Опозорили Германию перед всем миром.
Полный текст заявления Гитлера от 22 июня 1941 года
Очень полезно изучать не только отдельные слова на иностранном языке, но и целые выражения. Это поможет понять всю суть сказанного, и поможет сохранить его в своей памяти на долгое время. Особого внимания заслуживают интересные высказывания всем известного немецкого политика и оратора Гитлера, который высказывался на многие темы, начиная от народа и заканчивая темой любви. В нашей подборке можно прочитать осмысленные и известные цитаты Гитлера на немецком языке. Некоторые из выражений очень трудны к пониманию и заставляют задуматься каждого человека. Jede Generation muss sich am Krieg beteiligen. Niemand wird den Gewinner fragen, ob er die Wahrheit gesagt hat oder nicht.
Адольф Гитлер и другие вожди партии чаще всего повторяли эти слова в конце своих речей троекратно: «Зиг… хайль! Зиг… хайль! Лозунг был придуман Рудольфом Гессом : на одном из съездов НСДАП в Нюрнберге после речи Гитлера, когда тот долго стоял в задумчивости, находившийся рядом Гесс, впечатлившийся речью Гитлера, начал выкрикивать словосочетание «Зиг хайль! Август Ландмессер среди рабочих верфи не поднял руку в нацистском приветствии Преследования за отказ произносить нацистское приветствие править Нацисты требовали от жителей Германии произносить нацистское приветствие [6] [7]. Но, по мнению свидетелей Иеговы , произносить выражение «Heil Hitler! Поэтому свидетели Иеговы отказывались произносить нацистское приветствие [10] [11] [12].
It is not Germany who is responsible for them, however, but rather the jugglers of Versailles, who either in their maliciousness or their thoughtlessness placed 100 powder barrels round about in Europe, all equipped with hardly extinguishable lighted fuses. These problems cannot be solved according to old-fashioned ideas; I think, rather, that we should adopt new methods. Their importance is exclusively psychological and economic. To accord military importance to a traffic route of this kind, would be to show oneself completely ignorant of military affairs. Consequently, I have had the following proposal submitted to the Polish Government:- 1 Danzig returns as a Free State into the framework of the German Reich. In return, Germany is prepared:- 1 To recognise all Polish economic rights in Danzig. The Polish Government have rejected my offer and have only declared that they are prepared 1 to negotiate concerning the question of a substitute for the Commissioner of the League of Nations and 2 to consider facilities for the transit traffic through the Corridor. I have regretted greatly this incomprehensible attitude of the Polish Government, but that alone is not the decisive fact, the worst is that now Poland, like Czecho-Slovakia a year ago, believes, under the pressure of a lying international campaign, that it must call up troops, although Germany on her part has not called up a single man and had not thought of proceeding in any way against Poland. As I have said, this is in itself very regrettable and posterity will one day decide whether it was really right to refuse this suggestion made this once by me. This-as I have said-was an endeavour on my part to solve a question which intimately affects the German people by a truly unique compromise, and to solve it to the advantage of both countries. According to my conviction Poland was not a giving party in this solution at all but only a receiving party, because it should be beyond all doubt that Danzig will never become Polish. The intention to attack on the part of Germany, which was merely invented by the international press, led as you know to the so-called guarantee offer and to an obligation on the part of the Polish Government for mutual assistance, which would also, under certain circumstances, compel Poland to take military action against Germany in the event of a conflict between Germany and any other Power and in which England, in her turn, would be involved. This obligation is contradictory to the agreement which I made with Marshal Pilsudski some time ago, seeing that in this agreement reference is made exclusively to existing obligations, that is at that time, namely, to the obligations of Poland towards France of which we were aware. To extend these obligations subsequently is contrary to the terms of the German-Polish non-aggression pact. Under these circumstances I should not have entered into this pact at that time, because what sense can non-aggression pacts have if in practice leaves open an enormous number of one partner exceptions. There is either collective security, that is collective insecurity and continuous danger of war, or clear agreements which, however, exclude fundamentally any use of arms between the contracting parties. I therefore look upon the agreement which Marshal Pilsudski and I at one time concluded as having been unilaterally infringed by Poland and thereby no longer in existence! I have sent a communication to this effect to the Polish Government.
От дурной головы и ногам покоя нет. Слова нам нужны, чтобы прятать наши мысли. Meine Mutter ist mein Engel. Моямама - мойангел. Пьяныйпроспится, дуракникогда. Рыба ищет, где глубже, а человек где лучше. Um so mehr du sagst, an um so weniger erinnern sich die Menschen Чем больше Вы говорите, тем меньше люди запоминают. Влюбвирукииглазаговорятобычногромче, чемрот. С кем поведёшься, от того и наберёшься. Sieben sollen nicht harren auf einen Narren. Слово-серебро, молчание-золото. Если тебе говорят, что уже поздно — то ты потерял не время, а значимость. Ein voller Bauch studiert nie gern. Сытое брюхо к ученью глухо. Я чувствую твое тепло здесь, но, к сожалению ты не со мной. Завтра я буду скучать по тебе не больше, поскольку я смогу поцеловать тебя еще раз. Menschen durch die Liebe. Плоды созревают на солнце. Люди через любовь. Die Furcht hat tausend Augen. У страха глаза велики. Ты для меня солнце, ты для меня дом родной, ты для меня счастье мира, даже если он тебе не нравиться. Eigene Last ist nicht schwer. Своя ноша не тянет. Das Ende klang wie Grabgesang. Начали за здравие, закончили за упокой. Doch von diesen 1000 Herzen liebt Dich keines so wie ich! Но эти 1000 сердец любят вас не так как я! Was du heute kannst besorgen, das verschiebe nicht auf morgen. Не откладывай на завтра то, что можно сделать сегодня. Sie kommen oft im Moment, wenn sie notwendig sind. Не стоит бояться перемен. Часто они случаются именно в тот момент, когда они необходимы. Ist der Kopf abgeschlagen, wird niemand nach dem Hute fragen. Снявши голову, по волосам не плачут Die Dummen werden nicht alle. Sei in sich selbst sicher und gib nicht nach. Будь уверен в себе и никогда не сдавайся. Мир принадлежит тому, кто ему рад. Воспоминания удивительная штука: согревает изнутри и тут же рвёт на части. Der Appetit kommt beim Essen. Ты главное ешь, а аппетит появится. Только любовь сильнее смерти. Wer fremde Sprache nicht kennt,weiss nichts von seiner eigenen. Тот, кто не знает иностранных языков, не знает ничего и о своём собственном. Все дороги ведут в Рим. Aller Anfang ist schwer. Первый блин комом. Лиха беда начало. Кто обжегся на молоке теперь на воду дует. Paradies: Der Ort, wo Menschen die Liebe ernster nehmen als sich selbst. Рай: место, где люди принимают любовь более серьезно, чем самих себя Geduld bringt Rosen. Терпение и труд все перетрут. Терпи, казак, атаманом будешь. Was Du lernen willst zu tun, lernst Du, indem Du es tust. Тому, чему ты хочешь научиться, учишься ты, делая это. Allen Leuten recht getan ist eine Kunst, die niemand kann На вкус и цвет - товарищей нет. Gute Saat, gute Ernte. Что посеешь, то и пожнёшь. Durch Fehler wird man klug. Reden ist Silber, Schweigen ist Gold. Слово - серебро, молчание - золото. Без труда не вытащить и рыбки из пруда. В любви руки и глаза говорят обычно громче, чем рот. Klein, aber fein. Маленький, да удаленький; Мал золотник, да дорог. Morgen, morgen, nur nicht heute, sagen alle faulen Leute. Не откладывай на завтра то, что можешь сделать сегодня.
"Why We Are Antisemites" - Text of Adolf Hitler's 1920 speech at the Hofbräuhaus
Речь 27. Речь 20. Эта организация будет построена на идее авторитета, идее руководства снизу доверху. Только такая организация может служить интересам всего народа.
Речь 06. Прокламация 01. Речь 16.
Второе: Решение тяжелейшей социальной проблемы путем возвращения миллионной армии наших, достойных всяческого сочувствия, безработных обратно на производство. Третье: Восстановление стабильного и авторитетного государственного руководства, опирающегося на доверие и волю нации; руководства, которое снова вернет нашему великому народу способность выполнять свои обязательства перед миром. Речь 17.
Наша национальная гордость заключается не в том, чтобы презирать других, а в том, чтобы уважать и любить свой народ! Речь 01. Речь 24.
Он неуклонно и в первую очередь будет думать о соблюдении интересов народа в вопросах мира, работы и культуры. Я был солдатом и видел все собственными глазами, в отличие от очень многих других государственных деятелей, которые сами этого никогда не переживали. И я, разумеется, отвергаю войну.
Но отвергаю я ее не как изменник, предатель и трус, а как порядочный немец, честно выполнивший свой воинский долг на фронте, и желающий оставаться порядочным до конца. Поэтому я в равной мере не оставлю на произвол судьбы ни права немецкого народа на жизнь, ни его права на честь. Эти люди — повсюду, но нигде они не дома.
Речь 10. Также и народом являются только те, кто способен, если потребуется, выступить как единый народ навстречу любым испытаниям. Я создал … совершенно новое движение.
Движение, которое с самого своего зарождения и вопреки всем явлениям распада в окружавшей его действительности вновь созидало народную общность. Лишь в этом случае государство способно полноценно выполнять свои социальные обязательства. Истинную ценность любому движению придают только люди.
Люди, которые, руководствуясь смыслом этого движения, воплощают его идеи в жизнь. Речь 07. Речь 05.
В структурах, которым принадлежит реальная власть, под «свободой» подразумевается их возможность грабить широкие массы населения, без каких-либо ограничений, и не встречая хоть сколько-нибудь серьезного сопротивления. Речь 28. Инструменты финансового еврейства.
Речь 21. Герой стал презираем, трус — почитаем; добросовестность оказалась наказуема, нерадивость — вознаграждаема.
For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in tha art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes. From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited.
Is not their very existance founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. Mein Kampf, 1925.
Впереди вас ждет много чего интересного и полезного. Начните свою жизнь - по новому и с чистого листа. Желаю всем удачи и только добра. Показать больше.
Гитлер цитаты социалист. Слова Гитлера. Известные цитаты Гитлера. Фашистские высказывания. Стихи про фашизм. Речь Гитлера текст. Выступление Гитлера с переводом. Высказывания Гитлера о русских. Цитаты Гитлера на русском. Листовки Гитлера. Текст Гитлера на немецком. Гитлеровские речи на немецком. Гитлер начал вторую мировую войну. Высказывания Гитлера о войне. Цитата Гитлера про войну. Высказывания немцев о украинцах. Гитлер про украинцев и русских. Нацистские высказывания. Афоризмы Адольфа Гитлера. Выступление Гитлера 1941. Речь Гитлера на русском. Слова Гитлера о русских. Высказывания Гитлера о славянах. Цитаты Гитлера о евреях. Цитаты Сталина. Высказывания великих людей о Сталине. Высказывания о Сталине. Великие люди о Сталине цитаты. Геббельс про ложь и правду. Йозеф Геббельс пропаганда. Йозеф Геббельс цитаты. Гитлер был нацистом. Фашист и Патриот. Гитлер о социализме цитата. Гитлер Украина. Русские должны умереть, чтобы жили мы немцы. Мы обязаны истреблять население. Гитлер заявил мы обязаны истребить населения. Мы обязаны истребить население низшей расы. Планы Гитлера. Только водка и табак.
Полный текст обращения Гитлера к немецкому народу 22 июня 1941 года
| "Why We Are Antisemites" - Text of Adolf Hitler's 1920 speech at the Hofbräuhaus | Carolyn Yeager | Adolf Hitler said in a speech: Wenn es dem internationalen Finanzjudentum in und außerhalb Europas gelingen sollte, die Völker noch einmal in einen Weltkrieg zu stürzen, dann wird das Ergebnis nicht der Sieg des Judentums sein, sondern die Vernichtung der jüdischen Rasse in Europa! If international. |
| Der Fuerer ist gefallen-Сообщение немецкого радио о смерти Адольфа Гитлера 1 мая 1945 года. | (русский текст внизу) Russland hat eine Rede Adolf Hitlers freigegeben, nota bene mit russischen Untertiteln versehen. Die Botschaft an die Machthaber weltweit und an die "Elite" in Amerika kann deutlicher nicht sein: Was AH damals sagte, es trifft exakt auf heute zu. Es mag traurig sein, es ist wahr. |
| Обращение Адольфа Гитлера к германскому народу 22 июня 1941 | Известные цитаты Гитлера (100 цитат). |
| Высказывания адольфа гитлера. Цитаты на немецком языке с переводом | Выражение “Гитлер капут” имеет хорошие шансы навсегда выветриться из коллективной памяти немцев. |
Полный текст заявления Гитлера от 22 июня 1941 года
Воззвание Фюрера к Германскому Народу и Нота Министерства Иностранных Дел Германии Советскому Правительству с приложениями. On September 12, 1938, Adolf Hitler, Chancellor of the Reich, addressed the German Reichstag. That morning, The German Reich had crossed the German-Czech frontier, thus initiating the Invasion of Czechoslovakia. Delegates, Men of the German Reichstag! For months we have been suffering under. Wir wollen nicht lügen und wollen nicht schwindeln. Ich habe deshalb es abgelehnt, jemals vor dieses Volk hinzutreten und billige Versprechungen zu geben. In uns selbst allein liegt die Zukunft des deutschen Volkes. Wenn wir selbst dieses deutsche Volk emporführen zu eigener Arbeit, zu eigenem. Афоризмы, цитаты, высказывания знаменитых людей в переводе с немецкого на русский язык. Цитаты, фразы и афоризмы на немецком с переводом.”.
Цитаты Адольфа Гитлера
| Знаменитый фрагмент из фильма “Der Untergang” (рус. “Бункер”) — Речь Гитлера в бункере | speech to the Reichstag. September 15, 1935. On behalf of the German Reich Government, I have requested Reichstag President Pg. Goring to convene for today a session of the German Reichstag in Nuremberg. The place was chosen because, by virtue of the National Socialist. |
| служба утерянных цитат - 9 | Цитаты, фразы и афоризмы на немецком с переводом.”. |
Bevor Adolf Hitler berühmt wurde... (Teil 1)
- Смотрим вместе, и я даю свой лексический и грамматический комментарий
- Воззвание фюрера к немецкому народу 22 июня 1941 г. - Нацистская пропаганда против СССР.
- Речь Адольфа Гитлера в Рейхстаге 1 сентября 1939 года | Пикабу
- Adolf Hitler - Speech (1933) | Текст песни
Содержание
- Bevor Adolf Hitler berühmt wurde... (Teil 1)
- Adolf Hitler Speeches
- Excerpts of Hitler’s Speeches on German-Polish Peace, 1935-1939 | Justice for Germans
- Цитаты Гитлера - Буридо
Полный текст обращения Гитлера к немецкому народу 22 июня 1941 года
Всякое великое движение на земле обязано своим ростом великим ораторам, а не великим писателям. Кто лишен страстности, у кого уста сомкнуты, того небеса не избрали вестником их воли. О борьбе Судьбу всего сущего я вижу в борьбе. Уклониться от борьбы не может никто, если не хочет погибнуть. С тех пор, как Земля вращается вокруг солнца, пока существует холод и жара, буря и солнечный свет, до тех пор будет существовать и борьба. В том числе среди людей и народов. Если бы люди остались жить в раю, они бы сгнили. Человечество стало тем, что оно есть, благодаря борьбе.
Война — естественное и обыденное дело. Война идёт всегда и повсюду. У неё нет начала, нет конца. Война — это сама жизнь. Война — это отправная точка. Бороться я могу лишь за то, что я люблю. Любить могу лишь то, что я уважаю, а уважать лишь то, что я по крайней мере знаю.
О нации Нет такой нации, которая не могла бы возродиться. Национальное чувство ни в коем случае не является идентичным с династическим патриотизмом. Мононациональное государство в течение удивительно долгих периодов может переносить режим плохого управления, не погибая при этом. Упрочение немецкой народности предполагает уничтожение Австрии. О человеческих проявлениях Отчаянная борьба за существование, которую ты только что вел сам, зачастую убивает в тебе всякое сострадание к тем, кому выбиться в люди не удалось. Люди бывают склонны приносить жертвы лишь тогда, когда они могут действительно ждать успеха, а не тогда, когда бесцельность этих жертв очевидна. Умный человек всегда отличался от барана именно тем, что мог выслушать все, что угодно, но при этом составить свое независимое мнение.
Критика — самовыражение неудачников. Чем грандиознее ложь, тем легче ей готовы поверить. Если говорить неправду достаточно долго, достаточно громко и достаточно часто, люди начнут верить. Рядовые люди скорее верят большой лжи, нежели маленькой. Это соответствует их примитивной душе. Они знают, что в малом они и сами способны солгать, ну а уж очень сильно солгать они, пожалуй, постесняются. Большая ложь даже просто не придет им в голову.
Вот почему масса не может себе представить, чтобы и другие были способны на слишком уж чудовищную ложь, на слишком уж бессовестное извращение фактов. Кстати, цитаты про ложь О массах Народ — это бесконечное множество нолей, но стоит к ним прибавить единицу, как оно превращается в большое и значащее число. Только фанатичная толпа легко управляема. Масса больше любит властелина, чем того, кто у нее чего-либо просит. Если вы хотите завоевать любовь народных масс, говорите им самые нелепые и грубые вещи. Об экспансии Границы всех государств являются только результатом политической борьбы. Германия либо будет мировой державой, либо этой страны не будет вовсе.
История править Нацистское приветствие является вариантом так называемого « римского салюта » — приветственного жеста итальянских фашистов , позже заимствованного национал-социалистами [2]. Отличие двух салютов заключается в том, что при римском салюте рука идёт к приветственному жесту от сердца, в то время как в нацистском приветствии она идёт сразу вверх от любого положения руки [3] [4]. Гитлер приветствует марширующих штурмовиков Группа нацистских лидеров. Как официальное название часто использовался термин «немецкое приветствие». До этого оно было факультативным, и большинство военных использовало стандартное воинское приветствие , употребляя гитлеровское приветствие только в ответ на такое же обращение со стороны чинов партии или СС. Зиг хайль!
Aber nicht nur die Front fordert das, sondern auch der weitaus ьberwiegende anstдndige Teil der Heimat. Stьrmischer Beifall. Die FleiЯigen besitzen einen Anspruch darauf, dass, wenn sie zehn und zwцlf und manchmal vierzehn Stunden tдglich arbeiten, sich direkt neben ihnen nicht die Faulenzer rдkeln und gar noch die anderen fьr dumm und nicht raffiniert genug halten. Die Heimat muss in ihrer Gesamtheit sauber und intakt bleiben. Nichts darf ihr kriegsgemдЯes Bild trьben. Wir haben beispielsweise die SchlieЯung der Bars und Nachtlokale angeordnet. Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass es heute noch Menschen gibt, die ihre Kriegspflichten voll erfьllen und gleichzeitig bis tief in die Nacht in Amьsierlokalen herumsitzen. Ich muss daraus nur folgern, dass sie es mit ihren Kriegspflichten nicht allzu genau nehmen. Wir haben diese Amьsierlokale geschlossen, weil sie anfingen, uns lдstig zu fallen, und das Bild des Krieges trьbten. Wir verfolgen damit durchaus keine muckerischen Ziele.
Nach dam Kriege wollen wir gern wieder nach dem Grundsatz verfahren: Leben und leben lassen. Wдhrend des Krieges aber gilt der Grundsatz: Kдmpfen und kдmpfen lassen! Es mag sein, dass der eine oder der andere auch wдhrend des Krieges noch in der Pflege des Magens eine Hauptaufgabe sieht. Auf ihn kцnnen wir dabei keine Rьcksicht nehmen. Wenn an der Front unsere kдmpfenden Truppen vom Grenadier bis zum Generalfeldmarschall aus der Feldkьche essen, so glaube ich, ist es nicht zu viel verlangt, wenn wir in der Heimat jeden zwingen, wenigstens auf die elementarsten Gebote des Gemeinschaftsdenkens Rьcksicht zu nehmen. Feinschmecker wollen wir wieder nach dem Kriege werden. Heute haben wir Wichtigeres zu tun, als den Magen zu pflegen. Auch ungezдhlte Luxus- und Reprдsentationsgeschдfte sind mittlerweile zur Auflцsung gekommen. Sie waren fьr das kaufende Publikum vielfach ein stдndiger Stein des AnstoЯes. Zu kaufen gab es dort praktisch kaum noch etwas, hцchstens einmal, wenn man hier und da statt mit Geld, mit Butter oder mit Eiern bezahlte.
Was haben Geschдfte fьr einen Zweck, die keine Waren mehr verkaufen und nur elektrisches Licht, Heizung und menschliche Arbeitskraft verbrauchen, die uns anderswo, vor allem in der Rьstungsproduktion, an allen Ecken und Enden fehlen. Man wende hier nicht ein, die Aufrechterhaltung eines holden Friedensscheines imponiere dem Auslande. Dem Ausland imponiert nur ein deutscher Sieg! Stьrmische Zustimmung. Wenn wir gesiegt haben, wird jedermann unser Freund sein wollen. Wьrden wir aber einmal unterliegen, so kцnnten wir unsere Freunde an den Fingern einer Hand abzдhlen. Wir haben deshalb mit diesen falschen Illusionen, die das Kriegsbild verwischen, Schluss gemacht. Wir werden die Menschen, die dort untдtig in den leeren Geschдften herumstanden, einer nutzbringenderen Tдtigkeit in der цffentlichen Kriegswirtschaft zufьhren. Dieser Prozess ist eben im Gange und wird bis zum 15. Mдrz abgeschlossen sein.
Er stellt natьrlich eine riesige Umorganisation unseres ganzen wirtschaftlichen Lebens dar. Wir gehen dabei nicht planlos vor. Wir wollen auch niemanden zu Unrecht anklagen oder Tadel und Vorwurf nach allen Seiten verteilen. Wir tun lediglich das, was notwendig ist. Das aber tun wir schnell und grьndlich. Wir wollen lieber ein paar Jahre geflickte Kleider tragen, als einen Zustand heraufbeschwцren, in dem unser Volk ein paar Jahrhunderte in Lumpen herumlaufen mьsste. Was sollen heute noch Modesalons, die Licht, Heizung und menschliche Arbeitskraft verbrauchen. Sie werden nach dem Kriege, wenn wir wieder Zeit und Lust dazu haben, neu erstehen. Was sollen Frisiersalons, in denen ein Schцnheitskult gepflegt wird, der ungeheuer viel Zeit und Arbeitskraft beansprucht, der fьr den Frieden zwar sehr schцn und angenehm, fьr den Krieg aber ьberflьssig ist. Unsere Frauen und Mдdchen werden einmal unseren siegreich heimkehrenden Soldaten auch ohne friedensmдЯige Aufmachung gefallen.
In den цffentlichen Amtern wird in Zukunft etwas schneller und unbьrokratischer gearbeitet werden. Es ergibt durchaus kein gutes Bild, wenn dort nach achtstьndiger Arbeitszeit auf die Minute genau Schluss gemacht wird. Nicht das Volk ist fьr die Amter, sondern die Amter sind fьr das Volk da. Man arbeite also so lange, bis die Arbeit erledigt ist. Das ist das Gebot des Krieges. Wenn der Fьhrer das kann, so werden auch die Diener des Staates das kцnnen. Ist fьr eine lдngere Arbeitszelt nicht genьgend Arbeit da, so gibt man 10 oder 20 oder 30 Prozent der Mitarbeiter an die kriegswichtige Wirtschaft ab und stellt damit wieder eine entsprechende Anzahl Mдnner fьr die Front frei. Das gilt fьr alle Dienststellen in der Heimat. Vielleicht wird gerade dadurch auch die Arbeit in den Amtern etwas schneller und etwas weniger schwerfдllig vor sich gehen. Wir mьssen im Kriege lernen, nicht nur grьndlich, sondern auch prompt zu arbeiten.
Der Soldat an der Front hat auch nicht wochenlang Zeit, sich eine MaЯnahme zu ьberlegen, sie von Hand zu Hand weiterzugeben oder in den Akten verstauben zu lassen. Er muss sofort handeln, weil er sonst sein Leben verliert. Wir in der Heimat verlieren zwar durch schwerfдlliges Arbeiten nicht unser eigenes Leben, aber wir gefдhrden damit auf die Dauer das Leben unseres Volkes. Ьberhaupt muss jeder es sich zu einem selbstverstдndlichen Gebot der Kriegsmoral machen, auf die berechtigten Forderungen des arbeitenden und kдmpfenden Volkes die grцЯte Rьcksicht zu nehmen. Wir sind keine Spielverderber, aber wir lassen uns auch nicht das Spiel verderben. Wenn beispielsweise gewisse Mдnner und Frauen sich wochenlang in den Kurorten herumrдkeln, sich dort Gerьchte zutratschen und schwer Kriegsversehrten und Arbeitern and Arbeiterinnen, die nach einjдhrigem, hartem Einsatz Anspruch auf Urlaub haben, den Platz wegnehmen, so ist das unertrдglich und deshalb abgestellt worden. Der Krieg ist nicht die richtige Zeit fьr einen gewissen Amьsierpцbel. Unsere Freude ist bis zu seinem Ende die Arbeit und der Kampf, darin finden wir unsere tiefe innere Genugtuung. Wer das nicht aus eigenem Pflichtgefьhl versteht, der muss zu diesem Pflichtgefьhl erzogen, wenn nцtig auch gezwungen werden. Hier hilft nur hartes Durchgreifen.
Es macht z. Die Eisenbahn dient heute kriegswichtigen Transporten und kriegsnotwendigen Geschдftsreisen. Urlaub hat nur der zu beanspruchen, der sonst in seiner Arbeits- oder Kampfkraft schwer gefдhrdet wьrde. Wenn also der erste Mann im Staate seine Pflicht so ernst und so verantwortungsvoll auffasst, dann muss das fьr jeden Bьrger und jede Bьrgerin des Staates eine stumme, aber doch unьberhцrbare Aufforderung sein, sich auch danach zu richten. Die Regierung tut andererseits alles, um dem arbeitenden Volke in dieser schweren Zeit die nцtigen Entspannungsmцglichkeiten zu erhalten. Theater, Kinos, Musiksдle bleiben voll im Betrieb. Der Rundfunk wird bestrebt sein, sein Programm noch zu erweitern und zu vervollkommnen. Wir haben durchaus nicht die Absicht, ьber unser Volk eine graue Winterstimmung heraufzubeschwцren. Was dem Volke dient, was seine Kampf- und Arbeitskraft erhдlt, stдhlt und vermehrt, das ist gut und kriegswichtig. Das Gegenteil ist abzuschaffen.
Ich habe deshalb als Ausgleich gegen die eben geschilderten MaЯnahmen angeordnet, dass die geistigen und seelischen Erholungsstдtten des Volkes nicht vermindert, sondern vermehrt werden. Soweit sie unseren Kriegsanstrengungen nicht schaden, sondern sie fцrdern, mьssen sie auch von Seiten der Staats- und Volksfьhrung eine entsprechende Fцrderung erfahren. Das gilt auch fьr den Sport. Der Sport ist heute keine Angelegenheit bevorzugter Kreise, sondern eine Angelegenheit des ganzen Volkes. K-Stellungen sind auf dem Sportgebiet gдnzlich sinnlos. Der Sport hat ja die Aufgabe, die Kцrperkraft zu stдhlen, doch wohl in der Hauptsache zu dem Zweck, sie wenigstens in der schlimmsten Notzeit des Volkes zum Einsatz zu bringen. Das alles will auch die Front. Das fordert mit stьrmischer Zustimmung das ganze deutsche Volk. Es will jetzt nichts mehr hцren von kriegsunwichtiger Betriebsamkeit und дhnlichen Wichtigtuereien, die nur Zeit und Aufwand erfordern. Es will nichts mehr hцren von einem ьberspannten umstдndlichen Fragebogenunwesen fьr jeden Unsinn.
Es will sich nicht in tausend Kleinigkeiten verzetteln, die fьr den Frieden vielleicht wichtig waren, fьr den Krieg aber keine Bedeutung besitzen. Es braucht auch nicht unter dauernder Erinnerung an das schwere Opfer unserer Soldaten in Stalingrad an seine Pflicht gemahnt zu werden. Es weiЯ, was es zu tun und was es zu lassen hat. So wie der Fьhrer dem ganzen Volke ein Beispiel gibt, so muss das ganze Volk in allen seinen Schichten sich dieses Beispiel auch zum Vorbild nehmen. Wenn er nur Arbeit und Sorgen kennt, so wollen wir ihm Arbeit und Sorgen nicht allein ьberlassen, sondern den Teil, den wir ihm abnehmen kцnnen, auch auf uns nehmen. Die Zeit, die wir heute durchleben, hat in ihrer ganzen Anlage fьr jeden echten Nationalsozialisten eine verblьffende Дhnlichkeit mit der Kampzeit. Da und immer haben wir so gehandelt. Wir sind immer mit dem Volke durch dick und dьnn gegangen, und darum ist das Volk uns auch auf allen Wegen gefolgt. Wir haben immer mit dem Volke gemeinsam alle Lasten getragen, und deshalb schienen uns die Lasten nicht schwer, sondern leicht zu sein. Das Volk will gefьhrt werden.
Noch niemals gab es in der Geschichte ein Beispiel dafьr, dass in einer kritischen Stunde des nationalen Lebens das Volk einer tapferen und entschlossenen Fьhrung die Gefolgschaft versagt hдtte. Ich mцchte in diesem Zusammenhang auch ьber einige praktische MaЯnahmen des totalen Krieges, die wir bereits getroffen haben, ein paar Worte verlieren. Diesen beiden Zielen mьssen alle anderen Bedьrfnisse untergeordnet werden, selbst auf Kosten unseres sozialen Lebensniveaus wдhrend des Krieges. Das soll nicht eine endgьltige Stabilisierung unseres Lebensstandards darstellen, sondern gilt nur als Mittel zur Erreichung des Zweckes, nдmlich des eines totalen Sieges. Es mьssen im Rahmen dieser Aktion hunderttausende von U. K-Stellungen in der Heimat aufgehoben werden. Diese U. K-Stellungen waren bisher notwendig, weil wir nicht ausreichend Fach- und Schlьsselkrдfte zur Verfьgung hatten, die die durch Aufhebung der U. K-Stellungen leer werdenden Plдtze besetzen konnten. Es ist der Sinn der getroffenen und noch zu treffenden MaЯnahmen, die dafьr benцtigten Arbeitskrдfte zu mobilisieren.
Darum geht unser Appell an die noch auЯerhalb der Kriegswirtschaft stehenden Mдnner und die bisher noch auЯerhalb des Arbeitsprozesses stehenden Frauen. Sie werden sich diesem Appell nicht versagen wollen und auch nicht versagen kцnnen. Die Arbeitspflicht fьr Frauen ist sehr weitschichtig gefasst worden Das heiЯt aber nicht, dass nur diejenigen, die im Gesetz genannt worden sind, arbeiten dьrfen. Jeder ist uns willkommen, und je mehr sich fьr den groЯen Umschichtungsprozess in der inneren Wirtschaft zur Verfьgung stellen, umso mehr Soldaten kцnnen wir fьr die Front freimachen. Unsere Feinde behaupten, die deutschen Frauen seien nicht in der Lage, den Mann in der Kriegswirtschaft zu ersetzen. Das mag fьr bestimmte schwere kцrperliche Arbeiten unserer Kriegsfertigung zutreffen. Darьber hinaus aber bin ich der Ьberzeugung, dass die deutsche Frau fest entschlossen ist, den Platz, den der Mann, der an die Front geht, freimacht, in kьrzester Frist voll auszufьllen. Wir brauchen uns da gar nicht auf bolschewistische Beispiele zu berufen. Auch in der deutschen Kriegswirtschaft sind seit Jahren schon Millionen bester deutscher Frauen mit grцЯtem Erfolg tдtig, und sie warten mit Ungeduld darauf, dass ihre Reihen baldigst durch neuen Zuzug vermehrt und ergдnzt werden. Alle die, die sich fьr diese Arbeit zur Verfьgung stellen, erfьllen damit nur eine Dankespflicht der Front gegenьber.
Hunderttausende sind schon gekommen, hunderttausende werden noch kommen. In kьrzester Zeit hoffen wir damit Armeen von Arbeitskrдften freizumachen, die ihrerseits wieder Armeen von kдmpfenden Frontsoldaten freistellen werden. Ich mьsste mich sehr in den deutschen Frauen tдuschen, wenn ich annehmen sollte, dass sie den hiermit an sie ergehenden Appell ьberhцren wollten. Sie werden sich nicht in engherzigster Weise an das Gesetz anklammern oder gar noch versuchen, durch seine Maschen zu entschlьpfen. Im Ьbrigen wьrden die wenigen, die solche Absichten verfolgen, damit bei uns nicht landen. Arztliche Atteste werden statt der aufgerufenen Arbeitskraft nicht als vollwertig angenommen. Auch eine etwaige Alibi-Arbeit, die man sich beim Mann oder beim Sciiwager oder bei einem guten Bekannten verschafft, um sich unbeaufsichtigt weiter an der Arbeit vorbeidrьcken zu kцnnen, wird von uns mit entsprechenden GegenmaЯnahmen beantwortet werden. Die wenigen, die solche Plдne verfolgen, kцnnen sich damit in der цffentlichen Wertung nur selbst erledigen. Das Volk wird ihnen die grцЯte Verachtung zollen. Niemand verlangt, dass eine Frau, die dazu nicht die nцtigen kцrperlichen Voraussetzungen mitbringt, in die schwere Fertigung einer Panzerfabrik geht.
Es gibt aber eine Unmenge von Fertigungen auch in der Kriegsindustrie, die ohne allzu starke kцrperliche Anstrengung geleistet werden kцnnen und fьr die sich eine Frau, auch wenn sie aus bevorzugten Kreisen stammt, ruhig zur Verfьgung stellen kann. Niemand ist dafьr zu gut, und wir haben ja nur die Wahl, hier etwas Ganzes zu tun oder das Ganze zu verlieren. Es wдre auch angebracht, dass Frauen, die Dienstpersonal beschдftigen, jetzt schon diese Frage einer Ьberprьfung unterzцgen. Allerdings ist dann das Leben nicht mehr so gemьtlich wie im Frieden. Aber wir leben ja auch nicht im Frieden, sondern im Kriege. Gemьtlich werden wir es uns wieder machen, wenn wir den Sieg in Hдnden halten. Jetzt aber mьssen wir fьr den Sieg unter weitestgehender Aufopferung unserer Bequemlichkeit kдmpfen. Auch und gerade die Kriegerfrauen werden das verstehen. Sie werden es fьr ihre hцchste Verpflichtung halten, ihren Mдnnern drauЯen an der Front dadurch zur Seite zu treten, dass sie sich einer kriegswichtigen Arbeit zur Verfьgung stellen. Das betrifft vor allem die Landwirtschaft.
Die Frauen der Landarbeiter haben hier ein gutes Beispiel zu geben.
Август Ландмессер среди рабочих верфи не поднял руку в нацистском приветствии Преследования за отказ произносить нацистское приветствие править Нацисты требовали от жителей Германии произносить нацистское приветствие [6] [7]. Но, по мнению свидетелей Иеговы , произносить выражение «Heil Hitler! Поэтому свидетели Иеговы отказывались произносить нацистское приветствие [10] [11] [12]. Кристин Кинг и другие историки отмечают, что свидетелей Иеговы арестовывали за отказ произносить нацистское приветствие, а их детей исключали из школ и разлучали с семьями [9] [13] [14] [15].
После Второй мировой войны править После Второй мировой войны в некоторых странах нацистское приветствие и восклицания Heil Hitler! В Австрии действует аналогичный закон.
Полный текст заявления Гитлера от 22 июня 1941 года
Отличие двух салютов заключается в том, что при римском салюте рука идёт к приветственному жесту от сердца, в то время как в нацистском приветствии она идёт сразу вверх от любого положения руки [3] [4]. Гитлер приветствует марширующих штурмовиков Группа нацистских лидеров. Как официальное название часто использовался термин «немецкое приветствие». До этого оно было факультативным, и большинство военных использовало стандартное воинское приветствие , употребляя гитлеровское приветствие только в ответ на такое же обращение со стороны чинов партии или СС. Зиг хайль! Sieg Heil!
Может быть это печально, но это факт. Да по всему миру это имеет место. Германия показательный пример. Правда такова: Планета Земля даёт достаточно для того, чтобы все люди были обеспечены, влючая сыр на хлебушке, влючая мобильность, влючая возможность радостно следовать своим собственным интересам и творчески действовать везде, создавать. Это закончилось. Дно долины в 26 тысяч лет достигнуто. Рабство уменьшится, свободы прибавляется, и мы всё больше будем мирно творчески этим пользоваться. Пусть тебя не смущает, что в данный момент угрожающе трещит.
Выражение существовало в немецком языке по крайней мере с начала XX века и означало, что честь слуги состоит в верности хозяину. Гитлер передал Далюге письмо с выражением в нем благодарности. В этом письме благодарности у Гитлера было в том числе также предложение: …Эсэсовец, твоя честь называется верностью! По другой версии, фраза была произнесена Гитлером на одном из партийных собраний — после того, как подразделения берлинских СА Вальтера Штеннеса попытались штурмовать берлинское окружное правление СС и были остановлены горсткой эсэсовцев, в то время, как Йозеф Геббельс и его окружение скрылись. Значение девиза Традиционные немецкие добродетели — «честь» и «верность» или также «товарищество», «послушание» были обширно употребляемы в языке идеологии структур СС. В СС эти слова были употребимы только в адрес Адольфа Гитлера. Подобные мысли ярко выражены и в клятве эсэсовца. Я торжественно обещаю быть преданным тебе и назначенным тобой начальникам до самой смерти, да поможет мне Бог. Ich gelobe dir und den von dir bestimmten Vorgesetzten Gehorsam bis in den Tod, so wahr mir Gott helfe. Понятия «верность» и «честь» претерпели сильнейшее изменение по отношению к их традиционному значению. Понятие «честь» теряло вследствие этого своё традиционное моральное содержание. Вечная честь солдата, который по собственным моральным принципам мог отказаться от участия в военном преступлении, больше не существовала. Это было необходимо для того, чтобы получить безусловное послушание при отдаваемых командах, нарушавших законы и выходившие за моральные рамки нормального поведения солдата. Современное положение Использование данного девиза в некоторых странах является противозаконным. Закон Запрета от 1947 года. Новое в блогах Сила народа есть ни что иное, как единодушие и внутренние связи этого народа. Речь 26.
If they are incapable of fulfilling it, then their existence is harmful and they must either be reformed or removed and replaced by something better. It is absolutely necessary that this principle should be practically recognized; for that is the only way in which men can be saved from becoming the victims of a devitalized set of dogmas in a matter where dogmas are entirely out of place, and from drawing dogmatic conclusions from the consideration of ways and means, when the final purpose itself is the only valid dogma. All of you, gentlemen and members of the German Reichstag, understand the meaning of what I have just said. But on this occasion I am speaking to the whole German people and therefore I should like to bring forward a few examples which show how important these principles were proved to be when they were put into practice. There are many people for whom this is the only way of explaining why we talk of a Nationalist Socialist Revolution, though no blood was shed and no property wrecked. For a long time our ideas of law and justice had been developing in a way that led to a state of general confusion. This was partly due to the fact that we adopted ideas which were foreign to our national character and also partly because the German mind itself did not have any clear notion of what public justice meant. This confusion was evidenced more strikingly by the lack of inner clarity as to the function of law and justice. There are two extreme poles which are characteristic of this mental lack: —- 1 The opinion that the law as such is its own justification and hence cannot be made the subject of any critical analysis as to its utility, either in regard to its general principles or its relation to particular problems. According to this notion, the law would remain even though the world should disappear. Between these two extreme poles the idea of defending the larger interests of the community was introduced very timidly and under the cloak of an appeal to reasons of state. In contradistinction to all this, the National Socialist Revolution has laid down a definite and unambiguous principle on which the whole system of legislation, jurisprudence and administration of justice must be founded. It is the task of justice to collaborate in supporting and protecting the people as a whole against those individuals who, because they lack a social conscience, try to shirk the obligations to which all the members of the community are subject, or directly act against the interests of the community itself. In the new German legal system which will be in force from now onwards the nation is placed above persons and property. The principle expressed in that brief statement and everything it implies has led to the greatest reform ever introduced in our German legal structure. The first decisive action taken in accordance with the fundamental principle I have spoken of was the setting up not only of one legislator but also of one executive. The second measure is not yet ready but will be announced to the nation within a few weeks. In the German penal code, which has been drawn up with this wide general perspective in view, German justice will be placed for the first time on a basis which ensures that for all time to come its duty will be to serve in maintaining the German race. Although the chaos which we found before us in the various branches of public life was very great indeed, the state of dissolution into which German economic life had fallen was still greater. And this was the feature of the German collapse that impressed itself most strikingly on the minds of the broad masses of the people. The conditions that then actually existed have still remained in their memories and in the memory of the German people as a whole. As outstanding examples of this catastrophe we found these two phenomena: — 1 More than six millions of unemployed. The area covered by the German agricultural farms that were on the point of being sold up by forced auction was as large as the whole of Thuringia more than 8. In the natural course of events the falling off in production on the one side and the decrease in purchasing power, on the other, must necessarily bring about the disruption and annihilation of the great mass of the middle class also. How seriously this side of the German distress was then felt might subsequently be measured by the fact that I had to ask for full owners for the period of four years especially for the purpose of reducing unemployment and putting a stop to the dissolution of the German agricultural population. I may further state that in 1933 the National Socialists did not interfere with any activities which were being carried out by others and which at the same time promised success. The Party was called to take over the government of the country at a moment when the possibilities of redeeming the situation in any other way had been exhausted and particularly when repeated attempts to overcome the economic crisis had failed. After four years from that date I now face the German people and you, gentlemen and members of the Reichstag, to give an account of what has been accomplished. On this occasion I do not think you will withhold your sanction from what the National Socialist Government has done and you will agree that I have fulfilled the promises I made four years ago. It was not an easy undertaking. I am not giving away any secrets when I tell you that at that time the so-called economic experts were convinced that the economic crisis could not be overcome. In the face of this staggering situation which, as I have said, appeared hopeless to the minds of the experts, I still believed in the possibility of a German revival and particularly in the possibility of an economic recovery. My belief was grounded on two considerations: — 1 I have always had sympathy for those excited people who invariably talk of the collapse of the nation whenever they find themselves confronted with a difficult situation. What do they mean by a collapse? The German people were already in existence before they made any definite appearance in history as it is known to us. Now, leaving out entirely what their pre-historic experiences may have been, it is certain that during the past two thousand years of history, through which that portion of mankind which we call the German People has passed, unspeakable miseries and catastrophes must have befallen them more than once. Famines, wars and pestilences have overwhelmed our people and wreaked terrible havoc among them. It must give rise to unlimited faith in the vital resources of a nation when we recall the fact that only a few centuries ago our German people, with a population of more than eighteen millions, were reduced by the Thirty Years War to less than four millions. Let us also remember that this once flourishing land was pillaged, dismembered and devastated, that its cities were burned down, its hamlets and villages laid waste, that its fields were left uncultivated and barren. Some ten years afterwards our people began again to increase in number. The cities were rebuilt and began to be filled with a new life. The fields were ploughed once more. Songs were heard along the countryside, in concord with the rhythm of that work which brought new life and livelihood to the people. Let us look back over the development, or at least that part of it known to us, through which our people have passed since those dim historic ages down to the present time. We shall then recognize how puny is all the fuss that these weakling fools make who immediately begin to talk about the collapse of the economic structure—and hence of human existence—the first moment a piece of printed paper loses its face value somewhere in the world. Germany and the German people have mastered many a grave catastrophe. Of course, we must admit that the right men were always needed to formulate the necessary measures and enforce them without paying any attention to those negative persons who always think that they know more than others. A bevy of parliamentarian weaklings are certainly not the kind of men to lead a nation out of the slough of distress and despair. I firmly believed and was solemnly convinced that the economic catastrophe would be mastered in Germany as soon as the people could be got to believe in their own immortality as a people and as soon as they realized that the aim and purpose of all economic effort is to save and maintain the life of the nation. But unfortunately I have observed that the worst theorists are always busy in those quarters where theory has no place at all and where practical life counts for everything. It goes without saying that in the economic sphere and with the passing of time experience has given rise to the employment of certain definite principles and also definite methods of work which have been proved to be productive of good results. But all methods and principles are subject to the time element. To make hard-and-fast dogmas out of practical methods would deprive the human faculties and working power of that elasticity which alone enables them to face changing demands by changing the means of meeting them accordingly and thus mastering them. There were many persons among us who busied themselves, with that perseverance which is characteristic of the Germans, in an effort to formulate dogmas from economic methods and then raise that dogmatic system to a branch of our university curriculum, under the title of national economy. According to the pronouncements issued by these national economists, Germany was irrevocably lost. It is a characteristic of all dogmatists that they vigorously reject any new dogma. In other words, they criticize any new piece of knowledge that may be put forward and reject it as mere theory. For the last eigtheen [sic] years we have been witnessing a rare spectacle. Our economic dogmatists have been proved wrong in almost every branch of practical life and yet they repudiate those who have actually overcome the economic crisis, as propagators of false theories and damn them accordingly. You all know the story of the doctor who told a patient that he could live only for another six months. Ten years afterwards the patient met the physician; but the only surprise which the latter expressed at the recovery of the patient was to state that the treatment which the second doctor gave the patient was entirely wrong. The German economic policy which National Socialism introduced in 1933 is based on some fundamental considerations. In the relations between economics and the people, the people alone is the only unchangeable element. Economic activity in itself is no dogma and never can be such. There is no economic theory or opinion which can claim to be considered as sacrosanct. The will to place the economic system at the service of the people, and capital at the service of economics, is the only thing that is of decisive importance here. We know that National Socialism vigorously combats the opinion which holds that the economic structure exists for the benefit of capital and that the people are to be looked upon as subject to the economic system. We were therefore determined from the very beginning to exterminate the false notion that the economic system could exist and operate entirely freely and entirely outside of any control or supervision on the part of the State. Today there can no longer be such a thing as an independent economic system. That is to say, the economic system can no longer be left to itself exclusively. And this is so, not only because it is unallowable from the political point of view but also because, in the purely economic sphere itself, the consequences would be disastrous. It is out of the question that millions of individuals should be allowed to work just as they like and merely to meet their own needs; but it is just as impossible to allow the entire system of economics to function according to the notions held exclusively in economic circles and thus made to serve egotistic interests. Then there is the further consideration that these economic circles are not in a position to bear the responsibility for their own failures. In its modern phase of the development, the economic system concentrates enormous masses of workers in certain special branches and in definite local areas. New inventions or a slump in the market may destroy whole branches of industry at one blow. The industrialist may close his factory gates. He may even try to find a new field for his personal activities. In most cases he will not be ruined so easily. Moreover, the industrialists who have to suffer in such contingencies are only a small number if individuals. But on the other side there are hundreds of thousands of workers, with their wives and children. Who is to defend their interests and care for them? The whole community of the people? Indeed, it is its duty to do so. Therefore the whole community cannot be made to bear the burden of economic disasters without according it the right of influencing and controlling economic life and thus avoiding catastrophes. It was exclusively a problem of how industrial lab our could best be employed on the one side and, on the other, how our agricultural resources could be utilized. This is first and foremost a problem of organization. Phrases, such as the freedom of the economic system, for example, are no help. What we have to do is use all available means at hand to make production possible and open up fields of activity for our working energies. If this can be successfully done by the economic leaders themselves, that is to say by the industrialists, then we are content. But if they fail the folk-community, which in this case means the State, is obliged to step in for the purpose of seeing that the working energies of the nation are employed in such a way that what they produce will be of use to the nation, and the State will have to devise the necessary measures to assure this. In this respect the State may do everything; but one thing it cannot do—-and this was the actual state of affairs we had to face—-is to allow 12. For the folk-community does not exist on the fictitious value of money but on the results of productive labor, which is what gives money its value. This production, and not a bank or gold reserve, is the first cover for a currency. And if I increase production I increase the real income of my fellow-citizens. And if I reduce production I reduce that income, no matter what wages are paid out. Members of the Reichstag: Within the past four years we have increased German production to an extraordinary degree in all branches. And the whole German nation benefits by this increase. For it there is a demand today for very many million tons of coal more than formerly, this is not for the purpose of superheating the houses of a few millionaires to a couple of thousand degrees, but rather because millions of our German countrymen are thus enabled to purchase more coal for themselves with their increased income. By giving employment to millions of German workers who had hitherto been idle, the National Socialist Revolution has brought about such a gigantic increase in German production. That rise in our total national income guarantees the market value of the goods produced. And only in such cases where we could not increase this production, owing to certain conditions that were beyond our control, there have been shortages from time to time; but these bear no proportion whatsoever to the general success of the National Socialist struggle. The four-year plan is the most striking manifestation of the systematic way in which our economic life is being conducted. In particular this plan will provide permanent employment in the internal circulation of our economic life for those masses of German lab our that are now being released from the armament industry. One sign of the gigantic economic development which has taken place is that in many industries today it is quite difficult to find sufficient skilled workmen. I am thankful that this is so; because it will help to place the importance of the worker as a man and as a working force in its proper light; and also because in doing so—though there are other motives also—we have a chance of making the activities of the party and its unions better understood and thus securing stronger and more willing support. Seeing that we insist on the national importance of the function which our economic system fulfils, it naturally follows that the former disunion between employer and employee can no longer exist. But the new State will not and does not wish to assume the role of entrepreneur. It will regulate the working strength of the nation only in so far as such regulation is necessary for the common good. And it will supervise conditions and methods of working only in so far as this is in the interests of all those engaged in work. Under no circumstances will the State attempt to bureaucratize economic life. The economic effects that follow from every real and practical initiative benefit the people as a whole. At the present moment an inventor or an economic organizer is of inestimable value to the folk community. For the future the first task of National Socialist education will be to make clear to all our fellow-citizens how their reciprocal worth must be appreciated. We must point out to the one side how there can be no substitute for the German worker and we must teach the German worker how indispensable are the inventor and the genuine business leader. It is quite clear that under the aegis of such an outlook on economic life, strikes and lock-outs can no longer be tolerated. The National Socialists State repudiates the right of economic coercion. Above all contracting parties stand the economic interests of the nation, which are the interests of the people. The practical results of this economic policy of ours are already known to you. Throughout the whole nation there is a tremendous urge towards productive activity. Enormous works are arising everywhere for the expansion of industry and traffic. While in other countries strikes or lock-outs shatter the stability of national production, our millions of productive workers obey the highest of all laws that we have in this world, namely the law of common sense. Within these four years which have passed we have succeeded in bringing about the economic redemption of our people; but we realize at the same time that the results of this economic work in town and city must be safeguarded. The first danger that threatens us here is in the sphere of cultural creativeness. And that danger comes from those who are themselves active in that sphere. For our fellow-countrymen who are engaged in artistic and cultural productivity today, or are acting as custodians and trustees of cultural works, have not the necessary intuitive faculties to value and appreciate the ideal products of human genius in this sphere. The National Socialist Movement has laid down the directive lines along which the State must conduct the education of the people. This education does not begin at a certain year and end at another. The development of the human being makes it necessary to take the child from the control of that small cell of social life which is the family and entrust his further training to the community itself. The National Socialist Revolution has clearly outlined the duties which this social education must fulfil and, above all, it has made this education independent of the question of age. In other words, the education of the individual can never end. Therefore it is the duty of the folk-community to see that this education and higher training must always be along lines that help the community to fulfil its own task, which is the maintenance of the race and nation. For that reason we must insist that all organs of education which may be useful for the instruction and training of the people have to fulfil their duty towards the community. Such organs or organizations are: Education of the Youth, Young Peoples Organization, Hitler Youth, Lab our Front, Party and Army—all these are institutions for the education and higher training of our people. The book press and the newspaper press, lectures and art, the theatre and the cinema, they are all organs of popular education. What the National Socialist Revolution has accomplished in this sphere is astounding. Think only of the following: — The whole body of our German education, including the press, the theatre, the cinema and literature, is being controlled and shaped today by men and women of our own race.
Bevor Adolf Hitler berühmt wurde... (Teil 1)
- Adolf Hitler: Rede vor dem Reichstag am 1. September 1939
- служба утерянных цитат - 9
- Смотрим вместе, и я даю свой лексический и грамматический комментарий
- Текст и перевод песни Ernst Busch - Alle Waffen gegen Hitler
- Цитаты гитлера на немецком с переводом. Немецкие крылатые выражения в русском языке
- Цитаты адольфа гитлера на немецком с переводом - Научные работы на
Обращение Адольфа Гитлера к германскому народу 22 июня 1941
Against this attempt we have waged a bitter struggle, not only in defence of our own civilization but in defence of European civilization as a whole. In January and February of the year 1933, when the last decisive struggle against this barbarism was being fought out in Germany, had Germany been defeated in that struggle and had the Bolshevic field of destruction and death extended over Central Europe, then perhaps a different opinion would have arisen on the banks of the Thames as to the nature of this terrible menace to humanity. For since it is said that England must be defended on the frontier of the Rhine she would then have found herself in close contact with that harmless democratic world of Moscow, whose innocence they are always trying to impress upon us. Here I should like to state the following once again: — The teaching of Bolshevism is that there must be a world revolution, which would mean world-destruction. If such a doctrine were accepted and given equal rights with other teachings in Europe, this would mean that Europe would be delivered over to it. As far as Germany itself is concerned, let there be no doubts on the following points: — 1 We look on Bolshevism as a world peril for which there must be no toleration. It is in accordance with this attitude of ours that we should avoid close contact with the carriers of these poisonous bacilli.
And that is also the reason why we do not want to have any closer relations with them beyond the necessary political and commercial relations; for if we went beyond these we might thereby run the risk of closing the eyes of our people to the danger itself. I consider Bolshevism the most malignant poison that can be given to a people. And therefore I do not want my own people to come into contact with this teaching. As a citizen of this nation I myself shall not do what I should have to condemn my fellow-citizens for doing. I demand from every German workman that he shall not have any relations with these international mischief-makers and he shall never see me clinking glasses or rubbing shoulders with them. Moreover, any further treaty connections with the present Bolshevic Russia would be completely worthless for us.
It is out of the question to think that National Socialist Germany should ever be bound to protect Bolshevism or that we, on our side, should ever agree to accept the assistance of a Bolshevic State. For I fear that the moment any nation should agree to accept such assistance, it would thereby seal its own doom. I must also say here that I do not accept the opinion which holds that in the moment of peril the League of nations could come to the rescue of the member States and hold them up by the arms, as it were. Eden stated in his last address that deeds and not speeches are what matters. On that point I should like to call attention to the fact that up to now the outstanding feature of the League of Nations has been talk rather than action. There was one exception and in that case it would probably have been better to have been content with talk.
In this one case, as might have been foreseen, action was fruitless. Hence, just as I have been forced by economic circumstances to depend on our own resources principally for the maintenance of my people, so also I have been forced in the political sphere. And we ourselves are not to blame for that. Three times I have made concrete offers for armament restriction or at least armament limitation. These offers were rejected. In this connection I may recall the fact that the greatest offer which I then made was that Germany and France together should reduce their standing armies to 300,000 men; that Germany, Great Britain and France, should bring down their air force to parity and that Germany and Great Britain should conclude a naval agreement.
Only the last offer was accepted and it was the only contribution in the world to a real limitation of armaments. The other German proposals were either flatly refused or were answered by the conclusion of those alliances which gave Central Europe to Soviet Russia as the field of play for its gigantic forces. Eden speaks of German armaments and expects a limitation of these armaments. We ourselves proposed this limitation long ago. But it had no effect because, instead of accepting our proposal, treaties were made whereby the greatest military power in the world was, according to the terms of the treaties and in fact, introduced into Central Europe. In speaking of armaments it would be well to mention in the first instance the armaments possessed by that Power which sets the standard for the armaments of all others.
Eden believes that in the future all States should possess only the armament which is necessary for their de fence. I do not know whether and how far Mr. Eden has sounded Moscow on the question of carrying that excellent idea into effect, and I do not know what assurances they have given from that quarter. I think however that I ought to put forward one point in this connection. Each nation has the right to judge this for itself, and it alone has the right. If therefore Great Britain today decides for herself on the extent of her armaments everybody in Germany will understand her action; for we can only think of London alone as being competent to decide on what is necessary for the protection of the British Empire.
On the other hand I should like to insist that the estimate of our protective needs, and thus of the armament that is necessary for the de fence of our people, is within our own competency and can be decided only in Berlin. I believe that the general recognition of these principles will not render conditions more difficult but will help to release tension. Anyhow Germany is pleased at having found friends in Italy and Japan who hold the same views as ourselves and we should be still more pleased if these convictions were widespread in Europe. Therefore nobody welcomed more cordially than we did the manifest lessening of tension in the Mediterranean, brought about by the Anglo-Italian agreement. We believe that this will first of all lead to an understanding which may put a stop to, or at least limit, the catastrophe from which poor Spain is suffering. Germany has no interests in that country except the care of those commercial relations which Mr.
Eden himself declares to be so important and useful. Our sympathies with General Franco and his Government are in the first place of a general nature and, secondly, they arise from a hope that the consolidation of a real National Spain may lead to a strengthening of economic possibilities in Europe. We are ready to do everything which in any way may contribute towards the restoration of order in Spain. But I think that the following considerations should not be left out of account: — During the last hundred years a number of new nations have been created in Europe which formerly, because of their disunion and weakness, were of only small economic importance and of no political importance at all. Through the establishment of these new States new tensions have naturally arisen. True statesmanship however must face realities and not shirk them.
The Italian nation and the new Italian State are realities. The German nation and the German Reich are likewise realities. And for my my own fellow citizens I should like to state that the Polish nation and the Polish State have also become realities. Also in the Balkans nations have reawakened and have built their own States. The people who belong to those States want to live and they will live. The unreasonable division of the world into nations that have and nations that have not will not remove or solve that problem, no more than the internal social problems of the nations can be simply solved through more or less clever phrases.
For thousands of years the nations asserted their vital claims by the use of power. If in our time some other institution is to take the place of this power for the purpose or regulating relations between the peoples, then it must take account of natural vital claims and decide accordingly. It is the task of the League of Nations only to guarantee the existing state of the world and to safeguard it for all time, then we might just as well entrust it with the task of regulating the ebb and flow of the tides or directing the Gulf Stream into a definite course for the future. But the League of Nations will not be able to do the one or the other. The continuance of its existence will in the long run depend on the extent to which it realize that the necessary reforms which concern international relations must be carefully considered and put into practice. The German people once built up a colonial Empire without robbing anyone and without violating any treaty.
And they did so without any war. That colonial Empire was taken away from us. And the grounds on which it was sought to excuse this act are not tenable. First: It was said that the natives did not want to belong to Germany. Who asked them if they wished to belong to some other Power? And when were these natives ever asked if they had been contented with the Power that formerly ruled them?
Second: It is stated that the colonies were not administered properly by the Germans. Now, Germany had these colonies only for a few decades. Great sacrifices were made in building them up and they were in a process of development which would have led to quite different results than in 1914. But anyhow the colonies had been so developed by us that other people considered it worth while to engage in a sanguinary struggle for the purpose of taking them from us. Third: It is said that they are of no real value. If that is the case then they can be of no value to other States also.
And so it is difficult to see why they keep them. Moreover, Germany has never demanded colonies for military purposes, but exclusively for economic purposes. It is obvious that in times of general prosperity the value of certain territories may decrease, but it is just as evident that in times of distress such value increases. Today Germany lives in a time of difficult struggle for foodstuffs and raw materials. Sufficient imports are conceivable only if there be a continued and lasting increase in our exports. Therefore, as a matter of course, our demand for colonies for our densely populated country will be put forward again and again.
In concluding my remarks on this subject I should like to note a few points concerning the possible ways which may lead to a general pacification of Europe, which might also be extended outside Europe. They are the most important conditions for lasting and solid economic and political relations between the peoples. A few weeks ago we saw how an organized band of international war mongers spread a mass of lies which almost succeeded in raising mistrust between two nations and might easily have led to worse consequences than actually followed. I greatly regret that the British Foreign Secretary did not categorically state that there was not one word of truth in those calumnies about Morocco which had been spread by these international war mongers. Thanks to the loyalty of a foreign diplomat and his Government, it was possible to clear up this extraordinary situation immediately. Supposing another case arose in which it turned out impossible to establish the truth so readily, what then would happen?
Germany is hoping to have close and friendly relations with Italy. May we succeed in paving the way for such relations with other European countries. The German Reich will watch over its security and honor with its strong army. On the other hand, convinced that there can be no greater treasure for Europe than peace, it will always be a reasonable supporter of those European ideals of peace and will be always conscious of its responsibilities. This would lead to a decisive lessening of tension between the nations who are forced to live side by side, and whose State frontiers are not identical with the ethnical frontiers. In concluding these remarks I should like to deal with the document which the British Government addressed to the German Government on the occasion of the occupation of the Rhineland.
I should like first to state that we believe and are convinced that the British Government at that time did everything to avoid an increase of tension in the European crisis, and that the document in question owes its origin entirely to the desire to make a contribution towards disentangling the situation of those days. Nevertheless, it was not possible for the German Government, for reasons which the Government of Great Britain will appreciate, to reply to those questions. We preferred to settle some of those questions in the most natural way by the practical building up of our relations with our neighbors. I believe that this statement will be understood by all. Moreover, with all my heart I hope that the intelligence and goodwill of responsible European Governments will succeed, despite all opposition, in preserving peace for Europe. Peace is our dearest treasure.
Whatever contributions Germany can make towards preserving it, these she will make. Before concluding my address today I should like to give a short sketch of the tasks that lie ahead of us. In the carrying out of the Four Years Plan lies our first task. It will call for gigantic efforts but eventually it will turn out a great blessing for our people. Its purpose is to strengthen our national economic system in all its branches. The execution of it is guaranteed.
All those great works which have been started apart from this plan will be continued. Their purpose is to promote the health of the nation and make life more pleasant. Building extensions will be systematically carried out in some of our large cities, as an externalization of the spirit that actuates this great plan. And that order will be based on such spacious plans as will be worthy of the National Socialist Movement and also of the German metropolis. We have allotted a period of twenty years for the carrying out of this plan. May the Almighty God grant us a time of peace in which to bring this gigantic work to completion.
But this work will only be the counterpart of a general cultural development which we wish to see taking place in Germany, as the crowning achievement to the restoration of our internal and external freedom. And, finally, it will be one of our future tasks to give the German people a Constitution which will be in harmony with the real life of our people, as that life has developed politically. This Constitution will place its seal on this life for all time to come and will be an imperishable and fundamental law for all Germans. As I look back on the great work that has been done during the past four years you will understand quite well that my first feeling is simply one of thankfulness to our Almighty God for having allowed me to bring this work to success. He has blessed our lab ours and has enabled our people to come through all the obstacles which encompassed them on their way. I have had three extraordinary friends in my life.
In my youth it was Poverty, which was my companion for many years. When the Great War came to a close it was the profound anguish that I felt over the downfall of our people. This anguish seized me and determined the path I had to follow. Since January 30th. From that time this anxiety has never left my side and will probably remain a faithful companion until the end of my days. But how could a man bear the burden of this anxiety were it not for the faith he has in his mission and which enables him to trust that He who is above us all sanctions my work.
Destiny has often decreed that men who have a special mission to fulfil must be lonely and deserted. But here I wish to return thanks to Providence for having given me a group of faithful comrades who linked their lives with mine and have ever since fought at my side for the resurrection of our people. It is a great happiness for me that I did not have to walk among the German people as a man alone, but that at my side there was always a group of men whose names will endure in the history of Germany. At this point I wish to thank my old fighting comrades who have stood by my side throughout all these years and who give me their help today either as Cabinet Ministers, Reichsstatthalter, Gauleiter, or in other positions under the Party or the State. During these days a tragedy is being enacted in Moscow which shows how highly we ought to value that loyalty which binds the leaders of a nation to one another. I further wish to express my sincere gratitude to all those who did not belong to the ranks of the Party but who in these recent years have been loyal assistants and comrades in governmental work and in other work for the nation.
All of them belong to us, even though they may not wear the external insignia of our party community. I thank all those men and women who have assisted in building up our party organizations and working in them with success. But above all I have to thank the chiefs of our armed forces. They have enabled us to provide the National Socialist State with a National Socialist defence force, without placing any difficulties whatsoever in the way. Thus the Party and the defence forces are now the guarantors sworn to devote themselves to the preservation of our national existence. But we know that all our efforts would have been in vain if we did not have the loyal cooperation of hundreds of thousands of political leaders, innumerable officials and countless soldiers and officers, who did their work under the inspiration of the ideal of our national resurgence.
And above all we must acknowledge that our success could not have been attained if we were not backed up by the united front of the whole people. On this historic occasion I must once again thank all those millions of unknown Germans, from every class and caste, profession and trade and from all the farmsteads, who have given their hearts, their lives and their sacrifices, for the new Reich. And all of us, gentlemen and members of the Reichstag, hereby join together in tendering our thanks to the women of Germany, to the millions of those German mothers who have given their children to the Third Reich.
Экспансионистская политика Гитлера стала одной из главных причин начала Второй мировой войны в Европе. С его именем связаны многочисленные преступления против человечества, совершённые нацистским режимом как в самой Германии, так и на оккупированных ею территориях, включая Холокост. Международный военный трибунал признал преступными созданные Гитлером организации и само руководство нацистской партии. Дорогие друзья - благодарю Вас за просмотр.
Only in those cases where the murderous lust of the Bolsheviks, even after the 30th of January, 1933, led them to think that by the use of brute force they could prevent the success and realization of the National Socialist ideal—only then did we answer violence with violence, and naturally we did it promptly. Certain other individuals of a naturally undisciplined temperament, and who had no political consciousness whatsoever, had to be taken into protective custody; but, generally speaking, these individuals were given their freedom after a short period. Beyond this there was a small number who took part in politics only for the purpose of establishing an alibi for their criminal activities, which were proved by the numerous sentences to prison and penal servitude that had been passed upon them previously. We prevented such individuals from pursuing their destructive careers, inasmuch as we set them to do some useful work, probably for the first time in their lives. I do not know if there ever has been a resolution which was of such a profound character as the National Socialist Revolution and which at the same time allowed innumerable persons who had been prominent in political circles under the former regime to follow their respective callings in private life peacefully and without causing them any worry. Not only that, but even many among our bitterest enemies, some of whom had occupied the highest positions in the government, were allowed to enjoy their regular emoluments and pensions. That is what we did. But this policy did not always help our reputation abroad. If the revolution in Germany had taken place according to the democratic model in Spain these strange apostles of non-intervention abroad would probably find that there was nothing which they need to worry about. People closely acquainted with the state of affairs in Spain have assured us that if we place the number of persons who have been slaughtered in this bestial way at 170. Measured by the achievements of the noble democratic revolutionaries in Spain, the quota of human beings allotted for slaughter to the National Socialist Revolution would have been about 400. That we did not carry out this mass-slaughter is apparently looked on as a piece of negligence on our part. We see that the democratic world-citizens are by no means gracious in their criticism of this leniency. We certainly had the power in our hands to do what has been done in Spain. And probably we had better nerves than the murderer who steals upon his victim unawares, shunning the open fight, and who is capable only of murdering defenseless [sic] hostages. We have been soldiers and we never flinched in the face of battle throughout that most gruesome war of all times. Our hearts and, I may also add, our sound common sense saved us from committing any acts like those which have been done in Spain. Taking it all in all, fewer lives were sacrificed in the National Socialist Revolution than the number of National Socialist followers who were murdered in Germany by our Bolshevik opponents in the year 1932 alone, when there was no revolution. This absence of bloodshed and destruction was made possible solely because we had adopted a principle which not only guided our conduct in the past but which we shall also never forget in the future. This principle was that the purpose of a revolution, or of any general change in the condition of public affairs, cannot be to produce chaos but only to replace what is bad by substituting something better. In such cases, however, something better must be ready at hand. On the 30th. All the means employed in carrying on that struggle were strictly within the law as it then stood and the protagonists in the fight were the National Socialists. Before the new State could be actually established and promulgated, the idea of it and the model for its organization had already existed within the framework of our party. All the fundamental principles on which the new Reich was to be constructed were the principles and ideas already embodied in the National Socialist Party. As a result of the constitutional struggle to win over our German fellow-countrymen to our side the party had established its predominance in the Reichstag and for a whole year before it actually assumed power it already had the right to demand this power for itself, even according to the principles of the parliamentary-democratic system. But it was essential for the National Socialist Revolution that this party should put forward demands which of themselves would involve a real revolutionary change in the principles and institutions of government hitherto in force. When certain individuals who were blind to the actual state of affairs thought that they could refuse to submit to the practical application of the principles of the movement which had been entrusted with the government of the Reich, then, but not until then, the party used an iron hand to make these illegal disturbers of the peace bend their stubborn necks before the laws of the new National Socialist Reich and Government. With this act the National Socialist Revolution came to an end. For as soon as the party had taken over power, and this new condition of affairs was consolidated, I looked upon it as a matter of course that the Revolution should be transformed into an evolution. The new development which now set in, however, meant that there had to be a new orientation not merely of our ideas but also in regard to the practical policy which we had to carry out. Even today certain individuals who have fallen in the march of events refuse to adapt themselves to this change. They cannot understand it because it is beyond their mental horizon or outside the sphere of their egotistic interests. Our National Socialist teaching has undoubtedly a revolutionizing effect in many spheres of life and has interfered and acted under the revolutionary impulse. The main plank in the National Socialist program is to abolish the liberalistic concept of the individual and the Marxist concept of humanity and to substitute therefore the folk community, rooted in the soil and bound together by the bond of its common blood. A very simple statement; but it involves a principle that has tremendous consequences. This is probably the first time and this is the first country in which people are being taught to realize that, of all the tasks which we have to face, the noblest and most sacred for mankind is that each racial species must preserve the purity of the blood which God has given it. And thus it happens that for the first time it is now possible for men to use their God-given faculties of perception and insight in the understanding of those problems which are of more momentous importance for the preservation of human existence than all the victories that may be won on the battlefield or the successes that may be obtained through economic efforts. It is not for men to discuss the question of why Providence created different races, but rather to recognize the fact that it punishes those who disregard its work of creation. Unspeakable suffering and misery have come upon mankind because they lost this instinct which was grounded in a profound intuition; and this loss was caused by a wrong and lopsided education of the intellect. Among our people there are millions and millions of persons living today for whom this law has become clear and intelligible. What individual seers and the still unspoiled natures of our forefathers saw by direct perception has now become a subject of scientific research in Germany. And I can prophesy here that, just as the knowledge that the earth moves around the sun led to a revolutionary alternation in the general world-picture, so the blood-and-race doctrine of the National Socialist Movement will bring about a revolutionary change in our knowledge and therewith a radical reconstruction of the picture which human history gives us of the past and will also change the course of that history in the future. And this will not lead to an estrangement between the nations; but, on the contrary, it will bring about for the first time a real understanding of one another. At the same time, however, it will prevent the Jewish people from intruding themselves among all the other nations as elements of internal disruption, under the mask of honest world-citizens, and thus gaining power over these nations. We feel convinced that the consequences of this really revolutionizing vision of truth will bring about a radical transformation in German life. For the first time in our history, The German people have found the way to a higher unity than they ever had before; and that is due to the compelling attraction of this inner feeling. Innumerable prejudices have been broken down, many barriers have been overthrown as unreasonable, evil traditions have been wiped out and antiquated symbols shown to be meaningless. From that chaos of disunion which had been caused by tribal, dynastic, philosophical, religious and political strife, the German nation has arisen and has unfurled the banner of a reunion which symbolically announces, not a political triumph, but the triumph of the racial principle. For the past four-and-a-half years German legislation has upheld and enforced this idea. Just as on January 30th, 1933, a state of affairs already in existence was legalized by the fact that I was entrusted with the chancellorship, whereby the party whose supremacy in Germany had then become unquestionable was not authorized to take over the government of the Reich and mould the future destiny of Germany; so this German legislation that has been in force for the past four years was only the legal sanction which gave jurisdiction and binding force to an idea that had already been clearly formulated and promulgated by the party. When the German community, based on the racial blood-bond, became realized in the German State we all felt that this would remain one of the finest moments to be remembered during our lives. Like a blast of springtime it passed over Germany four years ago. The fighting forces of our movement who for many years had defended the banner of the Hooked Cross against the superior forces of the enemy, and had carried it steadily forward for a long fourteen years, now planted it firmly in the soil of the new Reich. Within a few weeks the political debris and the social prejudices which had been accumulating through a thousand years of German history were removed and cleared away. May we not speak of a revolution when the chaotic conditions brought about by parliamentary-democracy disappear in less than three months and a regime of order and discipline takes their place, and a new energy springs forth from a firmly welded unity and a comprehensive authoritative power such as Germany never before had? So great was the Revolution that its intellectual foundations are not even yet understood but are superficially criticized by our contemporaries. They talk of democracies and dictatorships; but they fail to grasp the fact that in this country a radical transformation has taken place and has produced results which are democratic in the highest sense of the word, if democracy has any meaning at all. With infallible certainty we are steering towards an order of things in which a process of selection will become active in the political leadership of the nation, as it exists throughout the whole of life in general. By this process of selection, which will follow the laws of Nature and the dictates of human reason, those among our people who show the greatest natural ability will be appointed to positions in the political leadership of the nation. In making this selection no consideration will be given to birth or ancestry, name or wealth, but only to the question of whether or not the candidate has a natural vocation for those higher positions of leadership. In this country that principle will have its political counterpart. Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid. And that is no theory. In the present National Socialist Germany it is a reality that is considered by us all as a matter of course. I myself, to whom the people have given their trust and who have been called to be their leader, come from the people. All the millions of German workers know that it is not a foreign dilettante or an international revolutionary apostle who is at the head of the Reich, but a German who has come from their own ranks. And numerous people whose families belong to the peasantry and working classes are now filling prominent positions in this National Socialist State. Some of them actually hold the highest offices in the leadership of the nation, as Cabinet Ministers, Reichsstatthalter and Gauleiter. But National Socialism always bears in mind the interests of the people as a whole and not the interests of one class or another. The National Socialist Revolution has not aimed at turning a privileged class into a class which will have no rights in the future. Its aim has been to grant equal rights to those social strata that hitherto were denied such rights. We have not ruined millions of citizens by degrading them to the level of enslaved workers. Our aim has been to educate slaves to be German citizens. One thing will certainly be quite clear to every German; and this is that revolutions as acts of terror can only be of short duration. If revolutions are not able to produce something new they will end up by devouring the whole of the national patrimony which existed before them. From the assumption of power as an act of force the beneficial work of peace must be promptly developed. But those who abolish classes for the purpose of putting new classes in their place sow the seeds of new revolutions. The bourgeois citizen who has the ruling power in his hands today will become a proletarian if he is banished to Siberia tomorrow and condemned to enforced lab our there. He will then yearn for hisday of deliverance, just as did the proletarian of former times, who now thinks that his turn has come to play the despot. Therefore the National Socialist Revolution never aimed at bringing in one class of the German people and turning out another. One the contrary, our objective has been to make it possible for the whole German people to work, not only in the economic but also in the political field, and to guarantee this possibility by organizing the various classes into one national unit. The National Socialist Movement, however, limits its sphere of internal activity to those individuals who belong to one people and it refuses to allow the members of a foreign race to wield an influence over our political, intellectual, or cultural life. And we refuse to accord to the members of a foreign race any predominant position in our national economic system. In this folk-community, which is based on the bond of blood, and in the results which National Socialism has obtained by making the idea of this community understood among the public, lies the most profound reason for the marvelous success of our Revolution. Confronted with this new and vigorous ideal, all idols and relics of the past which had been upheld by dynastic interests, tribal affiliations and even party interests, now began to lose their glamour. That is why the whole party system of former times completely collapsed in a few weeks, without giving rise to the feeling that something had been lost. They were superseded by a better ideal. A new movement took their place. A reorganization of our people into a national unit that includes all those whose lab our is productive simply pushed aside the old organizations of employers and employees. The symbolic emblems of the recent past, which was a period of disintegration and disability, were banished, not—as in 1918 or 1919—through a resolution voted by a committee appointed to invent a new symbol for the Reich, as if the choice were to depend on the results of a prize competition. Since that day it has become the consecrated symbol of his national resurgence on land and sea and in the air. There could be no more eloquent proof of how profoundly the German people have understood the significance of this change and new development than the manner in which the nation sanctioned our regime at the polls on so many occasions during the years that followed. So, of all those who like to point again and again to the democratic form of government as the institution which is based on the universal will of the people, in contrast to dictatorships, nobody has a better right to speak in the name of the people than I have. Among the results of this phase of the German Revolution I may enumerate the following: — 1 Since that time there is only one trustee of supreme power among the German people and that trustee is the whole people itself. Anyone who compares this state of affairs with the condition of Germany before January 1933 will realize what a tremendous transformation is indicated by these few short statements. But this transformation is only a result that has followed from carrying a fundamental axiom of the National Socialist doctrine into practical effect. This axiom is that the only reasonable meaning and purpose of all human thought and conduct cannot be to create or to maintain structures, organizations or functions made by men, but only to preserve and develop the innate character of the people itself; for Providence has given us this character as the groundwork of all our constructive efforts. Through the successful issue of the National Socialist Movement the people as such was placed above any organization, construction or function, as the sole element that is always there and will permanently abide. The meaning and purpose which Providence had in mind when it created the different races cannot be investigated by us, human beings, and no theory about it can be laid down. But the meaning and purpose of human organizations and of all human activities can be measured by asking what value they are for the maintenance of the race or people, which is the one existing element that must abide. The people—the race—is the primary thing. Party, State, Army, the national economic structure, Justice etc, all these are only secondary and accidental. They are only the means to the end and the end is the preservation of this nation. These public institutions are right and useful according to the measure in which their energies are directed towards this task. If they are incapable of fulfilling it, then their existence is harmful and they must either be reformed or removed and replaced by something better. It is absolutely necessary that this principle should be practically recognized; for that is the only way in which men can be saved from becoming the victims of a devitalized set of dogmas in a matter where dogmas are entirely out of place, and from drawing dogmatic conclusions from the consideration of ways and means, when the final purpose itself is the only valid dogma. All of you, gentlemen and members of the German Reichstag, understand the meaning of what I have just said. But on this occasion I am speaking to the whole German people and therefore I should like to bring forward a few examples which show how important these principles were proved to be when they were put into practice. There are many people for whom this is the only way of explaining why we talk of a Nationalist Socialist Revolution, though no blood was shed and no property wrecked. For a long time our ideas of law and justice had been developing in a way that led to a state of general confusion. This was partly due to the fact that we adopted ideas which were foreign to our national character and also partly because the German mind itself did not have any clear notion of what public justice meant. This confusion was evidenced more strikingly by the lack of inner clarity as to the function of law and justice. There are two extreme poles which are characteristic of this mental lack: —- 1 The opinion that the law as such is its own justification and hence cannot be made the subject of any critical analysis as to its utility, either in regard to its general principles or its relation to particular problems. According to this notion, the law would remain even though the world should disappear. Between these two extreme poles the idea of defending the larger interests of the community was introduced very timidly and under the cloak of an appeal to reasons of state. In contradistinction to all this, the National Socialist Revolution has laid down a definite and unambiguous principle on which the whole system of legislation, jurisprudence and administration of justice must be founded. It is the task of justice to collaborate in supporting and protecting the people as a whole against those individuals who, because they lack a social conscience, try to shirk the obligations to which all the members of the community are subject, or directly act against the interests of the community itself. In the new German legal system which will be in force from now onwards the nation is placed above persons and property. The principle expressed in that brief statement and everything it implies has led to the greatest reform ever introduced in our German legal structure. The first decisive action taken in accordance with the fundamental principle I have spoken of was the setting up not only of one legislator but also of one executive. The second measure is not yet ready but will be announced to the nation within a few weeks. In the German penal code, which has been drawn up with this wide general perspective in view, German justice will be placed for the first time on a basis which ensures that for all time to come its duty will be to serve in maintaining the German race. Although the chaos which we found before us in the various branches of public life was very great indeed, the state of dissolution into which German economic life had fallen was still greater. And this was the feature of the German collapse that impressed itself most strikingly on the minds of the broad masses of the people. The conditions that then actually existed have still remained in their memories and in the memory of the German people as a whole. As outstanding examples of this catastrophe we found these two phenomena: — 1 More than six millions of unemployed. The area covered by the German agricultural farms that were on the point of being sold up by forced auction was as large as the whole of Thuringia more than 8. In the natural course of events the falling off in production on the one side and the decrease in purchasing power, on the other, must necessarily bring about the disruption and annihilation of the great mass of the middle class also. How seriously this side of the German distress was then felt might subsequently be measured by the fact that I had to ask for full owners for the period of four years especially for the purpose of reducing unemployment and putting a stop to the dissolution of the German agricultural population. I may further state that in 1933 the National Socialists did not interfere with any activities which were being carried out by others and which at the same time promised success. The Party was called to take over the government of the country at a moment when the possibilities of redeeming the situation in any other way had been exhausted and particularly when repeated attempts to overcome the economic crisis had failed. After four years from that date I now face the German people and you, gentlemen and members of the Reichstag, to give an account of what has been accomplished. On this occasion I do not think you will withhold your sanction from what the National Socialist Government has done and you will agree that I have fulfilled the promises I made four years ago. It was not an easy undertaking. I am not giving away any secrets when I tell you that at that time the so-called economic experts were convinced that the economic crisis could not be overcome.
Wir wollen auch niemanden zu Unrecht anklagen oder Tadel und Vorwurf nach allen Seiten verteilen. Wir tun lediglich das, was notwendig ist. Das aber tun wir schnell und grьndlich. Wir wollen lieber ein paar Jahre geflickte Kleider tragen, als einen Zustand heraufbeschwцren, in dem unser Volk ein paar Jahrhunderte in Lumpen herumlaufen mьsste. Was sollen heute noch Modesalons, die Licht, Heizung und menschliche Arbeitskraft verbrauchen. Sie werden nach dem Kriege, wenn wir wieder Zeit und Lust dazu haben, neu erstehen. Was sollen Frisiersalons, in denen ein Schцnheitskult gepflegt wird, der ungeheuer viel Zeit und Arbeitskraft beansprucht, der fьr den Frieden zwar sehr schцn und angenehm, fьr den Krieg aber ьberflьssig ist. Unsere Frauen und Mдdchen werden einmal unseren siegreich heimkehrenden Soldaten auch ohne friedensmдЯige Aufmachung gefallen. In den цffentlichen Amtern wird in Zukunft etwas schneller und unbьrokratischer gearbeitet werden. Es ergibt durchaus kein gutes Bild, wenn dort nach achtstьndiger Arbeitszeit auf die Minute genau Schluss gemacht wird. Nicht das Volk ist fьr die Amter, sondern die Amter sind fьr das Volk da. Man arbeite also so lange, bis die Arbeit erledigt ist. Das ist das Gebot des Krieges. Wenn der Fьhrer das kann, so werden auch die Diener des Staates das kцnnen. Ist fьr eine lдngere Arbeitszelt nicht genьgend Arbeit da, so gibt man 10 oder 20 oder 30 Prozent der Mitarbeiter an die kriegswichtige Wirtschaft ab und stellt damit wieder eine entsprechende Anzahl Mдnner fьr die Front frei. Das gilt fьr alle Dienststellen in der Heimat. Vielleicht wird gerade dadurch auch die Arbeit in den Amtern etwas schneller und etwas weniger schwerfдllig vor sich gehen. Wir mьssen im Kriege lernen, nicht nur grьndlich, sondern auch prompt zu arbeiten. Der Soldat an der Front hat auch nicht wochenlang Zeit, sich eine MaЯnahme zu ьberlegen, sie von Hand zu Hand weiterzugeben oder in den Akten verstauben zu lassen. Er muss sofort handeln, weil er sonst sein Leben verliert. Wir in der Heimat verlieren zwar durch schwerfдlliges Arbeiten nicht unser eigenes Leben, aber wir gefдhrden damit auf die Dauer das Leben unseres Volkes. Ьberhaupt muss jeder es sich zu einem selbstverstдndlichen Gebot der Kriegsmoral machen, auf die berechtigten Forderungen des arbeitenden und kдmpfenden Volkes die grцЯte Rьcksicht zu nehmen. Wir sind keine Spielverderber, aber wir lassen uns auch nicht das Spiel verderben. Wenn beispielsweise gewisse Mдnner und Frauen sich wochenlang in den Kurorten herumrдkeln, sich dort Gerьchte zutratschen und schwer Kriegsversehrten und Arbeitern and Arbeiterinnen, die nach einjдhrigem, hartem Einsatz Anspruch auf Urlaub haben, den Platz wegnehmen, so ist das unertrдglich und deshalb abgestellt worden. Der Krieg ist nicht die richtige Zeit fьr einen gewissen Amьsierpцbel. Unsere Freude ist bis zu seinem Ende die Arbeit und der Kampf, darin finden wir unsere tiefe innere Genugtuung. Wer das nicht aus eigenem Pflichtgefьhl versteht, der muss zu diesem Pflichtgefьhl erzogen, wenn nцtig auch gezwungen werden. Hier hilft nur hartes Durchgreifen. Es macht z. Die Eisenbahn dient heute kriegswichtigen Transporten und kriegsnotwendigen Geschдftsreisen. Urlaub hat nur der zu beanspruchen, der sonst in seiner Arbeits- oder Kampfkraft schwer gefдhrdet wьrde. Wenn also der erste Mann im Staate seine Pflicht so ernst und so verantwortungsvoll auffasst, dann muss das fьr jeden Bьrger und jede Bьrgerin des Staates eine stumme, aber doch unьberhцrbare Aufforderung sein, sich auch danach zu richten. Die Regierung tut andererseits alles, um dem arbeitenden Volke in dieser schweren Zeit die nцtigen Entspannungsmцglichkeiten zu erhalten. Theater, Kinos, Musiksдle bleiben voll im Betrieb. Der Rundfunk wird bestrebt sein, sein Programm noch zu erweitern und zu vervollkommnen. Wir haben durchaus nicht die Absicht, ьber unser Volk eine graue Winterstimmung heraufzubeschwцren. Was dem Volke dient, was seine Kampf- und Arbeitskraft erhдlt, stдhlt und vermehrt, das ist gut und kriegswichtig. Das Gegenteil ist abzuschaffen. Ich habe deshalb als Ausgleich gegen die eben geschilderten MaЯnahmen angeordnet, dass die geistigen und seelischen Erholungsstдtten des Volkes nicht vermindert, sondern vermehrt werden. Soweit sie unseren Kriegsanstrengungen nicht schaden, sondern sie fцrdern, mьssen sie auch von Seiten der Staats- und Volksfьhrung eine entsprechende Fцrderung erfahren. Das gilt auch fьr den Sport. Der Sport ist heute keine Angelegenheit bevorzugter Kreise, sondern eine Angelegenheit des ganzen Volkes. K-Stellungen sind auf dem Sportgebiet gдnzlich sinnlos. Der Sport hat ja die Aufgabe, die Kцrperkraft zu stдhlen, doch wohl in der Hauptsache zu dem Zweck, sie wenigstens in der schlimmsten Notzeit des Volkes zum Einsatz zu bringen. Das alles will auch die Front. Das fordert mit stьrmischer Zustimmung das ganze deutsche Volk. Es will jetzt nichts mehr hцren von kriegsunwichtiger Betriebsamkeit und дhnlichen Wichtigtuereien, die nur Zeit und Aufwand erfordern. Es will nichts mehr hцren von einem ьberspannten umstдndlichen Fragebogenunwesen fьr jeden Unsinn. Es will sich nicht in tausend Kleinigkeiten verzetteln, die fьr den Frieden vielleicht wichtig waren, fьr den Krieg aber keine Bedeutung besitzen. Es braucht auch nicht unter dauernder Erinnerung an das schwere Opfer unserer Soldaten in Stalingrad an seine Pflicht gemahnt zu werden. Es weiЯ, was es zu tun und was es zu lassen hat. So wie der Fьhrer dem ganzen Volke ein Beispiel gibt, so muss das ganze Volk in allen seinen Schichten sich dieses Beispiel auch zum Vorbild nehmen. Wenn er nur Arbeit und Sorgen kennt, so wollen wir ihm Arbeit und Sorgen nicht allein ьberlassen, sondern den Teil, den wir ihm abnehmen kцnnen, auch auf uns nehmen. Die Zeit, die wir heute durchleben, hat in ihrer ganzen Anlage fьr jeden echten Nationalsozialisten eine verblьffende Дhnlichkeit mit der Kampzeit. Da und immer haben wir so gehandelt. Wir sind immer mit dem Volke durch dick und dьnn gegangen, und darum ist das Volk uns auch auf allen Wegen gefolgt. Wir haben immer mit dem Volke gemeinsam alle Lasten getragen, und deshalb schienen uns die Lasten nicht schwer, sondern leicht zu sein. Das Volk will gefьhrt werden. Noch niemals gab es in der Geschichte ein Beispiel dafьr, dass in einer kritischen Stunde des nationalen Lebens das Volk einer tapferen und entschlossenen Fьhrung die Gefolgschaft versagt hдtte. Ich mцchte in diesem Zusammenhang auch ьber einige praktische MaЯnahmen des totalen Krieges, die wir bereits getroffen haben, ein paar Worte verlieren. Diesen beiden Zielen mьssen alle anderen Bedьrfnisse untergeordnet werden, selbst auf Kosten unseres sozialen Lebensniveaus wдhrend des Krieges. Das soll nicht eine endgьltige Stabilisierung unseres Lebensstandards darstellen, sondern gilt nur als Mittel zur Erreichung des Zweckes, nдmlich des eines totalen Sieges. Es mьssen im Rahmen dieser Aktion hunderttausende von U. K-Stellungen in der Heimat aufgehoben werden. Diese U. K-Stellungen waren bisher notwendig, weil wir nicht ausreichend Fach- und Schlьsselkrдfte zur Verfьgung hatten, die die durch Aufhebung der U. K-Stellungen leer werdenden Plдtze besetzen konnten. Es ist der Sinn der getroffenen und noch zu treffenden MaЯnahmen, die dafьr benцtigten Arbeitskrдfte zu mobilisieren. Darum geht unser Appell an die noch auЯerhalb der Kriegswirtschaft stehenden Mдnner und die bisher noch auЯerhalb des Arbeitsprozesses stehenden Frauen. Sie werden sich diesem Appell nicht versagen wollen und auch nicht versagen kцnnen. Die Arbeitspflicht fьr Frauen ist sehr weitschichtig gefasst worden Das heiЯt aber nicht, dass nur diejenigen, die im Gesetz genannt worden sind, arbeiten dьrfen. Jeder ist uns willkommen, und je mehr sich fьr den groЯen Umschichtungsprozess in der inneren Wirtschaft zur Verfьgung stellen, umso mehr Soldaten kцnnen wir fьr die Front freimachen. Unsere Feinde behaupten, die deutschen Frauen seien nicht in der Lage, den Mann in der Kriegswirtschaft zu ersetzen. Das mag fьr bestimmte schwere kцrperliche Arbeiten unserer Kriegsfertigung zutreffen. Darьber hinaus aber bin ich der Ьberzeugung, dass die deutsche Frau fest entschlossen ist, den Platz, den der Mann, der an die Front geht, freimacht, in kьrzester Frist voll auszufьllen. Wir brauchen uns da gar nicht auf bolschewistische Beispiele zu berufen. Auch in der deutschen Kriegswirtschaft sind seit Jahren schon Millionen bester deutscher Frauen mit grцЯtem Erfolg tдtig, und sie warten mit Ungeduld darauf, dass ihre Reihen baldigst durch neuen Zuzug vermehrt und ergдnzt werden. Alle die, die sich fьr diese Arbeit zur Verfьgung stellen, erfьllen damit nur eine Dankespflicht der Front gegenьber. Hunderttausende sind schon gekommen, hunderttausende werden noch kommen. In kьrzester Zeit hoffen wir damit Armeen von Arbeitskrдften freizumachen, die ihrerseits wieder Armeen von kдmpfenden Frontsoldaten freistellen werden. Ich mьsste mich sehr in den deutschen Frauen tдuschen, wenn ich annehmen sollte, dass sie den hiermit an sie ergehenden Appell ьberhцren wollten. Sie werden sich nicht in engherzigster Weise an das Gesetz anklammern oder gar noch versuchen, durch seine Maschen zu entschlьpfen. Im Ьbrigen wьrden die wenigen, die solche Absichten verfolgen, damit bei uns nicht landen. Arztliche Atteste werden statt der aufgerufenen Arbeitskraft nicht als vollwertig angenommen. Auch eine etwaige Alibi-Arbeit, die man sich beim Mann oder beim Sciiwager oder bei einem guten Bekannten verschafft, um sich unbeaufsichtigt weiter an der Arbeit vorbeidrьcken zu kцnnen, wird von uns mit entsprechenden GegenmaЯnahmen beantwortet werden. Die wenigen, die solche Plдne verfolgen, kцnnen sich damit in der цffentlichen Wertung nur selbst erledigen. Das Volk wird ihnen die grцЯte Verachtung zollen. Niemand verlangt, dass eine Frau, die dazu nicht die nцtigen kцrperlichen Voraussetzungen mitbringt, in die schwere Fertigung einer Panzerfabrik geht. Es gibt aber eine Unmenge von Fertigungen auch in der Kriegsindustrie, die ohne allzu starke kцrperliche Anstrengung geleistet werden kцnnen und fьr die sich eine Frau, auch wenn sie aus bevorzugten Kreisen stammt, ruhig zur Verfьgung stellen kann. Niemand ist dafьr zu gut, und wir haben ja nur die Wahl, hier etwas Ganzes zu tun oder das Ganze zu verlieren. Es wдre auch angebracht, dass Frauen, die Dienstpersonal beschдftigen, jetzt schon diese Frage einer Ьberprьfung unterzцgen. Allerdings ist dann das Leben nicht mehr so gemьtlich wie im Frieden. Aber wir leben ja auch nicht im Frieden, sondern im Kriege. Gemьtlich werden wir es uns wieder machen, wenn wir den Sieg in Hдnden halten. Jetzt aber mьssen wir fьr den Sieg unter weitestgehender Aufopferung unserer Bequemlichkeit kдmpfen. Auch und gerade die Kriegerfrauen werden das verstehen. Sie werden es fьr ihre hцchste Verpflichtung halten, ihren Mдnnern drauЯen an der Front dadurch zur Seite zu treten, dass sie sich einer kriegswichtigen Arbeit zur Verfьgung stellen. Das betrifft vor allem die Landwirtschaft. Die Frauen der Landarbeiter haben hier ein gutes Beispiel zu geben. Es gilt fьr alle Mдnner und Frauen der Grundsatz, dass es fьr niemanden angebracht ist, im Kriege sogar noch weniger zu tun als im Frieden; die Arbeit muss auf allen Gebieten vermehrt werden. Man darf ьbrigens nicht den Fehler machen, alles, was jetzt nцtig ist, auf die Regierung zu schieben. Die Regierung kann nur die groЯen Rahmengesetze schaffen. Den Rahmengesetzen Leben und Inhalt zu geben, ist Aufgabe des arbeitenden Volkes; und zwar soll das unter der befeuernden Fьhrung der Partei geschehen. Schnelles Handeln ist hier erstes Gebot. Ьber die gesetzliche Verpflichtung hinaus also gilt jetzt die Parole: Freiwillige vor! Hier appelliere ich vor allem als Berliner Gauleiter an meine Berliner Mitbьrgerinnen. Sie haben im Verlaufe dieses Krieges schon so viele edle Beispiele einer tapferen Lebensgesinnung gegeben, dass sie sich gewiss auch dieser Forderung gegenьber nicht beschдmen lassen wollen. Sie haben sich durch ihre praktische Lebensart, sowie durch die Frische ihrer Lebensauffassung auch im Kriege in der ganzen Welt einen guten Namen erworben. Diesen guten Namen gilt es jetzt durch eine groЯzьgige Handlungsweise zu erhalten und zu verstдrken. Wenn ich also meine Berliner Mitbьrgerinnen aufrufe, sich schnell, prompt und ohne viel Einwendungen einer kriegswichtigen Arbeit zur Verfьgung zu stellen, so weiЯ ich, dass alle diesem Appell Folge leisten werden. Wir wollen jetzt nicht ьber die Schwere der Zeit klagen oder uns einander etwas vorrдsonnieren, wir wollen, wie das nicht nur Berliner, sondern deutsche Art ist, zupacken, handeln, die Initiative ergreifen, selbst etwas tun und nicht alles den anderen zu tun ьberlassen. Welche deutsche Frau wollte es ьbers Herz bringen, sich einem solchen Appell, den ich vor allem fьr die kдmpfende Front an die deutsche Frauenwelt richte, zu entziehen? Wer wollte jetzt eine spieЯige Bequemlichkeit ьber das nationale Pflichtgebot stellen? Wer wollte jetzt noch angesichts der schweren Bedrohung, der wir alle ausgesetzt sind, an seine egoistischen privaten Bedьrfnisse denken und nicht an die ьber alledem stehenden Notwendigkeiten des Krieges? Ich weise mit Verachtung den Vorwurf, den uns unsere Feinde machen, zurьck, dass das eine Nachahmung des Bolschewismus sei. Wir wollen den Bolschewismus nicht nachahmen, wir wollen ihn besiegen, und zwar mit Mitteln und Methoden, die ihm gewachsen sind. Die deutsche Frau wird das am ehesten verstehen, denn sie hat lдngst erkannt, dass der Krieg, den heute unsere Mдnner fьhren, ein Krieg vor allem zum Schutze ihrer Kinder ist. Ihr heiligstes Gut wird also in diesem Kriege durch den Einsatz des kostbarsten Blutes unseres Volkes beschirmt. Mit diesem Kampf der Mдnner muss die deutsche Frau auch nach auЯen hin spontan ihre Solidaritдt bekunden. Sie muss sich lieber morgen als ьbermorgen in die Reihen der Millionen schaffender Angestellten und Arbeiterinnen einreihen und das Heer der arbeitenden Heimat auch durch ihre eigene Person vermehren. Es muss wie ein Strom der Bereitschaft durch das deutsche Volk gehen. Ich erwarte, dass sich nun ungezдhlte Frauen und vor allem auch Mдnner, die bisher noch keine kriegswichtige Arbeit taten, bei den Meldestellen melden. Wer sicii sciinell gibt, der gibt sicii doppelt. Daneben vollziehen sich groЯzьgige Zusammenlegungen in unserer allgemeinen Wirtschaft. Das betrifft vor allem unser Versicherungs- und Bankenwesen, das Steuerwesen, unser nicht kriegs- und lebensnotwendiges Zeitschriften und Zeitungswesen, das betrifft fьr den Krieg entbehrliche Partei- und Verwaltungsbetriebe, aber auch eine weitere Vereinfachung der Lebensfьhrung unseres Volkes. Ich habe Verstдndnis fьr diese Opfer, und die Volksfьhrung ist bemьht, diese auf ein MindestmaЯ zu beschrдnken. Aber ein gewisser Rest wird ьbrig bleiben, der getragen werden muss. Nach dem Kriege werden wir das, was wir heute auflцsen, grцЯer und schцner denn je wieder neu aufbauen, und der Staat wird dazu seine helfende Hand leihen. Ich wende mich in diesem Zusammenhang eindringlich gegen die Behauptung, dass mit unseren MaЯnahmen eine Stilllegung des Mittelstandes oder eine Monopolisierung unserer Wirtschaft bezweckt wьrde. Nach dem Kriege wird der Mittelstand sofort wieder in grцЯtem Umfange wirtschaftlich and sozial wiederhergestellt. Sie streben nicht eine strukturelle Verдnderung der Wirtschaft an, sondern sind lediglich auf das Ziel ausgerichtet, den Sieg so schnell und so grьndlich wie mцglich erkдmpfen zu helfen.
"Why We Are Antisemites" - Text of Adolf Hitler's 1920 speech at the Hofbräuhaus
This list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items. (February 2011). Причем слова, фразы и цитаты использовались немецкой пропагандой не лишь для укрепления воинского духа солдат или «рекламы» известной идеологии. Опозорили Германию перед всем миром. Звук с фразой "Гитлер капут" на немецком языке (мужской голос). Wir wollen nicht lügen und wollen nicht schwindeln. Ich habe deshalb es abgelehnt, jemals vor dieses Volk hinzutreten und billige Versprechungen zu geben. In uns selbst allein liegt die Zukunft des deutschen Volkes. Wenn wir selbst dieses deutsche Volk emporführen zu eigener Arbeit, zu eigenem.
Адольф Гитлер Фразы На Немецком Скачать mp3
Adolf Hitler beeinflusste die Geschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts auf schreckliche Weise. Doch wie wurde er zum Diktator, der die Welt mit einem verheerenden Krieg und dem Holocaust in eine Katastrophe stürzte? Выражение “Гитлер капут” имеет хорошие шансы навсегда выветриться из коллективной памяти немцев. причем в оригинале, русский перевод с купюрами я уже. Главная» Новости» Выступление гитлера на немецком текст.