Новости найденный по тегу Питер Лавелль.
«С политической точки зрения Америка сейчас слаба как никогда».
американский журналист и ведущий политического ток-шоу CrossTalk на англоязычном телеканале RT, который контролируется. Смотрите видео на тему «peter lavelle russia today» в TikTok (тикток). Смотрите видео онлайн «Russia Today CrossTalk with Peter Lavelle» на канале «Игры и Детство» в хорошем качестве и бесплатно, опубликованное 22 октября 2023 года в 17:41, длительностью. американский журналист и ведущий политического ток-шоу CrossTalk на англоязычном телеканале RT, который контролируется.
Питер Гэбриел посвятил песню убитому британскому политику
Российское гражданство также получил американский журналист, ведущий политического ток-шоу на телеканале RT Питер Лавелль. Канадец защищает цвета питерского клуба с лета 2023 года, ранее он выступал за магнитогорский "Металлург". Самые интересные и важные новости ищите в нашем Telegram-канале и Viber.
Компания приобрела также кофейни Gudmen в Екатеринбурге. В общей сложности количество точек управления Coffee Like вырастет до 1133. Помимо этого, компания ведет переговоры о покупке бизнеса других региональных сетей.
Компания Coffee Like принадлежит предпринимателю Аязу Шабутдинову, который стал известен также как блогер и инфобизнесмен.
По его словам, открыть Leps Bar планируется летом 2024 года. Заведение будет включать караоке, коктейль-бар и ночной клуб. Как уточнила руководитель отдела торговой недвижимости NF Group в Санкт-Петербурге Анна Лапченко, локация граничит с одним из основных торговых коридоров северной столицы — Большой Конюшенной улицей, где по результатам 2023 года ставки аренды в стрит-ритейле составляли 3,8 — 7,7 тысячи рублей за квадратный метр в месяц.
This will surprise you: not getting paid for my work. I have lost count of the number of articles I wrote without being compensated when I was still in print journalism. Today I can write for media outlets without asking for compensation — a wonderful position to be in. Anyone acquainted with my long lost friend — my Untimely Thoughts newsletter — knows I have changed very little over the years. Television has not changed me; it has only allowed me to amplify my worldview.
Who are the best Russia commentators? Who are the worst? Who are the best? I think it is pointless to answer this question. Among the commentariat there is a small cottage industry that regularly condemns me — everyone reading this interview knows who I am referring to. To this day not one aspersion said or written about me warrants my reply. These are small minded people and most of them are journalists because they lack the ability and talent to do anything else. These are the worst kind of people — they get along by going along. What is your favourite place in Russia?
I love and hate Moscow! Moscow is my home so I make the best of it. Because of my CrossTalk program, I very rarely travel anymore. In fact, I have seen very little of this vast country. I have visited various cities between Moscow and St Petersburg and down south as far as Chechnya. By my own admission, I should be better travelled after so many years. I am still hoping to make it to Vladivostok. If you could recommend one book about Russia, what would it be? Are Russian journalists freer or safer than they were before?
The ending of Soviet era censorship was a great moment for Russians and Russian society. Some embraced honest and professional journalism; others practiced this trade with regrettable irresponsibility. In the 90s the oligarchs divided up among themselves huge media empires — none ofwhich had any interest in real journalism or the social good. These media empires were political tools that terribly damaged journalism as a trade, profession, the political environment and even the world of business. Since about 2000 circa Putin , media in Russia is very much a business and a very profitable one at that! Today media caters more to audience interests and tastes — mostly entertainment particularly when it comes to television. Is this good? Does this make a better society? Are people well enough informed?
Russians — like their global counterparts — are well enough informed about their environment to make rational decisions about their lives. As for the safety of journalists in Russia: this is a very painful and even shameful state of affairs. The police and judiciary need to do much more for journalists. Their inability to prosecute those behind high profile murders hurts journalism as a profession and public trust in state authorities. On balance, do you think Putinism was good or bad for Russia? Try not to sit on the fence here. Vladimir Putin is the best thing to happen to Russia in its modern history — he is a rational person and a true patriot. Because of Putin, Russians are freer and richer now than any time since the Russian state came into existence centuries ago. Putin saved the Russian state from thieving oligarchs and their highly paid western advisors.
And he rightfully fought terrorism in the Caucasus when the West hoped for the slow and painful collapse of the Russian state in the wake of the Soviet collapse. Putin is the antithesis of Western hypocrisy and history will be very kind to him. Russians give him a lot of credit and he deserves it. Which was the main party responsible for their deterioration in the first place? Washington caved to reality — the American empire is collapsing. Out of self-interest Russia is willing to engage Obama. Pragmatic Russia today is helping Soviet Amerika out of a mess of its own making. Moscow does not give a hoot about Obama or the US. What Moscow does care about is how the world will evolve as the US deals with its own and much needed, but rarely spoken about, perestroika.
The US is in decline and Russia along with the emerging world is readying itself for the inevitable paradigm shift.
Репортер CNN не выдержал словесной дуэли с журналистом RT
Соучредитель PayPal и Palantir Питер Тиль в интервью Financial Times рассказал, что держал $50 млн на счету в банке Silicon Valley Bank. Гости Питера Лавелля обсуждают её деятельность на этом посту и сопоставляют. американский журналист и ведущий CrossTalk, политического ток-шоу на англоязычном телеканале Russia Today. американский журналист и ведущий CrossTalk на англоязычном телеканале RT.
Лавель, Питер
Palestinians are less than second class citizens in Palestine, Chechens have the same rights as any other Russian citizen. Israel is a zionist state; Russia is a secular state protecting the religious rights of all citizens. Hamas was democratically elected; the Caucasus Emirate was not elected by anyone. I could easily go on. Nonetheless, we need some perspective.
The US economy is still much larger than that of its nearest competitor, China which has lots of bad loans and will be devastated if it were to pull the plug on its prime export market. The Eurozone may already be on the verge of unraveling. So is it then reasonable to speculate about the collapse of Pax Americana, considering its current strength and the problems afflicting potential rivals? If it does collapse, which country or bloc will take its place, if any?
Everything you point out in your question is correct about the US. No one wants to sacrifice — and so many want too much without paying for it. This cannot last much longer — a couple of decades at best. America simply cannot maintain a global empire and prosperity at home.
Hopefully the world will truly become multi-polar. Such a world is better for all of humanity. Today the world has to wait on all these issues because the US is very often the greatest barrier to positive change in world. That may be so.
Nonetheless, many observers believe you and RT are hardly free of the same biases that you claim pervade the Western MSM. First, do you think this is a valid argument? He is entitled to his opinion, though they are not opinions I agree with. So I will answer my critics on the compensation issue.
Yes, I live a comfortable life in Moscow as far as a journalist is concerned, but that is not saying much these days! I am compensated because my work is hard, presenting truly alternative viewpoints, and promoting the station — no different from other television professionals around the world. I am American and proud of it. Being American allows me to dissent — and I dissent all the time!
RT allows me to do this when most western media outlets could never dream of giving a journalist so much free space. The same applies to others in the commentariat because their lack of talent or success. How often these days do I openly attack my critics? I am attacked and vilified because of my employer, but not my message.
That is cheap. I do not speak for RT — I can only speak for myself and my work at the television station. Again being honest — some RT reports are a bit over the top. But this is a good thing in the end — we ask our audience one basic thing: Question More.
We may not always get it right, but our intention is spot on. As far as Kremlin spin-doctoring is concerned, all I can say that this assumption is laughable. Yes, of course it does and many other viewpoints as well. Why should anyone be surprised by this?
Also, anyone who has watched RT will tell you that the station is not only about politics. RT wants to be and is competitive. This is because it is consciously different from its competitors. It is part of my job to watch the competition.
I welcome this opportunity. You asked for 3 examples, well I will give you 10. Support of the older generation pensions. Repair of and construction of new infrastructure.
Support of small and medium size businesses. Development of political parties. Over reliance on the oil and natural gas sectors. Introduction of a volunteer-only military and military reform in general.
Finding justice in so-called high-profile murders. The lack of competition in the marketplace.
Russia refuses to do this. This infuriates many in the West. The fact is Russia and Russians liberated themselves from communism! According to the Western discourse regarding history, Russia is not repenting for the past, thus it still must be the enemy. The good news is Russia is a political fact on the ground and the West has no choice but to do business with it. You are asking me to compare apples with cement bricks! The Israelis threw the Palestinians off their land and deny them their own state. Chechens have their republic within the Russian Federation, which is generously supported by the federal government.
Palestinians are less than second class citizens in Palestine, Chechens have the same rights as any other Russian citizen. Israel is a zionist state; Russia is a secular state protecting the religious rights of all citizens. Hamas was democratically elected; the Caucasus Emirate was not elected by anyone. I could easily go on. Nonetheless, we need some perspective. The US economy is still much larger than that of its nearest competitor, China which has lots of bad loans and will be devastated if it were to pull the plug on its prime export market. The Eurozone may already be on the verge of unraveling. So is it then reasonable to speculate about the collapse of Pax Americana, considering its current strength and the problems afflicting potential rivals? If it does collapse, which country or bloc will take its place, if any? Everything you point out in your question is correct about the US.
No one wants to sacrifice — and so many want too much without paying for it. This cannot last much longer — a couple of decades at best. America simply cannot maintain a global empire and prosperity at home. Hopefully the world will truly become multi-polar. Such a world is better for all of humanity. Today the world has to wait on all these issues because the US is very often the greatest barrier to positive change in world. That may be so. Nonetheless, many observers believe you and RT are hardly free of the same biases that you claim pervade the Western MSM. First, do you think this is a valid argument? He is entitled to his opinion, though they are not opinions I agree with.
So I will answer my critics on the compensation issue. Yes, I live a comfortable life in Moscow as far as a journalist is concerned, but that is not saying much these days! I am compensated because my work is hard, presenting truly alternative viewpoints, and promoting the station — no different from other television professionals around the world. I am American and proud of it. Being American allows me to dissent — and I dissent all the time! RT allows me to do this when most western media outlets could never dream of giving a journalist so much free space. The same applies to others in the commentariat because their lack of talent or success. How often these days do I openly attack my critics? I am attacked and vilified because of my employer, but not my message. That is cheap.
I do not speak for RT — I can only speak for myself and my work at the television station. Again being honest — some RT reports are a bit over the top. But this is a good thing in the end — we ask our audience one basic thing: Question More. We may not always get it right, but our intention is spot on. As far as Kremlin spin-doctoring is concerned, all I can say that this assumption is laughable. Yes, of course it does and many other viewpoints as well. Why should anyone be surprised by this? Also, anyone who has watched RT will tell you that the station is not only about politics. RT wants to be and is competitive. This is because it is consciously different from its competitors.
It is part of my job to watch the competition. I welcome this opportunity. You asked for 3 examples, well I will give you 10.
Однако, даже в самых темных временах, он обнаружил свой талант и страсть к искусству. Его родители, хоть и не могли себе позволить обеспечить ему образование в престижных учебных заведениях, всегда поддерживали его стремление к саморазвитию. С первых лет жизни Лавель проявлял интерес к музыке и искусству. Он изучал музыкальные инструменты насколько это было возможно, часто используя собственные методы и экспериментируя с звуками. Его творческий гений проявился в раннем возрасте, и вскоре его талант привлек внимание окружающих. Несмотря на трудности, с которыми приходилось сталкиваться, Лавель не унывал. Он продолжал двигаться вперед, настойчиво преследуя свою мечту стать признанным музыкальным артистом.
Его зовут Питер Лавелль, он работает на канале Russia Today — это часть принадлежащей российскому правительству новостной сети. Питер, вы меня слышите? Спасибо, что нашли для нас время. Я хочу спросить вас, почему Россия, в частности Владимир Путин... Почему Россия, почему Владимир Путин не выступил и не осудил то, как обращались с местом преступления? Украина — это не часть России.
У Владимира Путина нет контроля над местом преступления в другой стране. Я думаю, с вашей стороны было довольно нелепо задать такой вопрос. Он выступил с требованием полноценного расследования. На самом деле, в этот понедельник Россия предоставила свой собственный анализ данных разведки и наблюдения, спутниковых данных, касающихся того, что происходило на месте преступления. При этом Вашингтон ничего подобного не сделал. Таким образом, я думаю, вам стоит спросить, почему доводы Госдепартамента опираются на Twitter, YouТube и другие социальные сети, в то время как Россия уже предоставила, по крайней мере, частично, улики, необходимые для раскрытия этого ужасающего преступления.
На самом деле США уже опубликовали множество своих собственных разведданных, которые указывают на связь между крушением MH-17 и действиями российских боевиков, а может быть, и на причастность России к обучению, снабжению или даже, возможно, оказанию помощи в проведении этой чудовищной операции по уничтожению самолета. О каких уликах идет речь? Питер, я не думаю, что к этому можно относиться легкомысленно. Давайте не будем здесь играть в политику. Очень легкомысленно! Где доказательства?
Даже представители разведслужб заявляют, что не знают, кто это сделал. Не знают, откуда был удар. Соединенные Штаты ежегодно тратят сотню миллиардов долларов на глобальную разведку. И они не могут выяснить? Это просто неслыханно! Где их данные?
Пожалуйста, предъявите нам данные! И тогда мы сможем двигаться дальше...
«С политической точки зрения Америка сейчас слаба как никогда».
Также российское гражданство получили американский журналист и ведущий англоязычного телеканала RT Питер Лавелль, греческий фотограф Костас Асимис. политики, ученые, бизнесмены и общественные деятели - в споре отстаивают свою точку зрения на актуальные события международной жизни. Питер Лавелль обсудил с гостями программы, кому он выгоден и чем может завершиться.