seat. Only from that moment have the Jewish people gotten a center, like Berlin or New York or Warsaw today. Because a people which does not want to work — the often hard work of building and maintaining a state — to work in mines, factories, in construction etc. Such a people will never establish a state but prefers to live in some other state where others work and he acts as an intermediary in business, a dealer in the best case, or in good German — a robber, a nomad who undertakes robbing raids just like in ancient times.

Lively bravo! Efforts are made to explain that so and so many Jews have been found that want to go there as farmers, workers, even soldiers. Laughter If these people really have this urge in themselves, Germany today needs these ideal men as turf cutters and coal miners; they could take part in building our water power plants, our lakes etc. The whole Zionist state will be nothing else than the perfect high school for their international criminals, and from there they will be directed. And every Jew will, of course, have immunity as a citizen of the Palestinian state Laughter and he will of course keep our citizenship. But when caught red-handed, he will not be a German Jew any longer but a citizen of Palestine.

Laughter One can almost say that the Jew cannot help it because everything stems from his race. A Jew is everywhere a Jew; consciously or unconsciously, he resolutely represents the interests of his race. Thus we can see the two great differences between races: Aryanism means ethical perception of work and that which we today so often hear — socialism, community spirit, common good before own good. Jewry means egoistic attitude to work and thereby mammonism and materialism, the opposite of socialism. He cannot do otherwise, whether he wants to or not. And thereby he is unable to create his own state because it requires a lot of social sense.

He is only able to live as a parasite in the states of others. He lives as a race amongst other races, in a state within others states. And we can see very precisely that when a race does not possess certain traits which must be hereditary, it not only cannot create a state but must act as a destroyer, no matter if a given individual is good or evil. The Jewish path of destruction We can follow this fate of Jewry from the earliest prehistory. It is not important if there is truth in every word of the Bible. In general, it gives us at least an extract of the history of Jewry.

We see how the Jews present themselves because the Jew wrote these words quite innocuously. It did not appear to him as outrageous when a race, through cunning and deceit, invaded and despoiled other races, was always finally expelled and, unoffended, sought to repeat the same elsewhere. They pimped and haggled even when it came to their ideals, always ready to offer even their own families. We know that not long ago a gentleman was staying here, Sigmund Fraenkel, who has just written that it is quite unjust to accuse Jews of a materialistic spirit. One should only look at their sunny family life. However, this intimate family life did not prevent Grandfather Abraham from pimping off his own wife to the Pharaoh of Egypt in order to be able to do business.

Laughter As was the grandfather, so was the father and so were the sons who never neglected their business. And you can be sure that they are not neglecting the business even as we speak. Who among you was a soldier, he will remember Galicia or Poland: There, at the train stations, these Abrahams were everywhere. Laughter and hand clapping They penetrated into other races for millennia. And we know very well that wherever they stayed long enough symptoms of decay appeared and the peoples could do nothing else than to liberate themselves from the uninvited guest or to disappear themselves. Heavy plagues came over the nations, no less then ten in Egypt — the same plague we experience today firsthand — and finally the Egyptians lost their patience.

When the chronicler describes that the Jews were suffering when they finally left, we know differently, for as soon as they were out, they began to long after coming back. Laughter It seems that they did not have it so badly. And just as you are not going to see this race voluntarily do it, so there was nothing left to the Egyptians but to force them. What hundreds of thousands of others do as a matter of course, means for the Jew another chapter of suffering and persecution. Still later, the Jew was able to infiltrate the then soaring Roman Empire. We can still see his traces in southern Italy.

Already 250 years before Christ he was there in all places, and people began to avoid them. Already, then and there, he made the most important decision and became a trader.

It was a short-sighted piece of work when the statesmen at Versailles brought the abnormal structure of Czechoslovakia into being. It was possible to violate the demands of millions of another nationality only so long as the brother nation itself was suffering from the consequences of general maltreatment by the world. To believe that such a regime could go on sinning without hindrance forever was possible only through a scarcely credible degree of blindness. I declared in my speech of February 22 before the Reichstag that the Reich would not tolerate any further continued oppression of 3,500,000 Germans, and I hope that the foreign statesmen will be convinced that these were no mere words. The National Socialist State has consented to very great sacrifices indeed, very great national sacrifices for the sake of European peace; not only has it not cherished so-called thoughts of revenge, but on the contrary it has banished them from all its public and private life.

As always, I attempted to bring about, by the peaceful method of making proposals for revision, an alteration of this intolerable position. It is a lie when the outside world says that we only tried to carry through our revisions by pressure. For twenty years there was the opportunity for the Czechoslovak government of carrying out these revisions by peaceful settlements and understanding. All these proposals, as you know, have been rejected by the Czechs - proposals of giving the Sudeten German minority a humane treatment and the respect they deserve. You know the proposals that I have made to fulfill the necessity of restoring German sovereignty over German territories. You know the endless attempts I made for a peaceful clarification and understanding of the problem of Austria. It was all in vain.

I must here state something definitely; German has kept these obligations; the minorities who live in Germany are not persecuted. No Frenchman can stand up and say that any Frenchman living in the Saar territory is oppressed, tortured, or deprived of his rights. Nobody can say this. For six months I have calmly watched developments, although I never ceased to give warnings. In the last few days I have increased these warnings. I left no doubt that people who wanted to compare the Germany of to-day with the former Germany would be deceiving themselves. An attempt was made to justify the oppression of the Germans by claiming that they had committed acts of provocation.

I do not know in what these provocations on the part of women and children consist, if they themselves are maltreated, in some cases killed. One thing I do know - that no great Power can with honour long stand by passively and watch such events. I made one more final effort to accept a proposal for mediation on the part of the Italian Government. Mussolini proposed a conference of the major powers in Munich. Mussolini agreed on the cession to Germany of the Sudeten German territory and the measures consequent thereon, and by this agreement the Czechoslovak government was to be hold responsible for the steps necessary to secure its fulfilment. For a whole day I sat in my Government and waited to see whether the Czech government would abide to the agreement the major powers of Europe had concluded in order to prevent a major war in Europe. Deputies, if the German Government and its Leader patiently endured such treatment Germany would deserve only to disappear from the political stage.

But I am wrongly judged if my love of peace and my patience are mistaken for weakness or even cowardice. I, therefore, decided last night and informed the British Government that in these circumstances I can no longer find any willingness on the part of the Czechoslovak Government to conduct serious negotiations with us. These proposals for mediation have failed because in the meanwhile there, first of all, came as an answer the sudden Czechoslovak general mobilization, followed by more Czech atrocities. These were again repeated last night. Recently there have been as many as twenty-one incidents in which Czech military formations have killed innocent Sudeten Germans without provocations.

История править Нацистское приветствие является вариантом так называемого « римского салюта » — приветственного жеста итальянских фашистов , позже заимствованного национал-социалистами [2]. Отличие двух салютов заключается в том, что при римском салюте рука идёт к приветственному жесту от сердца, в то время как в нацистском приветствии она идёт сразу вверх от любого положения руки [3] [4].

Гитлер приветствует марширующих штурмовиков Группа нацистских лидеров. Как официальное название часто использовался термин «немецкое приветствие». До этого оно было факультативным, и большинство военных использовало стандартное воинское приветствие , употребляя гитлеровское приветствие только в ответ на такое же обращение со стороны чинов партии или СС. Зиг хайль!

And here the state of affairs at the present moment is not such that the outside world would be able to place huge orders with us or offer prospects of an increase in the exchange of goods even if we were to fulfil the most extraordinary conditions that they might lay down.

Matters should not be made more complicated than they already are. But Germany cannot be blamed for these two things, and especially not National Socialist Germany. When we assumed power the world economic crisis was worse than it is today. I fear however that I must interpret Mr. Therefore I wish it to be clearly understood that our decision to carry out this plan is unalterable.

The reasons which led to that decision were inexorable. And since then I have not been able to discover anything whatsoever that might induce us to discontinue the four years plan. I shall take only one practical example: In carrying out the four years plan our synthetic production of rubber and petrol will necessitate an annual increase in our consumption of coal by a margin of something between 20 and 30 million tons. This means that an extra quota of thousands of coal miners are assured of employment for the rest of their active lives. I must really take the liberty of asking this question: Supposing we abondon [sic] the German four years plan, then what statesman can guarantee me some economic equivalent or other, outside of the Reich, for these thirty million tons of coal?

I want bread and work for my people. And certainly I do not wish to have it through the operation of credit guarantees, but through solid and permanent lab our, the products of which I can either exchange for foreign goods or for domestic goods in our internal commercial circulation. If by some manipulation or other Germany were to throw these 20 or 30 million tons of coal annually on the international market for the future, the result would be that the coal exports of other countries would have to decrease. I do not know if a British statesman, for example, could face such a contingency without realizing how serious it would be for his own nation. And yet that is the state of affairs.

Germany has an enormous number of men who not only want to work but also to eat. And the standard of living among our people is high. I cannot build the future of the German nation on the assurances of a foreign statesman or on any international help, but only on the real basis of a steady production, for which I must find a market at home or abroad. Perhaps my skepticism in these matters leads me to differ from the British Foreign Secretary in regard to the optimistic tone of his statements. I mean here that if Europe does not awaken to the danger of the Bolshevic infection, then I fear that international commerce will not increase but decrease, despite all the good intentions of individual statesmen.

For this commerce is based not only on the undisturbed and guaranteed stability of production in one individual nation but also on the production of all the nations together. One of the first things which is clear in this matter is that every Bolshevic disturbance must necessarily lead to a more or less permanent destruction of orderly production. Therefore my opinion about the future of Europe is, I am sorry to say, not so optimistic as Mr. I am the responsible leader of the German people and must safeguard its interests in this world as well as I can. And therefore I am bound to judge things objectively as I see them.

I should not be acquitted before the bar of our history if I neglected something—no matter on what grounds—which is necessary to maintain the existence of this people. I am pleased, and we are all pleased, at every increase that takes place in our foreign trade. But in view of the obscure political situation I shall not neglect anything that is necessary to guarantee the existence of the German people, although other nations may become the victims of the Bolshevic infection. And I must also repudiate the suggestion that this view is the outcome of mere fancy. For the following is certainly true: The British Foreign Secretary opens out theoretical prospects of existence to us, whereas in reality what is happening is totally different.

The revolutionizing of Spain, for instance, has driven out 15. Should this revolutionizing of Spain spread to other European countries then these damages would not be lessened but increased. I also am a responsible statesman and I must take such possibilities into account. Therefore it is my unalterable determination so to organize German lab our that it will guarantee the maintenance of my people. Eden may rest assured that we shall utilize every possibility offered us of strengthening our economic relations with other nations, but also that we shall avail ourselves of every possibility to improve and enrich the circulation of our own internal trade.

I must ask also whether the grounds for assuming that Germany is pursuing a policy of isolation are to be found in the fact that we have left he League of Nations. If such be the grounds, then I would point out that the Geneva League has never been a real League of peoples. A number of great nations do not belong to it or have left it. And nobody has on this account asserted that they were following a policy of isolation. I think therefore that on this point Mr.

Eden misunderstands our intentions and views. For nothing is farther from our wishes than to break off or weaken our political or economic relations with other nations. I have already tried to contribute towards bringing about a good understanding in Europe and I have often given, especially to the British people and their Government, assurance of how ardently we wish for a sincere and cordial cooperation with them. I admit that on one point there is a wide difference between the views of the British Foreign Secretary and our views; and here it seems to me that this is a gap which cannot be filled up. Eden declares that under no circumstances does the British Government wish to see Europe torn into two halves.

Unfortunately, this desire for unity has not hitherto been declared or listened to. And now the desire is an illusion. For the fact is that the division into two halves, not only of Europe but also of the whole world, is an accomplished fact. It is to be regretted that the British Government did not adopt its present attitude at an earlier date, that under all circumstances a division of Europe must be avoided; for then the Treaty of Versailles would not have been entered into. This Treaty brought in the first division of Europe, namely a division of the nations into victors on the one side and vanquished on the other, the latter nations being outlawed.

Through this division of Europe nobody suffered more than the German people. That this division was wiped out, so far as concerns Germany, is essentially due to the National Socialist Revolution and this brings some credit to myself. The second division has been brought about by the proclamation of the Bolshevic doctrine, an integral feature of which is that they do not confine it to one nation but try to impose it on all the nations. Here it is not a question of a special form of national life in Russia but of the Bolshevic demand for a world revolution. If Mr.

Eden does not look at Bolshevism as we look at it, that may have something to do with the position of Great Britain and also with some happenings that are unknown to us. But I believe that nobody will question the sincerity of our opinions on this matter, for they are not based merely on abstract theory. For Mr. Eden Bolshevism is perhaps a thing which has its seat in Moscow, but for us in Germany this Bolshevism is a pestilence against which we have had to struggle at the cost of much bloodshed. It is a pestilence which tried to turn our country into the same kind of desert as is now the case in Spain; for the habit of murdering hostages began here, in the form in which we now see it in Spain.

National Socialism did not try to come to grips with Bolshevism in Russia, but the Jewish international Bolshevics in Moscow have tried to introduce their system into Germany and are still trying to do so. Against this attempt we have waged a bitter struggle, not only in defence of our own civilization but in defence of European civilization as a whole. In January and February of the year 1933, when the last decisive struggle against this barbarism was being fought out in Germany, had Germany been defeated in that struggle and had the Bolshevic field of destruction and death extended over Central Europe, then perhaps a different opinion would have arisen on the banks of the Thames as to the nature of this terrible menace to humanity. For since it is said that England must be defended on the frontier of the Rhine she would then have found herself in close contact with that harmless democratic world of Moscow, whose innocence they are always trying to impress upon us. Here I should like to state the following once again: — The teaching of Bolshevism is that there must be a world revolution, which would mean world-destruction.

If such a doctrine were accepted and given equal rights with other teachings in Europe, this would mean that Europe would be delivered over to it. As far as Germany itself is concerned, let there be no doubts on the following points: — 1 We look on Bolshevism as a world peril for which there must be no toleration. It is in accordance with this attitude of ours that we should avoid close contact with the carriers of these poisonous bacilli. And that is also the reason why we do not want to have any closer relations with them beyond the necessary political and commercial relations; for if we went beyond these we might thereby run the risk of closing the eyes of our people to the danger itself. I consider Bolshevism the most malignant poison that can be given to a people.

And therefore I do not want my own people to come into contact with this teaching. As a citizen of this nation I myself shall not do what I should have to condemn my fellow-citizens for doing. I demand from every German workman that he shall not have any relations with these international mischief-makers and he shall never see me clinking glasses or rubbing shoulders with them. Moreover, any further treaty connections with the present Bolshevic Russia would be completely worthless for us. It is out of the question to think that National Socialist Germany should ever be bound to protect Bolshevism or that we, on our side, should ever agree to accept the assistance of a Bolshevic State.

For I fear that the moment any nation should agree to accept such assistance, it would thereby seal its own doom. I must also say here that I do not accept the opinion which holds that in the moment of peril the League of nations could come to the rescue of the member States and hold them up by the arms, as it were. Eden stated in his last address that deeds and not speeches are what matters. On that point I should like to call attention to the fact that up to now the outstanding feature of the League of Nations has been talk rather than action. There was one exception and in that case it would probably have been better to have been content with talk.

In this one case, as might have been foreseen, action was fruitless. Hence, just as I have been forced by economic circumstances to depend on our own resources principally for the maintenance of my people, so also I have been forced in the political sphere. And we ourselves are not to blame for that. Three times I have made concrete offers for armament restriction or at least armament limitation. These offers were rejected.

In this connection I may recall the fact that the greatest offer which I then made was that Germany and France together should reduce their standing armies to 300,000 men; that Germany, Great Britain and France, should bring down their air force to parity and that Germany and Great Britain should conclude a naval agreement. Only the last offer was accepted and it was the only contribution in the world to a real limitation of armaments. The other German proposals were either flatly refused or were answered by the conclusion of those alliances which gave Central Europe to Soviet Russia as the field of play for its gigantic forces. Eden speaks of German armaments and expects a limitation of these armaments. We ourselves proposed this limitation long ago.

But it had no effect because, instead of accepting our proposal, treaties were made whereby the greatest military power in the world was, according to the terms of the treaties and in fact, introduced into Central Europe. In speaking of armaments it would be well to mention in the first instance the armaments possessed by that Power which sets the standard for the armaments of all others. Eden believes that in the future all States should possess only the armament which is necessary for their de fence. I do not know whether and how far Mr. Eden has sounded Moscow on the question of carrying that excellent idea into effect, and I do not know what assurances they have given from that quarter.

I think however that I ought to put forward one point in this connection. Each nation has the right to judge this for itself, and it alone has the right. If therefore Great Britain today decides for herself on the extent of her armaments everybody in Germany will understand her action; for we can only think of London alone as being competent to decide on what is necessary for the protection of the British Empire. On the other hand I should like to insist that the estimate of our protective needs, and thus of the armament that is necessary for the de fence of our people, is within our own competency and can be decided only in Berlin. I believe that the general recognition of these principles will not render conditions more difficult but will help to release tension.

Anyhow Germany is pleased at having found friends in Italy and Japan who hold the same views as ourselves and we should be still more pleased if these convictions were widespread in Europe. Therefore nobody welcomed more cordially than we did the manifest lessening of tension in the Mediterranean, brought about by the Anglo-Italian agreement. We believe that this will first of all lead to an understanding which may put a stop to, or at least limit, the catastrophe from which poor Spain is suffering. Germany has no interests in that country except the care of those commercial relations which Mr. Eden himself declares to be so important and useful.

Our sympathies with General Franco and his Government are in the first place of a general nature and, secondly, they arise from a hope that the consolidation of a real National Spain may lead to a strengthening of economic possibilities in Europe. We are ready to do everything which in any way may contribute towards the restoration of order in Spain. But I think that the following considerations should not be left out of account: — During the last hundred years a number of new nations have been created in Europe which formerly, because of their disunion and weakness, were of only small economic importance and of no political importance at all. Through the establishment of these new States new tensions have naturally arisen. True statesmanship however must face realities and not shirk them.

The Italian nation and the new Italian State are realities. The German nation and the German Reich are likewise realities. And for my my own fellow citizens I should like to state that the Polish nation and the Polish State have also become realities. Also in the Balkans nations have reawakened and have built their own States. The people who belong to those States want to live and they will live.

The unreasonable division of the world into nations that have and nations that have not will not remove or solve that problem, no more than the internal social problems of the nations can be simply solved through more or less clever phrases. For thousands of years the nations asserted their vital claims by the use of power. If in our time some other institution is to take the place of this power for the purpose or regulating relations between the peoples, then it must take account of natural vital claims and decide accordingly. It is the task of the League of Nations only to guarantee the existing state of the world and to safeguard it for all time, then we might just as well entrust it with the task of regulating the ebb and flow of the tides or directing the Gulf Stream into a definite course for the future. But the League of Nations will not be able to do the one or the other.

The continuance of its existence will in the long run depend on the extent to which it realize that the necessary reforms which concern international relations must be carefully considered and put into practice. The German people once built up a colonial Empire without robbing anyone and without violating any treaty. And they did so without any war. That colonial Empire was taken away from us. And the grounds on which it was sought to excuse this act are not tenable.

First: It was said that the natives did not want to belong to Germany. Who asked them if they wished to belong to some other Power? And when were these natives ever asked if they had been contented with the Power that formerly ruled them? Second: It is stated that the colonies were not administered properly by the Germans. Now, Germany had these colonies only for a few decades.

Great sacrifices were made in building them up and they were in a process of development which would have led to quite different results than in 1914. But anyhow the colonies had been so developed by us that other people considered it worth while to engage in a sanguinary struggle for the purpose of taking them from us. Third: It is said that they are of no real value. If that is the case then they can be of no value to other States also. And so it is difficult to see why they keep them.

Адольф Гитлер Цитаты о мужчинах

• Полный текст обращения Гитлера к немецкому народу 22 июня 1941 года: d_34 — LiveJournal
• Цитаты гитлера на немецком
• Фразы гитлера на немецком языке
• Adolf Hitler Issues Comment on the "Jewish Question" | Holocaust Encyclopedia
• Известные фразы гитлера. Цитаты на немецком языке с переводом
• Адольф Гитлер цитаты

Фразы на немецком Гитлера — история и значения

Цитаты Гитлера все скажут сами за себя. Wir wollen nicht lügen und wollen nicht schwindeln. Ich habe deshalb es abgelehnt, jemals vor dieses Volk hinzutreten und billige Versprechungen zu geben. In uns selbst allein liegt die Zukunft des deutschen Volkes. Wenn wir selbst dieses deutsche Volk emporführen zu eigener Arbeit, zu eigenem. Фразы Гитлера на немецком языке имеют большое значение, потому что они отражают его идеологию и политические убеждения. Die große Zeit ist jetzt angebrochen. Deutschland ist nun erwacht. Die Macht haben wir nun in Deutschland gewonnen, nun gilt es das deutsche Volk zu gewinnen. Ich weiß, obwohl die hundert tausenden von euch die ihr jetzt zuhört in ganz Deutschland das in hundertausenden von euch in.

Цитаты гитлера на немецком с переводом. Немецкие крылатые выражения в русском языке

In seiner Ansprache vor dem deutschen Reichstag am 1. September 1939 rechtfertigte Reichskanzler Adolf Hitler den deutschen Angriff auf Polen. Die Rede war nicht nur an die anwesenden Reichstagsabgeordneten gerichtet: Durch Radioübertragung und Übersetzungen wurde Sorge. По одной из них, данная фраза была в письме Гитлера главе берлинского отделения СС Курту Далюге. По одной из них, данная фраза была в письме Гитлера главе берлинского отделения СС Курту Далюге. Wir wollen nicht lügen und wollen nicht schwindeln. Ich habe deshalb es abgelehnt, jemals vor dieses Volk hinzutreten und billige Versprechungen zu geben. In uns selbst allein liegt die Zukunft des deutschen Volkes. Wenn wir selbst dieses deutsche Volk emporführen zu eigener Arbeit, zu eigenem. Цитаты Гитлера на немецком языке напоминают о трагических событиях и важности мира. причем в оригинале, русский перевод с купюрами я уже.

Известные фразы гитлера. Цитаты на немецком языке с переводом

Jeder hat mich belogen, sogar die SS! Армия мне лжет! Все мне лгут, даже СС! Was Sie da sagen, ist ungeheuerlich. Sie ist ohne Ehre!

И именно это является единственным оправданием для не марксистского социализма! Мне нет нужды добавлять, что социал-демократия, в свою очередь, прокладывает дорогу коммунизму. Сила же внутренней организации народа, в свою очередь, зависит от твердости общей позиции по известным основополагающим вопросам. Все больше евреев проскальзывает в семьи сильных мира сего, подсовывая им еврейских жен. Результатом явилось то, что за короткое время именно руководящий слой общества стал абсолютно чужд своему собственному народу.

Во-первых, германец во всех смыслах устроен покрепче, чем еврей. Во-вторых, народ, за спасение которого было заплачено двумя миллионами погибших в Мировой войне, обязательно найдет в себе силы отомстить за каждую жизнь, погубленную врагами внешними, и за каждую смерть, обессмысленную предателями и преступниками в тылу. Приложение к «Программе Адольфа Гитлера»: Изречения Адольфа Гитлера Многие поддались внушению и предпочитают более не замечать, что евреи являются отдельной обособленной расой. Однако, найдется ли еще хоть один народ, который, расселившись по всему миру, продолжал бы оказывать поддержку представителям своей расы с такой же исступленной решимостью, как это делают евреи? Зато чужих культур они уничтожили сотни. Чтобы «стать» немцем, ему пришлось бы отказаться от своей принадлежности к еврейству. Что для него абсолютно невозможно. Внутренне еврей не может органично влиться в немецкую национальную среду по целому ряду причин: 1. Это должно сплотить тех, в ком еще бьется немецкое сердце и жива любовь к своему народу, и поднять их на борьбу против общего заклятого врага всех арийцев.

Семья … это самая малая, но и самая ценная составная часть во всей структуре государства. Но рождение и воспитание ребенка приносит женщине еще больше — дает ей право называться высоким именем матери. Наоборот, наша идея направлена только и исключительно на осознание задачи, поставленной перед нами самой жизнью: спасение и сохранение нашего собственного народа средствами, адекватными сложившемуся положению. Интервью 03. Потому что наша нынешняя молодежь имеет равные возможности в жизни, вместе марширует, вместе поет песни нашего Движения и Отечества, и верит в Германию, принадлежащую только ей. Их мы с самого начала будем воспитывать в духе совершенно иных идеалов, и, прежде всего, мы научим их видеть друг в друге товарищей. И здесь ценится количество, а не качество. Всезнайство, которое чаще всего оказывается «липовым», — враг эффективной деятельности. Помимо приобретения твердых практических знаний нам нужно развитие инстинктивного и воспитание воли.

Другими словами, должно вырасти поколение целостных людей, способных ясным разумом познавать вечные законы развития, сознательно стремясь пробудить в себе древнее инстинктивное знание. И здесь мы также не ограничились одной лишь теорией. Трудно себе даже представить, в какой основательной чистке нуждалась Германия до того, как мы занялись ею несколько месяцев назад! Однако, очищение — длительный процесс, требующий продолжения. Высокий смысл физической работы заключается в том, что именно в ней с особой ясностью проявляются такие качества, как трудолюбие и ответственность. Интервью 18. Речь 08. Приложение к «Речам Адольфа Гитлера»: Изречения Адольфа Гитлера В тот день, когда обе идеи национализм и социализм сольются в одну, они станут непобедимы. Ни те, ни другие не могут существовать друг без друга.

Они — единое целое, из которого и должен выкристаллизоваться новый человек — человек грядущего Германского Рейха. Лишь в этом случае государство способно полноценно выполнять свои социальные обязательства. Капитал — не хозяин государства, а его слуга. Музыку же в этом заведении заказывают … исключительно евреи. И если возродится немецкий народ, будет восстановлено и все остальное. Кровь и раса вновь станут источником художественного вдохновения. И борьба эта была ни чем иным, как бунтом одной пришлой национальной группы, прочно обосновавшейся внутри нашего народа, но так и не научившейся уважать ни гостеприимных хозяев, ни их культуру. Нездоровая расовая психология данной группы населения изначально предопределила постоянный конфликт некоторых ее представителей с окружающей их иной национальной средой, без малейшей попытки взаимопонимания и преодоления своей культурной инородности. К сожалению, именно такие, не вполне адекватные, представители еврейской интеллектуальной элиты и занялись немецкой культурой, пытаясь переделать ее под себя.

Древние греки и римляне оказались вдруг так близки германцам потому, что все три народа своими этническими корнями уходят в общую расовую основу. Так, благодаря расовому родству, бессмертные свершения древних народов вновь и вновь оказывают свое благотворное влияние на дела их потомков. Правительству не мешало бы позаботиться о том, чтобы его народ не подвергался регулярному и целенаправленному отравлению. Требовать этого — естественное право народа, базирующееся на его сознании, на традиционном представлении о плохом и хорошем. То, что вредит народу, должно быть устранено. Тому, кто отрекается от нации, внутри которой он живет, нет в ней места. Мы обязаны требовать, чтобы пресса стала инструментом национального самовоспитания. И те представители народа, которым свойственны эти качества, обязательно заявят о себе. Именно они делают историю.

Когда на карту поставлено само выживание народа, тогда уже не годятся ни народные представительства, ни парламенты, ни местные самоуправления. Тогда могут спасти лишь сильные личности. Я говорю от имени всего немецкого народа, когда заявляю, что все мы преисполнены искреннего желания искоренить былую вражду, приведшую к жертвам, несоизмеримыми ни с какими возможными победами или приобретениями. Он был построен не на завоевании, не за счет чужих народов. Его процветание явилось результатом постоянного труда, несказанного усердия и неисчислимых забот наших собственных людей. И все же внутренне мы были бедны, раздроблены и разобщены. Народ, который больше не знал, как должно распоряжаться своим богатством. Это не делает Англию принципиальным врагом Германии, однако и не позволяет упускать ее из вида, как весьма настойчивого претендента на главенствующую роль в Европе. Ради этого двадцать шесть народов мира были хладнокровно натравлены друг на друга той самой прессой, которая практически вся находится в собственности только у одного всемирного народца евреев , только у одной расы — смертельного врага любого национального государства!

Ни кайзер, ни правительство, ни народ этой войны не хотели! Вновь и вновь нас настигают рецидивы упадка. Причины всегда одни и те же. Немец, поддавшийся внутренней слабости, утративший душевное равновесие, с распыленной волей и уже неспособный на поступок, становится бессилен бороться за свою собственную жизнь. Вот тут-то, как раз, и начинаются всякого рода абстрактные мечтания о правах, вместо практического их отстаивания. А тем временем, пока он витает в облаках, на земле у него выбивают почву из-под ног, и отбирают вполне конкретную собственность. Поэтому сегодня им не стоит жаловаться на нас. Заслуженного ими сполна возмездия пока еще не последовало. Мстить поверженному врагу — не в наших традициях.

Но если бы мы действительно захотели им отомстить — нам следовало бы ликвидировать их десятками тысяч! Как раз наоборот, он относится к той категории политических документов, в которых победители диктуют побежденным размеры и сроки выплаты грабительской дани. А такие « мирные договора » всегда несут в себе зародыш будущих войн. Открытое письмо от 14. Этот договор нужен для того, чтобы отправить на тот свет еще двадцать миллионов немцев и окончательно погубить немецкую нацию. Напротив, такой договор должен быть направлен на скорейшее рубцевание и исцеление этих ран. Этот мирный договор ежегодно уносил жизни двадцати тысяч немцев. Этих людей просто лишали всех средств к существованию, не оставляя им ни малейшего шанса выжить, - и все ради того, чтобы, не дай Бог, не задержать выплату очередной порции дани победителям. Зато у многих миллионов людей этот фарс неизбежно должен был вызвать чувство ненависти к такому мировому порядку, при котором возможна постоянная диффамация и дискриминация великого народа только за то, что однажды его постигло несчастье проиграть, после героического сопротивления, навязанную ему войну.

На трон же низвергнутых королей и царей шустро вскарабкался галицийский еврей. Невозможно совершить революцию, с действительно далеко идущими последствиями, если сам народ внутренне к ней не стремится. И когда я сравниваю то, что происходит у нас в Германии, с теми ужасами, которые творились, например, во времена Французской революции 1789 года , я с полным правом могу сказать: мы-то, уж во всяком случае, не изобретали и не расставляли по всей стране гильотин, и не устраивали в Германии никаких Вандей! Мы ограничились тем, что изолировали от основной, здоровой, части нации лишь самые недостойные ее элементы. Мы были вынуждены сделать это, поскольку ни одна из тех стран, что регулярно выражают свою горячую обеспокоенность судьбой этих деятелей в нехорошей Германии, почему-то до сих пор так и не удосужилась пригласить их на жительство к себе.

Es ist besser, zur rechten Zeit einen Schnitt zu tun, als zuzuwarten und die Krankheit sich erst richtig festsetzen zu lassen. Man darf aber dem Operateur, der den Schnitt tut, nicht in den Arm fallen oder ihn gar wegen Kцrperverletzung anklagen. Er schneidet nicht, um zu tцten, sondern um das Leben des Patienten zu retten.

Wiederum muss ich hier betonen, dass, je schwerer die Opfer sind, die das deutsche Volk zu bringen hat, umso dringender die Forderung erhoben werden muss, dass sie gerecht verteilt werden. Das will auch das Volk. Niemand strдubt sich heute gegen die Ьbernahme von auch schwersten Kriegslasten. Aber es muss natьrlich auf jeden aufreizend wirken, wenn gewisse Leute immer wieder versuchen, sich an den Lasten ьberhaupt vorbeizudrьcken. Die nationalsozialistische Staatsfьhrung hat die moralische, aber auch staatspolitische Pflicht, solchen Versuchen mannhaft, wenn nцtig mit drakonischen Strafen entgegenzutreten. Schonung wдre hier vollkommen fehl am Platze und wьrde allmдhlich zu einer Verwirrung der Gefьhle und Ansichten unseres Volkes fьhren, die eine schwere Gefдhrdung unserer цffentlichen Kriegsmoral nach sich ziehen mьsste. Wir sind somit auch gezwungen, eine Reihe von MaЯnahmen zu treffen, die zwar fьr die Kriegfьhrung an sich nicht von lebenswichtiger Bedeutung sind, die aber fьr die Aufrechterhaltung der Kriegsmoral in der Heimat und an der Front erforderlich erscheinen. Auch die Optik des Krieges, d.

Die Front hat angesichts der ьbermenschlichen Opfer, die sie tдglich zu bringen hat, ein elementares Anrecht darauf, dass auch nicht ein Einziger in der Heimat das Recht fьr sich in Anspruch nimmt, am Kriege und seinen Pflichten vorbeizuleben. Aber nicht nur die Front fordert das, sondern auch der weitaus ьberwiegende anstдndige Teil der Heimat. Stьrmischer Beifall. Die FleiЯigen besitzen einen Anspruch darauf, dass, wenn sie zehn und zwцlf und manchmal vierzehn Stunden tдglich arbeiten, sich direkt neben ihnen nicht die Faulenzer rдkeln und gar noch die anderen fьr dumm und nicht raffiniert genug halten. Die Heimat muss in ihrer Gesamtheit sauber und intakt bleiben. Nichts darf ihr kriegsgemдЯes Bild trьben. Wir haben beispielsweise die SchlieЯung der Bars und Nachtlokale angeordnet. Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass es heute noch Menschen gibt, die ihre Kriegspflichten voll erfьllen und gleichzeitig bis tief in die Nacht in Amьsierlokalen herumsitzen.

Ich muss daraus nur folgern, dass sie es mit ihren Kriegspflichten nicht allzu genau nehmen. Wir haben diese Amьsierlokale geschlossen, weil sie anfingen, uns lдstig zu fallen, und das Bild des Krieges trьbten. Wir verfolgen damit durchaus keine muckerischen Ziele. Nach dam Kriege wollen wir gern wieder nach dem Grundsatz verfahren: Leben und leben lassen. Wдhrend des Krieges aber gilt der Grundsatz: Kдmpfen und kдmpfen lassen! Es mag sein, dass der eine oder der andere auch wдhrend des Krieges noch in der Pflege des Magens eine Hauptaufgabe sieht. Auf ihn kцnnen wir dabei keine Rьcksicht nehmen. Wenn an der Front unsere kдmpfenden Truppen vom Grenadier bis zum Generalfeldmarschall aus der Feldkьche essen, so glaube ich, ist es nicht zu viel verlangt, wenn wir in der Heimat jeden zwingen, wenigstens auf die elementarsten Gebote des Gemeinschaftsdenkens Rьcksicht zu nehmen.

Feinschmecker wollen wir wieder nach dem Kriege werden. Heute haben wir Wichtigeres zu tun, als den Magen zu pflegen. Auch ungezдhlte Luxus- und Reprдsentationsgeschдfte sind mittlerweile zur Auflцsung gekommen. Sie waren fьr das kaufende Publikum vielfach ein stдndiger Stein des AnstoЯes. Zu kaufen gab es dort praktisch kaum noch etwas, hцchstens einmal, wenn man hier und da statt mit Geld, mit Butter oder mit Eiern bezahlte. Was haben Geschдfte fьr einen Zweck, die keine Waren mehr verkaufen und nur elektrisches Licht, Heizung und menschliche Arbeitskraft verbrauchen, die uns anderswo, vor allem in der Rьstungsproduktion, an allen Ecken und Enden fehlen. Man wende hier nicht ein, die Aufrechterhaltung eines holden Friedensscheines imponiere dem Auslande. Dem Ausland imponiert nur ein deutscher Sieg!

Stьrmische Zustimmung. Wenn wir gesiegt haben, wird jedermann unser Freund sein wollen. Wьrden wir aber einmal unterliegen, so kцnnten wir unsere Freunde an den Fingern einer Hand abzдhlen. Wir haben deshalb mit diesen falschen Illusionen, die das Kriegsbild verwischen, Schluss gemacht. Wir werden die Menschen, die dort untдtig in den leeren Geschдften herumstanden, einer nutzbringenderen Tдtigkeit in der цffentlichen Kriegswirtschaft zufьhren. Dieser Prozess ist eben im Gange und wird bis zum 15. Mдrz abgeschlossen sein. Er stellt natьrlich eine riesige Umorganisation unseres ganzen wirtschaftlichen Lebens dar.

Wir gehen dabei nicht planlos vor. Wir wollen auch niemanden zu Unrecht anklagen oder Tadel und Vorwurf nach allen Seiten verteilen. Wir tun lediglich das, was notwendig ist. Das aber tun wir schnell und grьndlich. Wir wollen lieber ein paar Jahre geflickte Kleider tragen, als einen Zustand heraufbeschwцren, in dem unser Volk ein paar Jahrhunderte in Lumpen herumlaufen mьsste. Was sollen heute noch Modesalons, die Licht, Heizung und menschliche Arbeitskraft verbrauchen. Sie werden nach dem Kriege, wenn wir wieder Zeit und Lust dazu haben, neu erstehen. Was sollen Frisiersalons, in denen ein Schцnheitskult gepflegt wird, der ungeheuer viel Zeit und Arbeitskraft beansprucht, der fьr den Frieden zwar sehr schцn und angenehm, fьr den Krieg aber ьberflьssig ist.

Unsere Frauen und Mдdchen werden einmal unseren siegreich heimkehrenden Soldaten auch ohne friedensmдЯige Aufmachung gefallen. In den цffentlichen Amtern wird in Zukunft etwas schneller und unbьrokratischer gearbeitet werden. Es ergibt durchaus kein gutes Bild, wenn dort nach achtstьndiger Arbeitszeit auf die Minute genau Schluss gemacht wird. Nicht das Volk ist fьr die Amter, sondern die Amter sind fьr das Volk da. Man arbeite also so lange, bis die Arbeit erledigt ist. Das ist das Gebot des Krieges. Wenn der Fьhrer das kann, so werden auch die Diener des Staates das kцnnen. Ist fьr eine lдngere Arbeitszelt nicht genьgend Arbeit da, so gibt man 10 oder 20 oder 30 Prozent der Mitarbeiter an die kriegswichtige Wirtschaft ab und stellt damit wieder eine entsprechende Anzahl Mдnner fьr die Front frei.

Das gilt fьr alle Dienststellen in der Heimat. Vielleicht wird gerade dadurch auch die Arbeit in den Amtern etwas schneller und etwas weniger schwerfдllig vor sich gehen. Wir mьssen im Kriege lernen, nicht nur grьndlich, sondern auch prompt zu arbeiten. Der Soldat an der Front hat auch nicht wochenlang Zeit, sich eine MaЯnahme zu ьberlegen, sie von Hand zu Hand weiterzugeben oder in den Akten verstauben zu lassen. Er muss sofort handeln, weil er sonst sein Leben verliert. Wir in der Heimat verlieren zwar durch schwerfдlliges Arbeiten nicht unser eigenes Leben, aber wir gefдhrden damit auf die Dauer das Leben unseres Volkes. Ьberhaupt muss jeder es sich zu einem selbstverstдndlichen Gebot der Kriegsmoral machen, auf die berechtigten Forderungen des arbeitenden und kдmpfenden Volkes die grцЯte Rьcksicht zu nehmen. Wir sind keine Spielverderber, aber wir lassen uns auch nicht das Spiel verderben.

Wenn beispielsweise gewisse Mдnner und Frauen sich wochenlang in den Kurorten herumrдkeln, sich dort Gerьchte zutratschen und schwer Kriegsversehrten und Arbeitern and Arbeiterinnen, die nach einjдhrigem, hartem Einsatz Anspruch auf Urlaub haben, den Platz wegnehmen, so ist das unertrдglich und deshalb abgestellt worden. Der Krieg ist nicht die richtige Zeit fьr einen gewissen Amьsierpцbel. Unsere Freude ist bis zu seinem Ende die Arbeit und der Kampf, darin finden wir unsere tiefe innere Genugtuung. Wer das nicht aus eigenem Pflichtgefьhl versteht, der muss zu diesem Pflichtgefьhl erzogen, wenn nцtig auch gezwungen werden. Hier hilft nur hartes Durchgreifen. Es macht z. Die Eisenbahn dient heute kriegswichtigen Transporten und kriegsnotwendigen Geschдftsreisen. Urlaub hat nur der zu beanspruchen, der sonst in seiner Arbeits- oder Kampfkraft schwer gefдhrdet wьrde.

Wenn also der erste Mann im Staate seine Pflicht so ernst und so verantwortungsvoll auffasst, dann muss das fьr jeden Bьrger und jede Bьrgerin des Staates eine stumme, aber doch unьberhцrbare Aufforderung sein, sich auch danach zu richten. Die Regierung tut andererseits alles, um dem arbeitenden Volke in dieser schweren Zeit die nцtigen Entspannungsmцglichkeiten zu erhalten. Theater, Kinos, Musiksдle bleiben voll im Betrieb. Der Rundfunk wird bestrebt sein, sein Programm noch zu erweitern und zu vervollkommnen. Wir haben durchaus nicht die Absicht, ьber unser Volk eine graue Winterstimmung heraufzubeschwцren. Was dem Volke dient, was seine Kampf- und Arbeitskraft erhдlt, stдhlt und vermehrt, das ist gut und kriegswichtig. Das Gegenteil ist abzuschaffen. Ich habe deshalb als Ausgleich gegen die eben geschilderten MaЯnahmen angeordnet, dass die geistigen und seelischen Erholungsstдtten des Volkes nicht vermindert, sondern vermehrt werden.

Soweit sie unseren Kriegsanstrengungen nicht schaden, sondern sie fцrdern, mьssen sie auch von Seiten der Staats- und Volksfьhrung eine entsprechende Fцrderung erfahren. Das gilt auch fьr den Sport. Der Sport ist heute keine Angelegenheit bevorzugter Kreise, sondern eine Angelegenheit des ganzen Volkes. K-Stellungen sind auf dem Sportgebiet gдnzlich sinnlos. Der Sport hat ja die Aufgabe, die Kцrperkraft zu stдhlen, doch wohl in der Hauptsache zu dem Zweck, sie wenigstens in der schlimmsten Notzeit des Volkes zum Einsatz zu bringen. Das alles will auch die Front. Das fordert mit stьrmischer Zustimmung das ganze deutsche Volk. Es will jetzt nichts mehr hцren von kriegsunwichtiger Betriebsamkeit und дhnlichen Wichtigtuereien, die nur Zeit und Aufwand erfordern.

Es will nichts mehr hцren von einem ьberspannten umstдndlichen Fragebogenunwesen fьr jeden Unsinn. Es will sich nicht in tausend Kleinigkeiten verzetteln, die fьr den Frieden vielleicht wichtig waren, fьr den Krieg aber keine Bedeutung besitzen. Es braucht auch nicht unter dauernder Erinnerung an das schwere Opfer unserer Soldaten in Stalingrad an seine Pflicht gemahnt zu werden. Es weiЯ, was es zu tun und was es zu lassen hat. So wie der Fьhrer dem ganzen Volke ein Beispiel gibt, so muss das ganze Volk in allen seinen Schichten sich dieses Beispiel auch zum Vorbild nehmen. Wenn er nur Arbeit und Sorgen kennt, so wollen wir ihm Arbeit und Sorgen nicht allein ьberlassen, sondern den Teil, den wir ihm abnehmen kцnnen, auch auf uns nehmen. Die Zeit, die wir heute durchleben, hat in ihrer ganzen Anlage fьr jeden echten Nationalsozialisten eine verblьffende Дhnlichkeit mit der Kampzeit. Da und immer haben wir so gehandelt.

Wir sind immer mit dem Volke durch dick und dьnn gegangen, und darum ist das Volk uns auch auf allen Wegen gefolgt. Wir haben immer mit dem Volke gemeinsam alle Lasten getragen, und deshalb schienen uns die Lasten nicht schwer, sondern leicht zu sein. Das Volk will gefьhrt werden. Noch niemals gab es in der Geschichte ein Beispiel dafьr, dass in einer kritischen Stunde des nationalen Lebens das Volk einer tapferen und entschlossenen Fьhrung die Gefolgschaft versagt hдtte. Ich mцchte in diesem Zusammenhang auch ьber einige praktische MaЯnahmen des totalen Krieges, die wir bereits getroffen haben, ein paar Worte verlieren. Diesen beiden Zielen mьssen alle anderen Bedьrfnisse untergeordnet werden, selbst auf Kosten unseres sozialen Lebensniveaus wдhrend des Krieges. Das soll nicht eine endgьltige Stabilisierung unseres Lebensstandards darstellen, sondern gilt nur als Mittel zur Erreichung des Zweckes, nдmlich des eines totalen Sieges. Es mьssen im Rahmen dieser Aktion hunderttausende von U.

K-Stellungen in der Heimat aufgehoben werden. Diese U. K-Stellungen waren bisher notwendig, weil wir nicht ausreichend Fach- und Schlьsselkrдfte zur Verfьgung hatten, die die durch Aufhebung der U. K-Stellungen leer werdenden Plдtze besetzen konnten. Es ist der Sinn der getroffenen und noch zu treffenden MaЯnahmen, die dafьr benцtigten Arbeitskrдfte zu mobilisieren. Darum geht unser Appell an die noch auЯerhalb der Kriegswirtschaft stehenden Mдnner und die bisher noch auЯerhalb des Arbeitsprozesses stehenden Frauen. Sie werden sich diesem Appell nicht versagen wollen und auch nicht versagen kцnnen. Die Arbeitspflicht fьr Frauen ist sehr weitschichtig gefasst worden Das heiЯt aber nicht, dass nur diejenigen, die im Gesetz genannt worden sind, arbeiten dьrfen.

Jeder ist uns willkommen, und je mehr sich fьr den groЯen Umschichtungsprozess in der inneren Wirtschaft zur Verfьgung stellen, umso mehr Soldaten kцnnen wir fьr die Front freimachen. Unsere Feinde behaupten, die deutschen Frauen seien nicht in der Lage, den Mann in der Kriegswirtschaft zu ersetzen. Das mag fьr bestimmte schwere kцrperliche Arbeiten unserer Kriegsfertigung zutreffen. Darьber hinaus aber bin ich der Ьberzeugung, dass die deutsche Frau fest entschlossen ist, den Platz, den der Mann, der an die Front geht, freimacht, in kьrzester Frist voll auszufьllen. Wir brauchen uns da gar nicht auf bolschewistische Beispiele zu berufen. Auch in der deutschen Kriegswirtschaft sind seit Jahren schon Millionen bester deutscher Frauen mit grцЯtem Erfolg tдtig, und sie warten mit Ungeduld darauf, dass ihre Reihen baldigst durch neuen Zuzug vermehrt und ergдnzt werden. Alle die, die sich fьr diese Arbeit zur Verfьgung stellen, erfьllen damit nur eine Dankespflicht der Front gegenьber. Hunderttausende sind schon gekommen, hunderttausende werden noch kommen.

In kьrzester Zeit hoffen wir damit Armeen von Arbeitskrдften freizumachen, die ihrerseits wieder Armeen von kдmpfenden Frontsoldaten freistellen werden. Ich mьsste mich sehr in den deutschen Frauen tдuschen, wenn ich annehmen sollte, dass sie den hiermit an sie ergehenden Appell ьberhцren wollten. Sie werden sich nicht in engherzigster Weise an das Gesetz anklammern oder gar noch versuchen, durch seine Maschen zu entschlьpfen. Im Ьbrigen wьrden die wenigen, die solche Absichten verfolgen, damit bei uns nicht landen. Arztliche Atteste werden statt der aufgerufenen Arbeitskraft nicht als vollwertig angenommen. Auch eine etwaige Alibi-Arbeit, die man sich beim Mann oder beim Sciiwager oder bei einem guten Bekannten verschafft, um sich unbeaufsichtigt weiter an der Arbeit vorbeidrьcken zu kцnnen, wird von uns mit entsprechenden GegenmaЯnahmen beantwortet werden. Die wenigen, die solche Plдne verfolgen, kцnnen sich damit in der цffentlichen Wertung nur selbst erledigen. Das Volk wird ihnen die grцЯte Verachtung zollen.

Ещё цитат Адольф Гитлер 1889-1945 был диктатором Германии с 1933 по 1945 годы и является одним из ключевых персонажей Второй мировой войны. Родившись в Австрии, Гитлер в молодости стремился стать художником, но в конечном итоге влился в политику, присоединившись к Немецкой Рабочей Партии в 1919 году. К 1921 году Гитлер стал лидером партии, переименовав ее в Национал-социалистическую немецкую рабочую партию, или НСДАП часто сокращенно называемую нацистской партией.

Похожие новости: