Heil Hitler! — «да здравствует Гитлер, слава Гитлеру» (обычно передаётся по-русски как Хайль Гитлер) или просто нем. Цитаты, фразы и афоризмы на немецком с переводом.”.
Цитаты гитлера на немецком с переводом. Немецкие крылатые выражения в русском языке
Цитаты Гитлера все скажут сами за себя. Heil Hitler! — «да здравствует Гитлер, слава Гитлеру» (обычно передаётся по-русски как Хайль Гитлер) или просто нем. text of Hitler s.
Обращение Адольфа Гитлера к германскому народу 22 июня 1941
Die große Zeit ist jetzt angebrochen. Deutschland ist nun erwacht. Die Macht haben wir nun in Deutschland gewonnen, nun gilt es das deutsche Volk zu gewinnen. Ich weiß, obwohl die hundert tausenden von euch die ihr jetzt zuhört in ganz Deutschland das in hundertausenden von euch in. Звук с фразой "Гитлер капут" на немецком языке (мужской голос). Reichstag Speech, May 21, 1935. "We recognize, with the understanding and the heartfelt friendship of true Nationalists, the Polish State as the home of a great, nationally-conscious people." "The German Reich and, in particular, the present German Government, have no other wish than to live on friendly.
Речь Гитлера после воссоединения Австрии с Германией
Без музыки жизнь была бы глупостью. Иметь фантазию — не значит что-то выдумывать; это значит, делать что-то новое из вещей. Религия — это благоговение — в первую очередь перед тайной, которую представляет собой человек. Пауль Томас Манн Wenn man jemandem alles verziehen hat, ist man mit ihm fertig. Если ты простил человеку все, значит с ним покончено. В тот момент, когда человек сомневается в смысле и ценности жизни, он болен. Зигмунд Фрейд Wir streben mehr danach, Schmerz zu vermeiden als Freude zu gewinnen. Мы больше стремимся к тому, чтобы избегать боли, нежели к тому, чтобы ощущать радость.
Мужчину легко узнать, женщина же не выдает своей тайны. Прекрасно то, что нравится, даже не вызывая интереса. Иммануил Кант Habe Mut, dich deines eigenen Verstandes zu bedienen. Имей мужество использовать свой собственный разум. Нужно думать, как единицы, и говорить, как большинство. Постоянны только изменения. Die Freunde nennen sich aufrichtig.
Die Feinde sind es. Друзьями себя называют. Врагами — являются. Прощать и забывать, значит выбрасывать ценный опыт в окно. Артур Шопенгауэр Wir denken selten an das, was wir haben, aber immer an das, was uns fehlt. Мы редко думаем о том, что имеем, но всегда о том, чего нам не хватает.
В 1933 году Гитлер был назначен канцлером Германии, и в течение нескольких лет установил авторитарное правление, известное как Третий Райх. Гитлер был известен своей агрессивной внешней политикой и убеждением в расовой превосходственности арийцев. Его антисемитские взгляды привели к Холокосту, геноциду евреев, во время которого было убито около шести миллионов евреев.
This problem is-as I have already stressed-perhaps the most painful of all problems for Germany. Nevertheless, I have never ceased to uphold the view that the necessity of a free access to the sea for the Polish State cannot be ignored, and that as a general principle, valid for this case, too, nations which Providence has destined or, if you like, condemned to live side by side would be well advised not to make life still harder for each other artificially and unnecessarily. The late Marshal Pilsudski, who was of the same opinion, was therefore prepared to go into the question of clarifying the atmosphere of German-Polish relations, and, finally, to conclude an agreement whereby Germany and Poland expressed their intention of renouncing war altogether as a means of settling the questions which concerned them both. This agreement contained one single exception which was in practice conceded to Poland. It was laid down that the pacts of mutual assistance already entered into by Poland-this applied to the pact with France- should not be affected by the agreement. But it was obvious that this could apply only to the pact of mutual assistance already concluded beforehand, and not to whatever new pacts might be concluded in the future. It is a fact that the German-Polish Agreement resulted in a remarkable lessening of the European tension. Nevertheless, there remained one open question between Germany and Poland, which sooner or later quite naturally had to be solved-the question of the German city of Danzig. Danzig is a German city and wishes to belong to Germany. On the other hand, this city has contracts with Poland, which were admittedly forced upon it by the dictators of the Peace of Versailles. But since, moreover, the League of Nations, formerly the greatest stirrer-up of trouble, is now represented by a High Commissioner-incidentally a man of extraordinary tact-the problem of Danzig must in any case come up for discussion, at the latest with the gradual extinction of this calamitous institution. I regarded the peaceful settlement of this problem as a further contribution to a final loosening of the European tension. For this loosening of the tension is assuredly not to be achieved through the agitations of insane warmongers, but through the removal of the real elements of danger. After the problem of Danzig had already been discussed several times some months ago, I made a concrete offer to the Polish Government. I now make this offer known to you, Gentlemen, and you yourselves will judge whether this offer did not represent the greatest imaginable concession in the interests of European peace. As I have already pointed out, I have always seen the necessity of an access to the sea for this country, and have consequently taken this necessity into consideration. I am no democratic statesman, but a National Socialist and a realist. I considered it, however, necessary to make it clear to the Government in Warsaw that just as they desire access to the sea, so Germany needs access to her province in the east.
Was Sie da sagen, ist ungeheuerlich. Sie ist ohne Ehre! У них нет чести! Es hat mir jeden erdenklichen Widerstand in den Weg gelegt! Ich war nie auf einer Akademie.
Текст и перевод песни Ernst Busch - Alle Waffen gegen Hitler
Нацистские высказывания. Афоризмы Адольфа Гитлера. Выступление Гитлера 1941. Речь Гитлера на русском. Слова Гитлера о русских. Высказывания Гитлера о славянах.
Цитаты Гитлера о евреях. Цитаты Сталина. Высказывания великих людей о Сталине. Высказывания о Сталине. Великие люди о Сталине цитаты.
Геббельс про ложь и правду. Йозеф Геббельс пропаганда. Йозеф Геббельс цитаты. Гитлер был нацистом. Фашист и Патриот.
Гитлер о социализме цитата. Гитлер Украина. Русские должны умереть, чтобы жили мы немцы. Мы обязаны истреблять население. Гитлер заявил мы обязаны истребить населения.
Мы обязаны истребить население низшей расы. Планы Гитлера. Только водка и табак. Никакой гигиены только водка и табак Гитлер. Майн кампф Адольф Гитлер цитаты.
Mein Kampf цитаты. Mein Kampf мемы. Гитлер о славянах цитаты. Высказывания фашистов о русских. Речи Адольфа Гитлера на немецком языке.
Речи Адольфа Гитлера с переводом. Германские фразы Гитлера. Геббельс о русских высказывание. Геббельс цитаты. Геббельс цитаты о пропаганде.
Геббельс о Гитлере цитаты. Высказывания о любви Адольфа Гитлера. Смешные фразы Гитлера. Цитаты Гитлера и Путина. Путин о Гитлере цитаты.
Оставьте свое мнение в комментарии под роликом. Подписывайтесь на канал, и не забудьте поставить колокольчик. Впереди вас ждет много чего интересного и полезного. Начните свою жизнь - по новому и с чистого листа.
Am 30. Januar 1933 ernannte Hindenburg Hitler zum Reichskanzler. Adolf Hitler wird Reichskanzler am 30. WDR 5. Er heiratete sie erst wenige Tage vor ihrem gemeinsamen Suizid. Als in den letzten Kriegstagen die deutsche Niederlage absehbar war, erschoss sich Adolf Hitler am 30. April 1945. Letzte Aktualisierung: 07.
Nevertheless, I have never ceased to uphold the view that the necessity of a free access to the sea for the Polish State cannot be ignored, and that as a general principle, valid for this case, too, nations which Providence has destined or, if you like, condemned to live side by side would be well advised not to make life still harder for each other artificially and unnecessarily. The late Marshal Pilsudski, who was of the same opinion, was therefore prepared to go into the question of clarifying the atmosphere of German-Polish relations, and, finally, to conclude an agreement whereby Germany and Poland expressed their intention of renouncing war altogether as a means of settling the questions which concerned them both. This agreement contained one single exception which was in practice conceded to Poland. It was laid down that the pacts of mutual assistance already entered into by Poland-this applied to the pact with France- should not be affected by the agreement. But it was obvious that this could apply only to the pact of mutual assistance already concluded beforehand, and not to whatever new pacts might be concluded in the future. It is a fact that the German-Polish Agreement resulted in a remarkable lessening of the European tension. Nevertheless, there remained one open question between Germany and Poland, which sooner or later quite naturally had to be solved-the question of the German city of Danzig. Danzig is a German city and wishes to belong to Germany. On the other hand, this city has contracts with Poland, which were admittedly forced upon it by the dictators of the Peace of Versailles. But since, moreover, the League of Nations, formerly the greatest stirrer-up of trouble, is now represented by a High Commissioner-incidentally a man of extraordinary tact-the problem of Danzig must in any case come up for discussion, at the latest with the gradual extinction of this calamitous institution. I regarded the peaceful settlement of this problem as a further contribution to a final loosening of the European tension. For this loosening of the tension is assuredly not to be achieved through the agitations of insane warmongers, but through the removal of the real elements of danger. After the problem of Danzig had already been discussed several times some months ago, I made a concrete offer to the Polish Government. I now make this offer known to you, Gentlemen, and you yourselves will judge whether this offer did not represent the greatest imaginable concession in the interests of European peace. As I have already pointed out, I have always seen the necessity of an access to the sea for this country, and have consequently taken this necessity into consideration. I am no democratic statesman, but a National Socialist and a realist. I considered it, however, necessary to make it clear to the Government in Warsaw that just as they desire access to the sea, so Germany needs access to her province in the east. Now these are all difficult problems.
Цитаты Адольфа Гитлера
Пользователь Микола Довгенький задал вопрос в категории Лингвистика и получил на него 2 ответа. Полный текст обращения Гитлера от 22 июня 1941 года, в котором он разъяснял для немецкого народа причины нападения Германии на СССР: Немецкий народ! Цитаты Гитлера все скажут сами за себя. Главная» Новости» Слова гитлера на немецком.
Цитаты адольфа гитлера на немецком с переводом
Речь Гитлера текст. Выступление Гитлера с переводом. Высказывания Гитлера о русских. Цитаты Гитлера на русском. Листовки Гитлера. Текст Гитлера на немецком. Гитлеровские речи на немецком. Гитлер начал вторую мировую войну. Высказывания Гитлера о войне. Цитата Гитлера про войну.
Высказывания немцев о украинцах. Гитлер про украинцев и русских. Нацистские высказывания. Афоризмы Адольфа Гитлера. Выступление Гитлера 1941. Речь Гитлера на русском. Слова Гитлера о русских. Высказывания Гитлера о славянах. Цитаты Гитлера о евреях.
Цитаты Сталина. Высказывания великих людей о Сталине. Высказывания о Сталине. Великие люди о Сталине цитаты. Геббельс про ложь и правду. Йозеф Геббельс пропаганда. Йозеф Геббельс цитаты. Гитлер был нацистом. Фашист и Патриот.
Гитлер о социализме цитата. Гитлер Украина. Русские должны умереть, чтобы жили мы немцы. Мы обязаны истреблять население. Гитлер заявил мы обязаны истребить населения. Мы обязаны истребить население низшей расы. Планы Гитлера. Только водка и табак. Никакой гигиены только водка и табак Гитлер.
Майн кампф Адольф Гитлер цитаты. Mein Kampf цитаты. Mein Kampf мемы. Гитлер о славянах цитаты.
Люди бывают склонны приносить жертвы лишь тогда, когда они могутдействительно ждать успеха, а не тогда, когда бесцельность этих жертвочевидна. Светские школы недопустимы, так как в таких школах нет религиозногообучения, а общее нравственное обучение без религиозного основаниязиждится на пустоте; следовательно, воспитание личности и религиядолжны основываться на Вере. Нам нужные верующие люди. Сила христианства состояла например вовсе не в попытках соглашения ипримирения, скажем, с близкими ему философскими мнениями древних.
Она состояла в непреклонной фанатической защите только одного своегособственного учения. Каждый художник, который изображает небо зелёным, а траву голубой, должен быть подвергнут стерилизации. Чтобы излечить какую-либо болезнь, надо сначала понять, каковы её возбудители. То же самое относится и к лечению политических болезней. Никогда нельзя встретить лисы, которая обнаруживала бы какие-нибудь гуманные намерения по отношению к гусю, как никогда мы не встретим кошки, склонной к дружбе с мышами. Пока я руковожу партией, она не будет дискуссионным клубом для безродных литераторов и салонных большевиков. В последнем счете всегда побеждает только инстинкт самосохранения. Поддавлением этого инстинкта вся так называемая человечность, являющаясятолько выражением чего-то среднего между глупостью, трусостью исамомнением, тает как снег на весеннем солнце.
Высшей целью человечества является ни в коем случае не сохранениеданной государственной формы или тем более данного правительства, асохранение народного начала. Грехи против крови и расы являються самыми страшными грехами на этом свете. Нация, которая предаётся этим грехам, обречена. Будь то Ветхий Завет или Новый, нет никакой разницы: всё то же старое еврейское надувательство. Нельзя быть одновременно немцем и христианином. Надо выбрать одно. Нам нужны свободные люди, которые чувствуют и знают, что Бог находиться в них самих. Я не измеряю её по нашим новым фабрикам и новым мостам, которые мы строим, а также по новым дивизиям, которые мы можем мобилизовать.
Напротив, в центре суждения об успешности этой работы стоит немецкий ребёнок, стоит немецкая молодёж. Только тогда, когда созданы условия для их роста и развития, я могу быть твёрдо уверен в том, что иой народ не исчезнет, а, значит, и наша работа не окажется напрасной. Мы не желаем удобной жизни, мы стремимся постичь тайну жизни с её сотнями тысяч и миллионами проявлений. Мы вопрошаем звёзды, чья воля заставляет их чередовать свои восходы и закаты. И мы вопрошаем воды, в какую даль и глубину устремляют они свой бег. Мы достаточно сильны сердцем, чтобы не убегать от вечных вопросов «откуда» и «куда» и мы не можем согласится с тем, что научное познание законов природы может дать законченное объяснение этих причин. Наше благоговение перед глубиной мира не исчезает перед лицом необходимости вести борьбу за существование. Но но мы не желаем превратиться в бездеятельных фантазёров или людей, которые, снедаемые постоянными сомнениями, не способны вести активную жизнь.
Скорее мы стремимся принять жизнь такой как она есть в повседневности, со всеми ее горестями, которые так же, как и радость, ведут нас к постижению смысла бытия. Бог, в которого мы верим соответствует нашим сердцам. Он пребывает в наших сердцах тогда, когда они открыты и находятся в гармонии с миром. Бог живёт в нас, потому что мы постоянно ищем свидетельства Его Силы в мире и стремимся приобщиться к ним. Разве это не требует гордости и благородного мужества, чтобы обрести Бога в себе? Разве это не требует благородной стойкости и способности — утвердить себя как человека перед Всемогущим Богом? Мы возносим мольбу к Богу и Его мировому творениию с тем большей верой, чем более гордыми и уверенными мы ощущаем себя. Смеющийся глаз, легкий шаг, дух, который воистину способен радоваться и возвышаться, искренняя юность, неподдельная стойкость, любовь, дружба — вот заповеди, данные нам Богом.
И вновь мы соглашаемся с мыслями автора, которого мы упоминали в начале и который завершает утверждение своего поэтического кредо словами, представляющими символ Веры для всех нас: «Сила Божия творится руками человеческими». Всемогущий есть наш Судья. Наша задача — исполнить наш долг так, чтобы мы смогли предстать перед Ним как Творцом всего мироздания в соответствии с данным Им законом, законом борьбы за существование. Ванюшкиной Из сборника «SS Ideology, translated from original SS publication» Когда людские сердца разбиваются от горя, а души разрываются от отчаяния, тогда из мглы прошедших времен на нас смотрят наши великие предки, не раз преодолевавшие нужду и заботу, позор и муку, духовную несвободу и физическое принуждение.
Вот несколько примеров фраз, которые отражают идеологию Гитлера: Смотрите также: Культура и традиции Корейски 1. Он пропагандировал идею о чистоте немецкой расы и необходимости поддержания ее «чистоты» путем избегания смешения с другими расами. Он считал, что только путем единства нации можно достичь процветания и мощи Германии. Эти фразы отражают главные принципы идеологии Гитлера и его стремление к поддержанию превосходства немецкой расы и единства нации.
Именно с помощью подобных высказываний он убеждал и вдохновлял миллионы немцев на покорение мира и осуществление своей визии «Тысячелетней империи». Какие фразы использовал Гитлер в своих речах и выступлениях Великий диктатор Адольф Гитлер был мастером ораторского искусства. Его речи и выступления оказывали огромное влияние на миллионы людей, и считается, что именно его слова способствовали набору поддержки и веры в его политику и идеологию. Вот некоторые известные фразы, которые Гитлер использовал в своих речах: «Дайте мне народ, и я построю государство» Эта фраза отражает идею Гитлера о необходимости авторитарного правления и отказе от демократии в пользу сильной власти, которая, по его мнению, способна создать успешное и процветающее государство.
Scheinheilig erklдren sie, daraus mьsse man also folgern, dass sich unter diesen Umstдnden der Kampf gegen den Bolschewismus ьberhaupt erьbrige. Es geht hier nicht um die Methode, mit der man den Bolschewismus zu Boden schlдgt sondern um das Ziel, nдmlich um die Beseitigung der Gefahr. Minutenlanger Beifall. Die Frage ist also nicht die, ob die Methoden, die wir anwenden, gut oder schlecht sind, sondern ob sie zum Erfolge fьhren.
Jedenfalls sind wir als nationalsozialistische Volksfьhrung jetzt zu allem entschlossen. Wir packen zu, ohne Rьcksicht auf die Einsprьche des einen oder des anderen. Wir wollen nicht mehr im Interesse der Aufrechterhaltung eines hohen, manchmal fast friedensmдЯigen inneren Lebensstandards fьr eine bestimmte Volksschicht das deutsche Kriegspotential schwдchen und damit unsere Kriegfьhrung gefдhrden. Im Gegenteil, wir verzichten freiwillig auf einen bedeutenden Teil dieses Lebensstandards, um das Kriegspotential so schnell und so grьndlich wie mцglich zu erhцhen. Diese Aktion stellt keinen Selbstzweck, sondern nur ein Mittel zum Zweck dar. Umso hцher wird nach dem Siege wieder der soziale Lebensstandard unseres Volkes steigen. Wir brauchen die bolschewistischen Methoden schon deshalb nicht nachzuahmen, weil wir ьber das bessere Menschen- und Fьhrungsmaterial verfьgen und damit einen groЯen Vorsprung besitzen. Aber wir mьssen, wie die Entwicklung zeigt, viel mehr tun, als wir bisher getan haben, um dem Krieg im Osten eine entscheidende Wendung zum Besseren zu geben.
Im Ьbrigen herrscht darьber, wie mir aus ungezдhlten Briefen aus der Heimat und Zustimmungskundgebungen von der Front mitgeteilt wird, im ganzen deutschen Volke ьberhaupt nur eine Meinung. Jedermann weiЯ, dass dieser Krieg, wenn wir ihr verlцren, uns aber vernichten wьrde. Und darum ist das Volk mit seiner Fьhrung entschlossen, nunmehr zur radikalsten Selbsthilfe zu greifen. Die breiten arbeitenden Massen unseres Volkes machen der Regierung nicht zum Vorwurf, dass sie zu rьcksichtslos, sondern hцchstens, dass sie zu rьcksichtsvoll vorgeht. Man frage landauf, landab das deutsche Volk; nun wird ьberall nur die eine Antwort erhalten: Das Radikalste ist heute eben radikal, und das Totalste ist heute eben total genug, um den Sieg zu erringen. Darum ist die totale Kriegfьhrung eine Sache des ganzen deutschen Volkes. Niemand kann sich auch nur mit einem Schein von Berechtigung an ihren Forderungen vorbeidrьcken. Als ich in meiner Rede vom 30.
Januar von dieser Stelle aus den totalen Krieg proklamierte, schwollen mir aus den um reich versammelten Menschenmassen Orkane der Zustimmung zu. Ich kann also feststellen, dass die Fьhrung sich in ihren MaЯnahmen in vollkommener Ьbereinstimmung mit dem ganzen deutschen Volk in der Heimat und an der Front befindet. Das Volk will alle, auch die schwersten Belastungen auf sich nehmen und ist bereit, jedes Opfer zu bringen, wenn damit dem groЯen Ziel des Sieges gedient wird. Lebhafte Zurufe. Die Voraussetzung dazu aber ist selbstverstдndlich die, dass die Lasten gerecht verteilt werden. Lauteste Zustimmung. Es darf nicht geduldet werden, dass der weitaus grцЯte Teil des Volkes die ganze Bьrde des Krieges trдgt, und ein kleiner passiver Teil sich an den Lasten und an der Verantwortung des Krieges vorbeizudrьcken versucht. Die MaЯnahmen, die wir getroffen haben und noch treffen mьssen, werden deshalb vom Geiste einer nationalsozialistischen Gerechtigkeit erfьllt sein.
Wir nehmen keine Rьcksicht auf Stand und Beruf. Arm und Reich und Hoch und Niedrig mьssen in gleicher Weise beansprucht werden. Jedermann wird in dieser ernstesten Phase unseres Schicksalskampfes zur Erfьllung seiner Pflicht der Nation gegenьber angehalten, wenn nцtig, gezwungen werden. Wir wissen uns auch dabei in voller Ьbereinstimmung mit dem nationalen Willen unseres Volkes. Wir wollen lieber zuviel als zu wenig Kraft zur Erringung des Sieges anwenden. Noch niemals ist ein Krieg in der Geschichte der Vцlker verloren gegangen, weil die Fьhrung zuviel Soldaten und Waffen hatte. Sehr viele aber gingen verloren, weil das Umgekehrte der Fall war. Es ist also an der Zeit, den Sдumigen Beine zu machen.
Stьrmische Bravorufe. Sie mьssen aus ihrer bequemen Ruhe aufgerьttelt werden. Wir kцnnen nicht warten, bis sie von selbst zur Besinnung kommen und es dann vielleicht zu spдt ist. Es muss wie ein Alarmruf durch das ganze Volk gehen. Eine Arbeit von Millionen Hдnden hat einzusetzen, und zwar landauf, landab. Die MaЯnahmen, die wir bereits getroffen haben und noch treffen mьssen und die ich im weiteren Teil meiner Ausfьhrungen des nдheren erlдutern werde, sind einschneidend fьr das gesamte private und цffentliche Leben. Die Opfer, die der einzelne Bьrger dabei zu bringen hat, sind manchmal schwer; aber sie bedeuten nur wenig den Opfern gegenьber, die er bringen mьsste, wenn er sich zu diesen Opfern weigerte und damit das grцЯte nationale Unglьck ьber unser Volk heraufbeschwцrte. Es ist besser, zur rechten Zeit einen Schnitt zu tun, als zuzuwarten und die Krankheit sich erst richtig festsetzen zu lassen.
Man darf aber dem Operateur, der den Schnitt tut, nicht in den Arm fallen oder ihn gar wegen Kцrperverletzung anklagen. Er schneidet nicht, um zu tцten, sondern um das Leben des Patienten zu retten. Wiederum muss ich hier betonen, dass, je schwerer die Opfer sind, die das deutsche Volk zu bringen hat, umso dringender die Forderung erhoben werden muss, dass sie gerecht verteilt werden. Das will auch das Volk. Niemand strдubt sich heute gegen die Ьbernahme von auch schwersten Kriegslasten. Aber es muss natьrlich auf jeden aufreizend wirken, wenn gewisse Leute immer wieder versuchen, sich an den Lasten ьberhaupt vorbeizudrьcken. Die nationalsozialistische Staatsfьhrung hat die moralische, aber auch staatspolitische Pflicht, solchen Versuchen mannhaft, wenn nцtig mit drakonischen Strafen entgegenzutreten. Schonung wдre hier vollkommen fehl am Platze und wьrde allmдhlich zu einer Verwirrung der Gefьhle und Ansichten unseres Volkes fьhren, die eine schwere Gefдhrdung unserer цffentlichen Kriegsmoral nach sich ziehen mьsste.
Wir sind somit auch gezwungen, eine Reihe von MaЯnahmen zu treffen, die zwar fьr die Kriegfьhrung an sich nicht von lebenswichtiger Bedeutung sind, die aber fьr die Aufrechterhaltung der Kriegsmoral in der Heimat und an der Front erforderlich erscheinen. Auch die Optik des Krieges, d. Die Front hat angesichts der ьbermenschlichen Opfer, die sie tдglich zu bringen hat, ein elementares Anrecht darauf, dass auch nicht ein Einziger in der Heimat das Recht fьr sich in Anspruch nimmt, am Kriege und seinen Pflichten vorbeizuleben. Aber nicht nur die Front fordert das, sondern auch der weitaus ьberwiegende anstдndige Teil der Heimat. Stьrmischer Beifall. Die FleiЯigen besitzen einen Anspruch darauf, dass, wenn sie zehn und zwцlf und manchmal vierzehn Stunden tдglich arbeiten, sich direkt neben ihnen nicht die Faulenzer rдkeln und gar noch die anderen fьr dumm und nicht raffiniert genug halten. Die Heimat muss in ihrer Gesamtheit sauber und intakt bleiben. Nichts darf ihr kriegsgemдЯes Bild trьben.
Wir haben beispielsweise die SchlieЯung der Bars und Nachtlokale angeordnet. Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass es heute noch Menschen gibt, die ihre Kriegspflichten voll erfьllen und gleichzeitig bis tief in die Nacht in Amьsierlokalen herumsitzen. Ich muss daraus nur folgern, dass sie es mit ihren Kriegspflichten nicht allzu genau nehmen. Wir haben diese Amьsierlokale geschlossen, weil sie anfingen, uns lдstig zu fallen, und das Bild des Krieges trьbten. Wir verfolgen damit durchaus keine muckerischen Ziele. Nach dam Kriege wollen wir gern wieder nach dem Grundsatz verfahren: Leben und leben lassen. Wдhrend des Krieges aber gilt der Grundsatz: Kдmpfen und kдmpfen lassen! Es mag sein, dass der eine oder der andere auch wдhrend des Krieges noch in der Pflege des Magens eine Hauptaufgabe sieht.
Auf ihn kцnnen wir dabei keine Rьcksicht nehmen. Wenn an der Front unsere kдmpfenden Truppen vom Grenadier bis zum Generalfeldmarschall aus der Feldkьche essen, so glaube ich, ist es nicht zu viel verlangt, wenn wir in der Heimat jeden zwingen, wenigstens auf die elementarsten Gebote des Gemeinschaftsdenkens Rьcksicht zu nehmen. Feinschmecker wollen wir wieder nach dem Kriege werden. Heute haben wir Wichtigeres zu tun, als den Magen zu pflegen. Auch ungezдhlte Luxus- und Reprдsentationsgeschдfte sind mittlerweile zur Auflцsung gekommen. Sie waren fьr das kaufende Publikum vielfach ein stдndiger Stein des AnstoЯes. Zu kaufen gab es dort praktisch kaum noch etwas, hцchstens einmal, wenn man hier und da statt mit Geld, mit Butter oder mit Eiern bezahlte. Was haben Geschдfte fьr einen Zweck, die keine Waren mehr verkaufen und nur elektrisches Licht, Heizung und menschliche Arbeitskraft verbrauchen, die uns anderswo, vor allem in der Rьstungsproduktion, an allen Ecken und Enden fehlen.
Man wende hier nicht ein, die Aufrechterhaltung eines holden Friedensscheines imponiere dem Auslande. Dem Ausland imponiert nur ein deutscher Sieg! Stьrmische Zustimmung. Wenn wir gesiegt haben, wird jedermann unser Freund sein wollen. Wьrden wir aber einmal unterliegen, so kцnnten wir unsere Freunde an den Fingern einer Hand abzдhlen. Wir haben deshalb mit diesen falschen Illusionen, die das Kriegsbild verwischen, Schluss gemacht. Wir werden die Menschen, die dort untдtig in den leeren Geschдften herumstanden, einer nutzbringenderen Tдtigkeit in der цffentlichen Kriegswirtschaft zufьhren. Dieser Prozess ist eben im Gange und wird bis zum 15.
Mдrz abgeschlossen sein. Er stellt natьrlich eine riesige Umorganisation unseres ganzen wirtschaftlichen Lebens dar. Wir gehen dabei nicht planlos vor. Wir wollen auch niemanden zu Unrecht anklagen oder Tadel und Vorwurf nach allen Seiten verteilen. Wir tun lediglich das, was notwendig ist. Das aber tun wir schnell und grьndlich. Wir wollen lieber ein paar Jahre geflickte Kleider tragen, als einen Zustand heraufbeschwцren, in dem unser Volk ein paar Jahrhunderte in Lumpen herumlaufen mьsste. Was sollen heute noch Modesalons, die Licht, Heizung und menschliche Arbeitskraft verbrauchen.
Sie werden nach dem Kriege, wenn wir wieder Zeit und Lust dazu haben, neu erstehen. Was sollen Frisiersalons, in denen ein Schцnheitskult gepflegt wird, der ungeheuer viel Zeit und Arbeitskraft beansprucht, der fьr den Frieden zwar sehr schцn und angenehm, fьr den Krieg aber ьberflьssig ist. Unsere Frauen und Mдdchen werden einmal unseren siegreich heimkehrenden Soldaten auch ohne friedensmдЯige Aufmachung gefallen. In den цffentlichen Amtern wird in Zukunft etwas schneller und unbьrokratischer gearbeitet werden. Es ergibt durchaus kein gutes Bild, wenn dort nach achtstьndiger Arbeitszeit auf die Minute genau Schluss gemacht wird. Nicht das Volk ist fьr die Amter, sondern die Amter sind fьr das Volk da. Man arbeite also so lange, bis die Arbeit erledigt ist. Das ist das Gebot des Krieges.
Wenn der Fьhrer das kann, so werden auch die Diener des Staates das kцnnen. Ist fьr eine lдngere Arbeitszelt nicht genьgend Arbeit da, so gibt man 10 oder 20 oder 30 Prozent der Mitarbeiter an die kriegswichtige Wirtschaft ab und stellt damit wieder eine entsprechende Anzahl Mдnner fьr die Front frei. Das gilt fьr alle Dienststellen in der Heimat. Vielleicht wird gerade dadurch auch die Arbeit in den Amtern etwas schneller und etwas weniger schwerfдllig vor sich gehen. Wir mьssen im Kriege lernen, nicht nur grьndlich, sondern auch prompt zu arbeiten. Der Soldat an der Front hat auch nicht wochenlang Zeit, sich eine MaЯnahme zu ьberlegen, sie von Hand zu Hand weiterzugeben oder in den Akten verstauben zu lassen. Er muss sofort handeln, weil er sonst sein Leben verliert. Wir in der Heimat verlieren zwar durch schwerfдlliges Arbeiten nicht unser eigenes Leben, aber wir gefдhrden damit auf die Dauer das Leben unseres Volkes.
Ьberhaupt muss jeder es sich zu einem selbstverstдndlichen Gebot der Kriegsmoral machen, auf die berechtigten Forderungen des arbeitenden und kдmpfenden Volkes die grцЯte Rьcksicht zu nehmen. Wir sind keine Spielverderber, aber wir lassen uns auch nicht das Spiel verderben. Wenn beispielsweise gewisse Mдnner und Frauen sich wochenlang in den Kurorten herumrдkeln, sich dort Gerьchte zutratschen und schwer Kriegsversehrten und Arbeitern and Arbeiterinnen, die nach einjдhrigem, hartem Einsatz Anspruch auf Urlaub haben, den Platz wegnehmen, so ist das unertrдglich und deshalb abgestellt worden. Der Krieg ist nicht die richtige Zeit fьr einen gewissen Amьsierpцbel. Unsere Freude ist bis zu seinem Ende die Arbeit und der Kampf, darin finden wir unsere tiefe innere Genugtuung. Wer das nicht aus eigenem Pflichtgefьhl versteht, der muss zu diesem Pflichtgefьhl erzogen, wenn nцtig auch gezwungen werden. Hier hilft nur hartes Durchgreifen. Es macht z.
Die Eisenbahn dient heute kriegswichtigen Transporten und kriegsnotwendigen Geschдftsreisen. Urlaub hat nur der zu beanspruchen, der sonst in seiner Arbeits- oder Kampfkraft schwer gefдhrdet wьrde. Wenn also der erste Mann im Staate seine Pflicht so ernst und so verantwortungsvoll auffasst, dann muss das fьr jeden Bьrger und jede Bьrgerin des Staates eine stumme, aber doch unьberhцrbare Aufforderung sein, sich auch danach zu richten. Die Regierung tut andererseits alles, um dem arbeitenden Volke in dieser schweren Zeit die nцtigen Entspannungsmцglichkeiten zu erhalten. Theater, Kinos, Musiksдle bleiben voll im Betrieb. Der Rundfunk wird bestrebt sein, sein Programm noch zu erweitern und zu vervollkommnen. Wir haben durchaus nicht die Absicht, ьber unser Volk eine graue Winterstimmung heraufzubeschwцren. Was dem Volke dient, was seine Kampf- und Arbeitskraft erhдlt, stдhlt und vermehrt, das ist gut und kriegswichtig.
Das Gegenteil ist abzuschaffen. Ich habe deshalb als Ausgleich gegen die eben geschilderten MaЯnahmen angeordnet, dass die geistigen und seelischen Erholungsstдtten des Volkes nicht vermindert, sondern vermehrt werden. Soweit sie unseren Kriegsanstrengungen nicht schaden, sondern sie fцrdern, mьssen sie auch von Seiten der Staats- und Volksfьhrung eine entsprechende Fцrderung erfahren. Das gilt auch fьr den Sport. Der Sport ist heute keine Angelegenheit bevorzugter Kreise, sondern eine Angelegenheit des ganzen Volkes. K-Stellungen sind auf dem Sportgebiet gдnzlich sinnlos. Der Sport hat ja die Aufgabe, die Kцrperkraft zu stдhlen, doch wohl in der Hauptsache zu dem Zweck, sie wenigstens in der schlimmsten Notzeit des Volkes zum Einsatz zu bringen.
Цитата Гитлера из статьи Путина, по всей видимости, фейковая
September 16, 1919. On this date, Adolf Hitler issued his first written comment on the so-called Jewish Question. Adolf Hitler beeinflusste die Geschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts auf schreckliche Weise. Doch wie wurde er zum Diktator, der die Welt mit einem verheerenden Krieg und dem Holocaust in eine Katastrophe stürzte? Немецкий является языком оригинала многих из нижеприведенных цитат, потому что среди немцев было много великих людей. Адольф Гитлер (1889-1945) был диктатором Германии с 1933 по 1945 годы и является одним из ключевых персонажей Второй мировой войны.
Знаменитые слова гитлера на немецком
I, therefore, decided last night and informed the British Government that in these circumstances I can no longer find any willingness on the part of the Czechoslovak Government to conduct serious negotiations with us. These proposals for mediation have failed because in the meanwhile there, first of all, came as an answer the sudden Czechoslovak general mobilization, followed by more Czech atrocities. These were again repeated last night. Recently there have been as many as twenty-one incidents in which Czech military formations have killed innocent Sudeten Germans without provocations.
Last night there were fourteen, of which one was quite serious. I have, therefore, resolved to speak to Czechoslovakia in the same language that Czechoslovakia for months past has used toward us and the Sudeten German minority. This attitude on the part of the Reich will not change.
The other European States understand in part our attitude. I should like here above all to thank Italy as well as Hungary, which throughout have supported us, but you will understand that for the carrying on of this struggle we do not intend to appeal to foreign help. We will carry out this task ourselves.
The neutral States have assured us of their neutrality, just as we had already guaranteed it to them. When statesmen in the West declare that this affects their interests, I can only regret such a declaration. It cannot for a moment make me hesitate to fulfil my duty.
What more is wanted? I have solemnly assured them, and I repeat it, that we ask nothing of those Western States and never will ask anything. I have declared that the frontier between France and Germany is a final one.
I have repeatedly offered friendship and, if necessary, the closest co-operation to Britain, but this cannot be offered from one side only. It must find response on the other side. Germany has no interests in the West, and our western wall is for all time the frontier of the Reich on the west.
Moreover, we have no aims of any kind there for the future. With this assurance we are in solemn earnest, and as long as others do not violate their neutrality we will likewise take every care to respect it. I am determined to solve 1 the Sudeten question and 2 to see to it that a change is made in the relationship between Germany and Czechoslovakia that shall ensure a peaceful co-existence.
In this I am resolved to continue to fight until either the present Czechoslovak government is willing to continue to bring about this change or until another Czechoslovak Government is ready to do so. I am resolved to remove from the German frontiers the element of uncertainty, the everlasting atmosphere of conditions resembling civil war. I will see to it that in the East there is, on the frontier, a peace precisely similar to that on our other frontiers.
In this I will take the necessary measures to se that they do not contradict the proposals I have already made known in the Reichstag itself to the rest of the world, that is to say, I will not war against women and children. I have ordered my air force to restrict itself to attacks on military objectives. If, however, the enemy thinks he can form that draw carte blanche on his side to fight by the other methods he will receive an answer that will deprive him of hearing and sight.
This night for the first time Czech regular soldiers fired on our territory. Three German soldiers and five Sudeten Germans were killed by Czech soldiers at Egerteich without provocation. Since 6.
Alle kreativen Ideen einer Person erscheinen im Allgemeinen bereits in seiner Jugend. Das Volk und das Vaterland sind das einzige. Bolschewismus, das uneheliche Kind des Christentums. Seien Sie vorsichtig mit Menschen, sie sind unberechenbar. Die Grenzen aller Staaten sind nur das Ergebnis eines politischen Kampfes. Антон Усов.
This is the clearest refutation of the assertion that Germany is pursuing a policy of economic isolation. Credit manipulation may perhaps have a temporary effect, but in the long run economic international relations will be decisively influenced by the volume of mutual exchange of goods. And here the state of affairs at the present moment is not such that the outside world would be able to place huge orders with us or offer prospects of an increase in the exchange of goods even if we were to fulfil the most extraordinary conditions that they might lay down. Matters should not be made more complicated than they already are. But Germany cannot be blamed for these two things, and especially not National Socialist Germany. When we assumed power the world economic crisis was worse than it is today.
I fear however that I must interpret Mr. Therefore I wish it to be clearly understood that our decision to carry out this plan is unalterable. The reasons which led to that decision were inexorable. And since then I have not been able to discover anything whatsoever that might induce us to discontinue the four years plan. I shall take only one practical example: In carrying out the four years plan our synthetic production of rubber and petrol will necessitate an annual increase in our consumption of coal by a margin of something between 20 and 30 million tons. This means that an extra quota of thousands of coal miners are assured of employment for the rest of their active lives. I must really take the liberty of asking this question: Supposing we abondon [sic] the German four years plan, then what statesman can guarantee me some economic equivalent or other, outside of the Reich, for these thirty million tons of coal?
I want bread and work for my people. And certainly I do not wish to have it through the operation of credit guarantees, but through solid and permanent lab our, the products of which I can either exchange for foreign goods or for domestic goods in our internal commercial circulation. If by some manipulation or other Germany were to throw these 20 or 30 million tons of coal annually on the international market for the future, the result would be that the coal exports of other countries would have to decrease. I do not know if a British statesman, for example, could face such a contingency without realizing how serious it would be for his own nation. And yet that is the state of affairs. Germany has an enormous number of men who not only want to work but also to eat. And the standard of living among our people is high.
I cannot build the future of the German nation on the assurances of a foreign statesman or on any international help, but only on the real basis of a steady production, for which I must find a market at home or abroad. Perhaps my skepticism in these matters leads me to differ from the British Foreign Secretary in regard to the optimistic tone of his statements. I mean here that if Europe does not awaken to the danger of the Bolshevic infection, then I fear that international commerce will not increase but decrease, despite all the good intentions of individual statesmen. For this commerce is based not only on the undisturbed and guaranteed stability of production in one individual nation but also on the production of all the nations together. One of the first things which is clear in this matter is that every Bolshevic disturbance must necessarily lead to a more or less permanent destruction of orderly production. Therefore my opinion about the future of Europe is, I am sorry to say, not so optimistic as Mr. I am the responsible leader of the German people and must safeguard its interests in this world as well as I can.
And therefore I am bound to judge things objectively as I see them. I should not be acquitted before the bar of our history if I neglected something—no matter on what grounds—which is necessary to maintain the existence of this people. I am pleased, and we are all pleased, at every increase that takes place in our foreign trade. But in view of the obscure political situation I shall not neglect anything that is necessary to guarantee the existence of the German people, although other nations may become the victims of the Bolshevic infection. And I must also repudiate the suggestion that this view is the outcome of mere fancy. For the following is certainly true: The British Foreign Secretary opens out theoretical prospects of existence to us, whereas in reality what is happening is totally different. The revolutionizing of Spain, for instance, has driven out 15.
Should this revolutionizing of Spain spread to other European countries then these damages would not be lessened but increased. I also am a responsible statesman and I must take such possibilities into account. Therefore it is my unalterable determination so to organize German lab our that it will guarantee the maintenance of my people. Eden may rest assured that we shall utilize every possibility offered us of strengthening our economic relations with other nations, but also that we shall avail ourselves of every possibility to improve and enrich the circulation of our own internal trade. I must ask also whether the grounds for assuming that Germany is pursuing a policy of isolation are to be found in the fact that we have left he League of Nations. If such be the grounds, then I would point out that the Geneva League has never been a real League of peoples. A number of great nations do not belong to it or have left it.
And nobody has on this account asserted that they were following a policy of isolation. I think therefore that on this point Mr. Eden misunderstands our intentions and views. For nothing is farther from our wishes than to break off or weaken our political or economic relations with other nations. I have already tried to contribute towards bringing about a good understanding in Europe and I have often given, especially to the British people and their Government, assurance of how ardently we wish for a sincere and cordial cooperation with them. I admit that on one point there is a wide difference between the views of the British Foreign Secretary and our views; and here it seems to me that this is a gap which cannot be filled up. Eden declares that under no circumstances does the British Government wish to see Europe torn into two halves.
Unfortunately, this desire for unity has not hitherto been declared or listened to. And now the desire is an illusion. For the fact is that the division into two halves, not only of Europe but also of the whole world, is an accomplished fact. It is to be regretted that the British Government did not adopt its present attitude at an earlier date, that under all circumstances a division of Europe must be avoided; for then the Treaty of Versailles would not have been entered into. This Treaty brought in the first division of Europe, namely a division of the nations into victors on the one side and vanquished on the other, the latter nations being outlawed. Through this division of Europe nobody suffered more than the German people. That this division was wiped out, so far as concerns Germany, is essentially due to the National Socialist Revolution and this brings some credit to myself.
The second division has been brought about by the proclamation of the Bolshevic doctrine, an integral feature of which is that they do not confine it to one nation but try to impose it on all the nations. Here it is not a question of a special form of national life in Russia but of the Bolshevic demand for a world revolution. If Mr. Eden does not look at Bolshevism as we look at it, that may have something to do with the position of Great Britain and also with some happenings that are unknown to us. But I believe that nobody will question the sincerity of our opinions on this matter, for they are not based merely on abstract theory. For Mr. Eden Bolshevism is perhaps a thing which has its seat in Moscow, but for us in Germany this Bolshevism is a pestilence against which we have had to struggle at the cost of much bloodshed.
It is a pestilence which tried to turn our country into the same kind of desert as is now the case in Spain; for the habit of murdering hostages began here, in the form in which we now see it in Spain. National Socialism did not try to come to grips with Bolshevism in Russia, but the Jewish international Bolshevics in Moscow have tried to introduce their system into Germany and are still trying to do so. Against this attempt we have waged a bitter struggle, not only in defence of our own civilization but in defence of European civilization as a whole. In January and February of the year 1933, when the last decisive struggle against this barbarism was being fought out in Germany, had Germany been defeated in that struggle and had the Bolshevic field of destruction and death extended over Central Europe, then perhaps a different opinion would have arisen on the banks of the Thames as to the nature of this terrible menace to humanity. For since it is said that England must be defended on the frontier of the Rhine she would then have found herself in close contact with that harmless democratic world of Moscow, whose innocence they are always trying to impress upon us. Here I should like to state the following once again: — The teaching of Bolshevism is that there must be a world revolution, which would mean world-destruction. If such a doctrine were accepted and given equal rights with other teachings in Europe, this would mean that Europe would be delivered over to it.
As far as Germany itself is concerned, let there be no doubts on the following points: — 1 We look on Bolshevism as a world peril for which there must be no toleration. It is in accordance with this attitude of ours that we should avoid close contact with the carriers of these poisonous bacilli. And that is also the reason why we do not want to have any closer relations with them beyond the necessary political and commercial relations; for if we went beyond these we might thereby run the risk of closing the eyes of our people to the danger itself. I consider Bolshevism the most malignant poison that can be given to a people. And therefore I do not want my own people to come into contact with this teaching. As a citizen of this nation I myself shall not do what I should have to condemn my fellow-citizens for doing. I demand from every German workman that he shall not have any relations with these international mischief-makers and he shall never see me clinking glasses or rubbing shoulders with them.
Moreover, any further treaty connections with the present Bolshevic Russia would be completely worthless for us. It is out of the question to think that National Socialist Germany should ever be bound to protect Bolshevism or that we, on our side, should ever agree to accept the assistance of a Bolshevic State. For I fear that the moment any nation should agree to accept such assistance, it would thereby seal its own doom. I must also say here that I do not accept the opinion which holds that in the moment of peril the League of nations could come to the rescue of the member States and hold them up by the arms, as it were. Eden stated in his last address that deeds and not speeches are what matters. On that point I should like to call attention to the fact that up to now the outstanding feature of the League of Nations has been talk rather than action. There was one exception and in that case it would probably have been better to have been content with talk.
In this one case, as might have been foreseen, action was fruitless. Hence, just as I have been forced by economic circumstances to depend on our own resources principally for the maintenance of my people, so also I have been forced in the political sphere. And we ourselves are not to blame for that. Three times I have made concrete offers for armament restriction or at least armament limitation. These offers were rejected. In this connection I may recall the fact that the greatest offer which I then made was that Germany and France together should reduce their standing armies to 300,000 men; that Germany, Great Britain and France, should bring down their air force to parity and that Germany and Great Britain should conclude a naval agreement. Only the last offer was accepted and it was the only contribution in the world to a real limitation of armaments.
The other German proposals were either flatly refused or were answered by the conclusion of those alliances which gave Central Europe to Soviet Russia as the field of play for its gigantic forces. Eden speaks of German armaments and expects a limitation of these armaments. We ourselves proposed this limitation long ago. But it had no effect because, instead of accepting our proposal, treaties were made whereby the greatest military power in the world was, according to the terms of the treaties and in fact, introduced into Central Europe. In speaking of armaments it would be well to mention in the first instance the armaments possessed by that Power which sets the standard for the armaments of all others. Eden believes that in the future all States should possess only the armament which is necessary for their de fence. I do not know whether and how far Mr.
Eden has sounded Moscow on the question of carrying that excellent idea into effect, and I do not know what assurances they have given from that quarter. I think however that I ought to put forward one point in this connection. Each nation has the right to judge this for itself, and it alone has the right. If therefore Great Britain today decides for herself on the extent of her armaments everybody in Germany will understand her action; for we can only think of London alone as being competent to decide on what is necessary for the protection of the British Empire. On the other hand I should like to insist that the estimate of our protective needs, and thus of the armament that is necessary for the de fence of our people, is within our own competency and can be decided only in Berlin. I believe that the general recognition of these principles will not render conditions more difficult but will help to release tension. Anyhow Germany is pleased at having found friends in Italy and Japan who hold the same views as ourselves and we should be still more pleased if these convictions were widespread in Europe.
Therefore nobody welcomed more cordially than we did the manifest lessening of tension in the Mediterranean, brought about by the Anglo-Italian agreement. We believe that this will first of all lead to an understanding which may put a stop to, or at least limit, the catastrophe from which poor Spain is suffering. Germany has no interests in that country except the care of those commercial relations which Mr. Eden himself declares to be so important and useful. Our sympathies with General Franco and his Government are in the first place of a general nature and, secondly, they arise from a hope that the consolidation of a real National Spain may lead to a strengthening of economic possibilities in Europe. We are ready to do everything which in any way may contribute towards the restoration of order in Spain. But I think that the following considerations should not be left out of account: — During the last hundred years a number of new nations have been created in Europe which formerly, because of their disunion and weakness, were of only small economic importance and of no political importance at all.
Through the establishment of these new States new tensions have naturally arisen. True statesmanship however must face realities and not shirk them. The Italian nation and the new Italian State are realities. The German nation and the German Reich are likewise realities. And for my my own fellow citizens I should like to state that the Polish nation and the Polish State have also become realities. Also in the Balkans nations have reawakened and have built their own States. The people who belong to those States want to live and they will live.
The unreasonable division of the world into nations that have and nations that have not will not remove or solve that problem, no more than the internal social problems of the nations can be simply solved through more or less clever phrases. For thousands of years the nations asserted their vital claims by the use of power. If in our time some other institution is to take the place of this power for the purpose or regulating relations between the peoples, then it must take account of natural vital claims and decide accordingly. It is the task of the League of Nations only to guarantee the existing state of the world and to safeguard it for all time, then we might just as well entrust it with the task of regulating the ebb and flow of the tides or directing the Gulf Stream into a definite course for the future. But the League of Nations will not be able to do the one or the other. The continuance of its existence will in the long run depend on the extent to which it realize that the necessary reforms which concern international relations must be carefully considered and put into practice. The German people once built up a colonial Empire without robbing anyone and without violating any treaty.
And they did so without any war. That colonial Empire was taken away from us. And the grounds on which it was sought to excuse this act are not tenable. First: It was said that the natives did not want to belong to Germany. Who asked them if they wished to belong to some other Power? And when were these natives ever asked if they had been contented with the Power that formerly ruled them? Second: It is stated that the colonies were not administered properly by the Germans.
Now, Germany had these colonies only for a few decades. Great sacrifices were made in building them up and they were in a process of development which would have led to quite different results than in 1914. But anyhow the colonies had been so developed by us that other people considered it worth while to engage in a sanguinary struggle for the purpose of taking them from us. Third: It is said that they are of no real value.
Und von jetzt ab wird Bombe mit Bombe vergolten! September 1939, Beginn des Zweiten Weltkriegs, reichstagsprotokolle. Ich bin nichts als ein Trommler und ein Sammler.
Lassen Sie uns zusammen arbeiten! Aufgezeichnet von Heinrich Heim, herausgegeben von Werner Jochmann. Hamburg 1980, S. Roosevelt von dieser Erde weggenommen hat, wird sich die Wende des Krieges entscheiden. April 1945; bei John Toland: Adolf Hitler. Bergisch Gladbach 1977, S.
Цитаты адольфа гитлера на немецком с переводом
Я объявляю немецкому народу и всему миру, что Адольф Гитлер вступил как фюрер и рейхсканцлер теперь в замок старой столицы империи, хранительницы короны империи. My German Fellow Countrymen and Women, My Comrades! At present everybody speaks before the forum which seems to them the most fitting. Some speak before a parliament whose existence, composition and origin (are well known). I believe that I should return again today whence I came. Der Fuerer ist gefallen-Сообщение немецкого радио о смерти Адольфа Гитлера 1 мая 1945 года. и другие mp3 песни этого артиста и похожие треки. Звук с фразой "Гитлер капут" на немецком языке (мужской голос).
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Цитаты Гитлера на немецком
- Известные цитаты Гитлера (100 цитат)
- Фразы для татуировок на немецком языке с переводом
- List of speeches given by Adolf Hitler - Wikipedia
Search the Holocaust Encyclopedia
- Афоризмы на немецком языке
- Фразы на немецком Гитлера:
- Речь Гитлера после воссоединения Австрии с Германией: bell_mess — LiveJournal
- Цитаты адольфа гитлера на немецком с переводом - Научные работы на
Цитаты Адольфа Гитлера
За учение придется платить: ведь не всегда же удастся избежать промахов. Но какое это имеет значение, если через 10 лет мне смогут доложить: «Данциг, Эльзас, Лотарингия принадлежат Германии; правда, в Кольмаре Верхний Эльзас допущено 3 или 4 промаха, а там-то 5 или 10». На это мы можем пойти, лишь бы удержать в своих руках сами провинции. Зато через 10 лет, когда назревшие к тому времени задачи потребуют своих исполнителей, у нас будут отборные кадры, о которых можно без колебаний сказать: вот это дело мы поручим такому-то, а это - такому-то. Тогда отсортируется новая порода людей, истинных повелителей по натуре, которых, впрочем, на Западе использовать нельзя: вице-короли. Страной, где родилось английское самосознание, является Индия.
Колоссальные пространства Индии вынудили их управлять миллионами с помощью небольшого количества людей. Наряду с этим важную роль в становлении английского самосознания сыграло то, что англичане снабжали крупные европейские комплексы продовольствием и предметами потребления. Англичанам и в голову не могло прийти, что можно горсткой людей регламентировать жизнь новых континентов; не занималась миссионерской деятельностью и англиканская церковь. В этом были свои Положительные черты: люди чужих континентов видели, что святые для них ценности остаются неприкосновенными. Немец вызвал ненависть к себе во всем мире тем, что, где бы ни появлялся, принимал на себя роль повелителя.
Народам не было от этого решительно никакой пользы. Ведь передававшиеся местному населению ценности вовсе не были ценностями с его точки зрения. Так, сознание долга в нашем понимании не существует в России. Зачем же воспитывать его у русских? Когда мы будем осваивать русское пространство, то «имперские крестьяне» должны будут жить в селениях выдающейся красоты.
Немецкие административные и прочие учреждения должны размещаться в прекрасных зданиях, а губернаторы - во дворцах. Вокруг учреждений будет построено все то, что необходимо для жизни. А вокруг каждого города, в радиусе 30-40 км, будут кольцом располагаться красивые деревни, соединенные первоклассными дорогами. Все, что лежит за пределами этого кольца — иной мир, где мы разрешим русским жить, как они хотят. Лишь бы мы господствовали над ними.
В случае какой-то революции нам будет достаточно сбросить на их города пару-другую бомб - и вопрос решен. Раз в год мы будем проводить через столицу империи партию киргизов, чтобы в их сознании запечатлелась мощь и величие каменных памятников этого города. Чем для Англии была Индия, тем для нас станет восточное пространство. Ах, если бы я мог довести до сознания немецкого народа, сколь велико значение этого пространства для будущего! Колонии - владения сомнительного достоинства.
А эта земля всегда будет нашей. Европа - понятие не географическое, а обусловленное расовыми факторами. В наше время уже понятно, почему китайцам пришла в голову мысль отгородиться каменной стеной от вечных монгольских нашествий. И потому кое-кто впадает в искушение соорудить гигантский вал, который укроет новый Восток от среднеазиатских масс. Однако при этом забывают историю, которая учит, что во всяком отгороженном пространстве неизбежно наступает прострация.
В конечном итоге лучшей стеной всегда является вал живой. Уж если какая-то нация имеет право на выселение чужих народов с насиженных мест, то это прежде всего мы, потому что мы неоднократно выселяли со своей территории людей. Из одной только Восточной Пруссии было выселено 800000 человек. А насколько немцы сентиментальны, видно хотя бы из того, что нам казалось страшной жестокостью освободить свою землю от 600000 евреев, между тем как эвакуацию наших собственных людей мы покорно восприняли как должное. Нельзя больше допускать эмиграцию из Европы в Америку представителей германской расы.
Всех норвежцев, шведов, датчан, голландцев мы должны направить в восточные области; они будут служить империи. Перед нами великая задача будущего: проведение планомерной расовой политики. Мы вынуждены этим заняться уже потому, что необходимо воспрепятствовать кровосмешению, которое у нас все больше распространяется. Что же касается швейцарцев, то их придется использовать лишь в качестве трактирщиков. Болот мы осваивать не будем.
Мы возьмем лишь земли высокого качества, на первом этапе - даже самые лучшие. А на заболоченных территориях можно будет устроить гигантские зоны войсковых учений размером 300 на 4000 км, пересеченные реками и всеми прочими препятствиями, которые могут встретиться войскам на местности. В восточных областях мы устроим великолепные колонии, выселив туда эти этнические группы вырождающихся из-за кровосмешения венгерских немцев. Правда, всякое переселение будет совершаться за наш счет. Но если я одновременно отниму у другого территорию, то расходы окупятся.
Весь этот вопрос представляет собою проблему осуществляемого государством насилия, проблему власти! В общем, я лично полагаю, что немцев следует из Венгрии изъять, если только мы действительно желаем жить в мире с венграми. Этот вопрос надо обдумать всесторонне. Иное решение возможно, пожалуй, в том случае, если мы захотим вновь превратить Дунай в немецкую реку на всем его протяжении. Но тогда политика должна быть другой.
Одно из решений может состоять в переселении всех внеимперских немцев, проживающих к юго-востоку от Германии, на берега Дуная. Ведь венгры с румынами все равно никогда не помирятся, даже если увидят после этой акции в лице Германии общего врага. Жителям Баната надо тоже дать такую же хорошую землю. Если я буду иметь на Востоке 1,5 миллиона внеимперских немцев, то я должен построить автомагистраль длиной в 1500 км и нанизать на нее, словно жемчужины на нитку, поселения через каждые 50-100 километров, а также основать несколько более значительных по своему размеру городов. Правда, даже если принять эту точку зрения, то все же приходишь к выводу, что Север важнее Юга.
Однако: Дунай есть Дунай, его ничем не заменишь. Нужно колонизовать и район Железных Ворот, чтобы никто не мог их закрыть. К сожалению, это очень плохая область. Хороших немцев туда не посадишь. Но можно заселить эту область специалистами по добыче меди, жителями югославской области Бор.
Это одна из лучших возможностей добраться до меди, тем более что мы не очень-то дружим с югославами. А ту часть добытого вместе с медью марганца, которую мне нежелательно будет пускать в обработку там, на месте, я смогу отправить вверх по Дунаю. Затем, Дунай обеспечивает связь с Турцией. Делать мировую политику может лишь тот, у кого развязаны руки в тылу.
Афоризмы Гитлера. Гитлер мы тогда победим Россию. Гитлер украинец. Гитлер о белоруссах и украинцах. Россия победила. Мудрые цитаты Гитлера.
Гитлер Великий человек. Самые известные высказывания Гитлера. Цитаты про фашизм. Чубайс Гитлер. Цитаты Адольфа Гитлера о славянах. Гитлер 1941 речь. Недочеловеки Гиммлер. Фразы о фашизме. Высказывания о бандеровцах. Гитлер социалист.
Гитлер мы могли бы назваться либеральной партией. Мы могли бы назвать себя либеральной партией Гитлер. Адольф Гитлер еврей. Высказывания Гитлера о евреях. Адольф Гитлер цитаты про евреев. Приколы про Гитлера и Сталина. Фюрер всея Руси. Путинская Россия и гитлеровская Германия. Сравнение Путина и Гитлера. Сходство Путина и Гитлера.
Высказывание Гиммлера о славянах. Русские арийцы Гиммлер. Высказывания Гитлера о Сталине. Стихи Сталина. Сталин стихи. Сталин Гитлеры приходят и уходят а немецкий народ остается. Сталин о немецком народе. Опыт истории говорит, что Гитлеры приходят и уходят. Сталин о немцах Гитлеры приходят. Адольф Гитлер цитаты о России.
Володин есть Путин есть Россия нет Путина нет России. Россия это Путин Володин. Володин есть Путин есть Россия. Нет Путина нет России Володин. Адольф Гитлер социалист.
That I carried out the measures which were necessary for this purpose without consulting our former enemies in each case, and even without informing them, was due to my conviction that the way in which I chose to act would make it easier for the other side to accept our decisions, for they would have had to accept them in any case. I should like to add here that, at all this has now been accomplished, the so-called period of surprises has come to an end. As a State which is now on an equal juridical footing with all the other States, Germany is more conscious than ever that she has a European task before here, which is to collaborate loyally in getting rid of those problems that are the cause of anxiety to ourselves and also to the other nations. If I may state my views on those general questions that are of actual importance today, the most effective way of doing so will be to refer to the statements that were recently made by Mr. Eden in the British House of Commons. At this point I should like to express my sincere thanks for the opportunity which has been given me by the outspoken and noteworthy declarations made by the British Foreign Secretary. I think I have read those statements carefully and have understood them correctly. Of course, I do not want to get lost among the details, and so I should like to single out the leading points in Mr. In doing this, I shall first try to correct what seems to me to be a most regrettable error. This error lay in assuming that somehow or other Germany wishes to isolate herself and to allow the events which happen in the rest of the world to pass by without participating in them, or that she does not wish to take any account whatsoever of the general necessities of the time. What are the grounds for the assumption that Germany wants to pursue a policy of isolation? If this a such an attitude, then the most than [sic] can be said is that it has been forced to do so under the coercion of a foreign will imposed upon it. Now, in the first place, I should like to assure Mr. Eden that we Germans do not in the least want to be isolated and that we do not at all feel ourselves isolated. During recent years Germany has entered into quite a number of political agreements with other States. She has resumed former agreements and improved them. And I may say that she has established close friendly relations with a number of States. Our relations with most of the European States are normal from our standpoint and we are on terms of close friendship with quite a number. Among all those diplomatic connections I would give a special place in the foreground to those excellent relations which we have with those States that were liberated from sufferings similar to those we had to endure and have consequently arrived at similar decisions. Through a number of treaties which we have made, we have relieved many strained relations and thereby made a substantial contribution towards an improvement in European conditions. I need remind you only of our agreement with Poland, which has turned out advantageous for both countries, our agreement with Austria and the excellent and close relations which we have established with Italy. Finally, I may mention our cordial relations with a whole series of nations outside of Europe. The agreement which Germany has made with Japan for combating the movement directed by the Comintern is a vital proof of how little the German Government thinks of isolating itself and how little we feel ourselves actually isolated. Furthermore, I have on several ocassions [sic] declared that it is our wish and hope to arrive at good cordial relations with all our neighbors. Germany has steadily given its assurance, and I solemnly repeat this assurance here, that between ourselves and France, for example, there are no grounds for quarrel that are humanly thinkable. Furthermore, the German Government has assured Belgium and Holland that it is ready to recognize and guarantee these States as neutral regions in perpetuity. In view of the declarations which we have made in the past and in view of the existing state of affairs, I cannot quite clearly see why Germany should consider herself isolated or why we should pursue a policy of isolation. From the economic standpoint there are no grounds for asserting that Germany is withdrawing from international cooperation. The contrary is the truth. On looking over the speeches which several statesmen have made within the last few months, I find that they might easily give rise to the impression that the whole world is waiting to shower economic favors on Germany but that we, who are represented as obstinately clinging to a policy of isolation, do not wish to partake of those favors To place this whole matter in its true light, I should like to call attention to the following bare facts: — 1 For many years the German people have been trying to make better commercial treaties with their neighbors. And these efforts have not been in vain; for, as a matter of fact, German foreign trade has increased since 1932, both in volume and in value. This is the clearest refutation of the assertion that Germany is pursuing a policy of economic isolation. Credit manipulation may perhaps have a temporary effect, but in the long run economic international relations will be decisively influenced by the volume of mutual exchange of goods. And here the state of affairs at the present moment is not such that the outside world would be able to place huge orders with us or offer prospects of an increase in the exchange of goods even if we were to fulfil the most extraordinary conditions that they might lay down. Matters should not be made more complicated than they already are. But Germany cannot be blamed for these two things, and especially not National Socialist Germany. When we assumed power the world economic crisis was worse than it is today. I fear however that I must interpret Mr. Therefore I wish it to be clearly understood that our decision to carry out this plan is unalterable. The reasons which led to that decision were inexorable. And since then I have not been able to discover anything whatsoever that might induce us to discontinue the four years plan. I shall take only one practical example: In carrying out the four years plan our synthetic production of rubber and petrol will necessitate an annual increase in our consumption of coal by a margin of something between 20 and 30 million tons. This means that an extra quota of thousands of coal miners are assured of employment for the rest of their active lives. I must really take the liberty of asking this question: Supposing we abondon [sic] the German four years plan, then what statesman can guarantee me some economic equivalent or other, outside of the Reich, for these thirty million tons of coal? I want bread and work for my people. And certainly I do not wish to have it through the operation of credit guarantees, but through solid and permanent lab our, the products of which I can either exchange for foreign goods or for domestic goods in our internal commercial circulation. If by some manipulation or other Germany were to throw these 20 or 30 million tons of coal annually on the international market for the future, the result would be that the coal exports of other countries would have to decrease. I do not know if a British statesman, for example, could face such a contingency without realizing how serious it would be for his own nation. And yet that is the state of affairs. Germany has an enormous number of men who not only want to work but also to eat. And the standard of living among our people is high. I cannot build the future of the German nation on the assurances of a foreign statesman or on any international help, but only on the real basis of a steady production, for which I must find a market at home or abroad. Perhaps my skepticism in these matters leads me to differ from the British Foreign Secretary in regard to the optimistic tone of his statements. I mean here that if Europe does not awaken to the danger of the Bolshevic infection, then I fear that international commerce will not increase but decrease, despite all the good intentions of individual statesmen. For this commerce is based not only on the undisturbed and guaranteed stability of production in one individual nation but also on the production of all the nations together. One of the first things which is clear in this matter is that every Bolshevic disturbance must necessarily lead to a more or less permanent destruction of orderly production. Therefore my opinion about the future of Europe is, I am sorry to say, not so optimistic as Mr. I am the responsible leader of the German people and must safeguard its interests in this world as well as I can. And therefore I am bound to judge things objectively as I see them. I should not be acquitted before the bar of our history if I neglected something—no matter on what grounds—which is necessary to maintain the existence of this people. I am pleased, and we are all pleased, at every increase that takes place in our foreign trade. But in view of the obscure political situation I shall not neglect anything that is necessary to guarantee the existence of the German people, although other nations may become the victims of the Bolshevic infection. And I must also repudiate the suggestion that this view is the outcome of mere fancy. For the following is certainly true: The British Foreign Secretary opens out theoretical prospects of existence to us, whereas in reality what is happening is totally different. The revolutionizing of Spain, for instance, has driven out 15. Should this revolutionizing of Spain spread to other European countries then these damages would not be lessened but increased. I also am a responsible statesman and I must take such possibilities into account. Therefore it is my unalterable determination so to organize German lab our that it will guarantee the maintenance of my people. Eden may rest assured that we shall utilize every possibility offered us of strengthening our economic relations with other nations, but also that we shall avail ourselves of every possibility to improve and enrich the circulation of our own internal trade. I must ask also whether the grounds for assuming that Germany is pursuing a policy of isolation are to be found in the fact that we have left he League of Nations. If such be the grounds, then I would point out that the Geneva League has never been a real League of peoples. A number of great nations do not belong to it or have left it. And nobody has on this account asserted that they were following a policy of isolation. I think therefore that on this point Mr. Eden misunderstands our intentions and views. For nothing is farther from our wishes than to break off or weaken our political or economic relations with other nations. I have already tried to contribute towards bringing about a good understanding in Europe and I have often given, especially to the British people and their Government, assurance of how ardently we wish for a sincere and cordial cooperation with them. I admit that on one point there is a wide difference between the views of the British Foreign Secretary and our views; and here it seems to me that this is a gap which cannot be filled up. Eden declares that under no circumstances does the British Government wish to see Europe torn into two halves. Unfortunately, this desire for unity has not hitherto been declared or listened to. And now the desire is an illusion. For the fact is that the division into two halves, not only of Europe but also of the whole world, is an accomplished fact. It is to be regretted that the British Government did not adopt its present attitude at an earlier date, that under all circumstances a division of Europe must be avoided; for then the Treaty of Versailles would not have been entered into. This Treaty brought in the first division of Europe, namely a division of the nations into victors on the one side and vanquished on the other, the latter nations being outlawed. Through this division of Europe nobody suffered more than the German people. That this division was wiped out, so far as concerns Germany, is essentially due to the National Socialist Revolution and this brings some credit to myself. The second division has been brought about by the proclamation of the Bolshevic doctrine, an integral feature of which is that they do not confine it to one nation but try to impose it on all the nations. Here it is not a question of a special form of national life in Russia but of the Bolshevic demand for a world revolution. If Mr. Eden does not look at Bolshevism as we look at it, that may have something to do with the position of Great Britain and also with some happenings that are unknown to us. But I believe that nobody will question the sincerity of our opinions on this matter, for they are not based merely on abstract theory. For Mr. Eden Bolshevism is perhaps a thing which has its seat in Moscow, but for us in Germany this Bolshevism is a pestilence against which we have had to struggle at the cost of much bloodshed. It is a pestilence which tried to turn our country into the same kind of desert as is now the case in Spain; for the habit of murdering hostages began here, in the form in which we now see it in Spain. National Socialism did not try to come to grips with Bolshevism in Russia, but the Jewish international Bolshevics in Moscow have tried to introduce their system into Germany and are still trying to do so. Against this attempt we have waged a bitter struggle, not only in defence of our own civilization but in defence of European civilization as a whole. In January and February of the year 1933, when the last decisive struggle against this barbarism was being fought out in Germany, had Germany been defeated in that struggle and had the Bolshevic field of destruction and death extended over Central Europe, then perhaps a different opinion would have arisen on the banks of the Thames as to the nature of this terrible menace to humanity. For since it is said that England must be defended on the frontier of the Rhine she would then have found herself in close contact with that harmless democratic world of Moscow, whose innocence they are always trying to impress upon us. Here I should like to state the following once again: — The teaching of Bolshevism is that there must be a world revolution, which would mean world-destruction. If such a doctrine were accepted and given equal rights with other teachings in Europe, this would mean that Europe would be delivered over to it. As far as Germany itself is concerned, let there be no doubts on the following points: — 1 We look on Bolshevism as a world peril for which there must be no toleration. It is in accordance with this attitude of ours that we should avoid close contact with the carriers of these poisonous bacilli. And that is also the reason why we do not want to have any closer relations with them beyond the necessary political and commercial relations; for if we went beyond these we might thereby run the risk of closing the eyes of our people to the danger itself. I consider Bolshevism the most malignant poison that can be given to a people. And therefore I do not want my own people to come into contact with this teaching. As a citizen of this nation I myself shall not do what I should have to condemn my fellow-citizens for doing. I demand from every German workman that he shall not have any relations with these international mischief-makers and he shall never see me clinking glasses or rubbing shoulders with them. Moreover, any further treaty connections with the present Bolshevic Russia would be completely worthless for us. It is out of the question to think that National Socialist Germany should ever be bound to protect Bolshevism or that we, on our side, should ever agree to accept the assistance of a Bolshevic State. For I fear that the moment any nation should agree to accept such assistance, it would thereby seal its own doom. I must also say here that I do not accept the opinion which holds that in the moment of peril the League of nations could come to the rescue of the member States and hold them up by the arms, as it were. Eden stated in his last address that deeds and not speeches are what matters. On that point I should like to call attention to the fact that up to now the outstanding feature of the League of Nations has been talk rather than action. There was one exception and in that case it would probably have been better to have been content with talk. In this one case, as might have been foreseen, action was fruitless. Hence, just as I have been forced by economic circumstances to depend on our own resources principally for the maintenance of my people, so also I have been forced in the political sphere. And we ourselves are not to blame for that. Three times I have made concrete offers for armament restriction or at least armament limitation. These offers were rejected. In this connection I may recall the fact that the greatest offer which I then made was that Germany and France together should reduce their standing armies to 300,000 men; that Germany, Great Britain and France, should bring down their air force to parity and that Germany and Great Britain should conclude a naval agreement. Only the last offer was accepted and it was the only contribution in the world to a real limitation of armaments. The other German proposals were either flatly refused or were answered by the conclusion of those alliances which gave Central Europe to Soviet Russia as the field of play for its gigantic forces. Eden speaks of German armaments and expects a limitation of these armaments. We ourselves proposed this limitation long ago. But it had no effect because, instead of accepting our proposal, treaties were made whereby the greatest military power in the world was, according to the terms of the treaties and in fact, introduced into Central Europe. In speaking of armaments it would be well to mention in the first instance the armaments possessed by that Power which sets the standard for the armaments of all others. Eden believes that in the future all States should possess only the armament which is necessary for their de fence. I do not know whether and how far Mr. Eden has sounded Moscow on the question of carrying that excellent idea into effect, and I do not know what assurances they have given from that quarter. I think however that I ought to put forward one point in this connection. Each nation has the right to judge this for itself, and it alone has the right. If therefore Great Britain today decides for herself on the extent of her armaments everybody in Germany will understand her action; for we can only think of London alone as being competent to decide on what is necessary for the protection of the British Empire. On the other hand I should like to insist that the estimate of our protective needs, and thus of the armament that is necessary for the de fence of our people, is within our own competency and can be decided only in Berlin. I believe that the general recognition of these principles will not render conditions more difficult but will help to release tension. Anyhow Germany is pleased at having found friends in Italy and Japan who hold the same views as ourselves and we should be still more pleased if these convictions were widespread in Europe. Therefore nobody welcomed more cordially than we did the manifest lessening of tension in the Mediterranean, brought about by the Anglo-Italian agreement.
Очень полезно изучать не только отдельные слова на иностранном языке, но и целые выражения. Это поможет понять всю суть сказанного, и поможет сохранить его в своей памяти на долгое время. Особого внимания заслуживают интересные высказывания всем известного немецкого политика и оратора Гитлера, который высказывался на многие темы, начиная от народа и заканчивая темой любви. В нашей подборке можно прочитать осмысленные и известные цитаты Гитлера на немецком языке. Некоторые из выражений очень трудны к пониманию и заставляют задуматься каждого человека. Jede Generation muss sich am Krieg beteiligen. Niemand wird den Gewinner fragen, ob er die Wahrheit gesagt hat oder nicht.